「evaluate」の検索結果

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate AI model performance with metrics, benchmarks, and comparison. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-model-evaluator related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate AI copilot performance. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-copilot-evaluation related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and implement agricultural technology solutions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with agricultural-technology related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate AI agent performance and reliability. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-agent-evaluation related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate third-party logistics providers. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 3pl-evaluation related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the terum-skills CLI from a Claude Code or Codex session: run any verb with --format md and show its board — inspect the Library or the team Marketplace, search, fetch with sync, validate or fix a local skill, install the latest version into Global or an added project, publish a local skill as an immutable version, manage the eval queue — and prepare the verbs that belong in a terminal (project setup, skill move/copy/rename/delete, prune, reconcile, machine uninstall, team administration). Use when the user wants to manage, evaluate, publish or install skills and no narrower terum-skills skill fits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Arbor executor workflow: clone the repo from the git bundle your brief hands you, implement and evaluate exactly ONE hypothesis with the file tools, then report structured results via worker_complete. Preloaded automatically on arbor-executor task workers. Never touch the held-out test split.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create AI agents and workflows using Microsoft Agent Framework SDK. Supports single-agent and multi-agent workflow patterns. USE FOR: create agent, build agent, scaffold agent, new agent, agent framework, workflow pattern, multi-agent, MCP tools, create workflow. DO NOT USE FOR: deploying agents (use agent/deploy), evaluating agents (use agent/evaluate), Azure AI Foundry agents without Agent Framework SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit cloud costs, optimize API token usage, and evaluate pricing models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and evaluate programmatic SEO strategies for creating SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and structured data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pricing, packaging, plan structure, or monetization tradeoffs need to be evaluated against positioning, conversion, and margin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate pricing changes using ARPU, conversion, churn risk, NRR, and payback. Use when deciding whether a pricing move should ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Resource-Based View (Barney, 1991) and VRIO framework to evaluate whether a firm's resources and capabilities confer sustained competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to assess internal resources for strategic value, determine if a competitive edge is sustainable, audit resource portfolios for VRIO criteria, or when they ask 'what makes our advantage sustainable', 'which resources matter most', or 'can competitors replicate this'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Agency Theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) to diagnose principal-agent problems — moral hazard, adverse selection — and design governance mechanisms to align interests. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze conflicts of interest between owners and managers, design incentive or monitoring structures, evaluate corporate governance effectiveness, or when they ask 'how do we ensure managers act in shareholders interest', 'why is this incentive plan failing', or 'what governance mechanisms reduce agency costs'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Transaction Cost Economics (Williamson, 1975, 1985) to analyze governance structure choices — market, hybrid, or hierarchy — based on transaction characteristics. Use this skill when the user needs to decide make-or-buy, evaluate outsourcing vs vertical integration, design governance mechanisms for inter-firm relationships, or when they ask 'should we build this in-house or outsource', 'why do firms vertically integrate', or 'how should we structure this partnership'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to brainstorm, evaluate whether an idea is worth building, run office hours, or think through a new product idea or design direction before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Upper Echelons Theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984) to analyze how top management team characteristics — demographics, experiences, values — shape strategic choices and organizational outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate TMT composition effects on strategy, predict strategic direction from leadership profiles, assess whether managerial discretion enables or constrains executive influence, or when they ask 'does leadership background matter for strategy', 'how does TMT composition affect decisions', or 'why did this management team make that choice'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。