1,052 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Thorough, consistently formatted competitor and product research. Produces a structured "About" doc, a "Recent News" log, and a row in a tracking spreadsheet. Use whenever the user researches a company or competitor, builds or updates a competitor doc, compares products, or logs a competitor to the tracker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research current job markets and hiring requirements, analyze recent job descriptions (JDs), compare them with a user's resume, projects, skills, and constraints, and turn evidence gaps into prioritized career actions. Use when students, job seekers, or career changers ask about current role or industry outlook (including “现在行情怎么样”), whether a role or JD fits them (including “这个JD适合我吗”), cross-platform JD sampling, resume evidence gaps or truthful tailoring, what career skill to learn next, target-role course or certificate decisions, application readiness, or a capacity-bounded 30/60/90-day job-search plan. Do not use for unrelated personal or education advice, simple factual lookups, automatic job applications, or unsupported resume rewriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search, score, and compare flights with jetlag impact analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare models with A/B testing for selection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI tool marketplace via AgentForge — discover, compare, and execute tools with automatic billing and trust scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use cheap, TEE-verified AI models from the 0G Compute Network as OpenClaw providers. Discover available models and compare pricing vs OpenRouter, verify provider integrity via hardware attestation (Intel TDX), manage your 0G wallet and sub-accounts, and configure models in OpenClaw with one workflow. Supports DeepSeek, GLM-5, Qwen, and other models available on the 0G marketplace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score an Instagram creator's (or a list of creators') audience authenticity and engagement quality using Xpoz. Measures real engagement rate against views rather than follower count, the bot/spam share of their comments, and an overall 0-100 authenticity score for influencer vetting and partner selection. Use when asked to "vet this influencer", "are their followers real", "check engagement quality for @username", "rate these Instagram accounts", "compare creators before a sponsorship", or when the user pastes a list of Instagram handles to evaluate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger when: (1) the user mentions "manim", "scene", "video", "EN/KO render", "GEODE_HERO_LANG", "1080p60", or (2) editing files under `scripts/visualizations/` ending in `.py`, or (3) the user asks to render, re-render, or extend any of the four validated scenes (`geode_hero.py`, `autoresearch_filewalk.py`, `autoresearch_compare.py`, `critical_floor.py`). GEODE Manim Scene authoring standard. Locks the patterns the four validated scenes already share — Anthropic-style palette, Helvetica Neue + Pretendard font pairing with weight=NORMAL, EN/KO multilingual lang via `GEODE_HERO_LANG` env, `_dashed_arrow_with_head` stage-coupled tinting, `verify_hero_layout.py` ratchet — so the next scene does not re-discover the kerning / padding / transition regressions catalogued in [[viz-frame-audit]].
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches and compares free and open source software projects in a supplied domain, using either user-named candidates or a discovered shortlist. Use when evaluating FOSS alternatives, comparing GitHub popularity, maintenance, licences, domain fit, trade-offs, or producing a linked HTML comparison report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
对 profiling 数据（kernel_details.csv / trace_view.json / step_trace_time.csv）做统一分析： 5 层递进管道（analyze_trace.py）+ baseline/优化后 kernel diff（compare_traces.py），输出 瓶颈诊断、算子执行序、可融合候选与 P0-P2 方向建议。输入统一来自 profiling-collect。 只要用户有 profiling 产出并问"为什么慢/瓶颈在哪/优化前后差多少/往哪个方向"，都用本技能；采集走 profiling-collect，方案选档走 dit-perf-opt，实现/并行/基准走 pattern-dev/dit-parallel-opt/benchmark-dev——本技能只做诊断与方向。 由 model-auto-optimization 的 S1（融合分析）/S3（并行）阶段调用，亦由 dev-workflow 的分析阶段指引加载。 融合机会候选只做**识别**；候选的**边界与收益判定**（能不能融成一个单元、融多大、值不值）交 `fusion-scope-analyze`（本技能的辅助技能）——本技能不判融合边界。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a conversion-focused landing page that compares offers, pricing cues, and trust signals for a family law practice. Use when handling offer...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. NOT for product discovery or refining an existing plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect scoped Autodesk data, compare versioned BOMs, and prepare ownership-aware drafts or approved custom-property changes. Not for implicit PLM release, membership changes or CAD geometry editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Task-sized forensic analysis of Vivado synthesis and routed timing evidence for processor RTL. Use when Codex must trace a named setup or hold path, audit whole-design timing populations, compare implementation runs, map primitive, LUT, CARRY, BRAM, DSP, MUXF, register, and routed-net stages back to Chisel or generated RTL, distinguish logic from routing pressure, identify missing DCP queries, or write an evidence-backed timing report. This skill is read-only by default and stops at ranked modification directions. Use optimize-chisel-fpga-timing for RTL edits and routed A/B implementation closure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a reference image or mockup into a working local frontend that matches it closely. Inspects the image, extracts the design system (layout, type, spacing, color, components), implements it, then screenshot-compares and iterates to close the gap. Use when the user says "image to code", "build this mockup", "code this screenshot", "make this design real", or provides a UI image to implement. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for screenshot verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a live website into a working local frontend you can edit. Fetches the page, extracts its design system and structure, and rebuilds it locally in your stack, then screenshot-compares to the original. Use when the user says "url to code", "clone this site locally", "make it look like linear.app", "rebuild this page", or provides a live URL to recreate. Part of the Product Design set. Uses web-fetch + browser automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks skill matches by fit, performance history, and contextual relevance. Applies multi-factor scoring including success rate, resource usage, and task alignment. Activate on 'rank skills', 'best skill for', 'skill ranking', 'compare skills', 'optimal skill'. NOT for semantic matching (use dag-semantic-matcher) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。