「protect」の検索結果

Run and interpret Clawix UI geometry, screenshot, protected-surface, and debt-baseline checks without authorizing visual repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review whether a Clawix UI pattern, visual decision, copy change, or component extraction belongs in canon, debt, exception, or protected-surface scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route protection with beforeLoad, redirect()/throw redirect(), isRedirect helper, authenticated layout routes (_authenticated), non-redirect auth (inline login), RBAC with roles and permissions, auth provider integration (Auth0, Clerk, Supabase), router context for auth state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape web pages using Scrapling with anti-bot bypass (like Cloudflare Turnstile), stealth headless browsing, spiders framework, adaptive scraping, and JavaScript rendering. Use when asked to scrape, crawl, or extract data from websites; web_fetch fails; the site has anti-bot protections; write Python code to scrape/crawl; or write spiders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 (Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems). Use for CUI confidentiality requirements on contractors and other nonfederal organizations, the 17 requirement families, ODPs, SSPs, POA&Ms, and tailoring from SP 800-53. Covers 800-171r3 only; does not replace SP 800-171A assessment procedures, full SP 800-53 baselines, CMMC scoring mechanics, or classified-information controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT data incident impact brief from the incident notes and data inventory the user provides: the timeline as stated, systems involved matched to the inventory, data categories held and evidenced as involved, people and record counts potentially affected with the source and method behind every figure, third parties, notification questions for legal and the data protection officer, and every UNKNOWN with the evidence that would settle it. No legal determination: it never states whether the incident is a reportable breach, whether notice is due, to whom or by when. Use when the user asks to "prepare the impact brief for this incident", "what data was involved", "how many people are affected", "map the incident to our data inventory" or "pull together what legal needs on the incident". Do not use for the blameless postmortem or root-cause timeline, use incident-postmortem-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts answers to the questions in a received RFP, RFQ or tender from the organisation's past responses, answer library, case studies, policies and other documents provided: one row per buyer question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted or Missing, its source and date, and a legal or pricing review flag on every answer touching terms, liability, warranties, insurance, data protection or price. Use when the user asks to "draft our RFP response", "answer this tender from our past proposals", "pre-fill the bid questions", "first pass at the RFQ answers" or "reuse our previous bid content". Do not use for writing the buyer's own RFP or requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for security or due diligence questionnaires use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill; for scoring received supplier responses use rfp-comparison-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite machine-written text so it reads like a busy human wrote it: cut 50-70%, break the even rhythm, drop AI-tell words and filler, keep facts and protected terms. Use before publishing any post, reply or email drafted by a model. Triggers: /ai-slop, /slop, humanize, anti-slop, make it shorter and alive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-mainline governance for deployless repositories. Use after a deployless audit when a repo needs trunk-based branch rules, branch protection, contribution guidance, review gates, merge queue policy, AI PR intake rules, or agent-ready mainline practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WooCommerce Memberships access, restriction, drip-content, product-grant, and member-discount playbook. Use when code checks whether a user can view/purchase content or products, changes scheduled access dates, customizes protected/public content, maps parent or variation products that grant membership access, applies member prices, reads original prices around discounts, or contains wc_memberships_user_can, wc_memberships_access_from_time, wc_memberships_user_has_member_discount, wc_memberships_get_member_product_discount, wc_memberships_get_discounted_price, or member discount badge hooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlutterSecureStorage (v10.x) for encrypted key-value storage of sensitive data using platform-native secure enclaves with biometric authentication support. Use this skill when storing OAuth tokens (access tokens, refresh tokens, ID tokens), API keys and secrets, user passwords or PINs, session tokens, encryption keys, private keys for cryptography, certificate data, biometric enrollment data, banking credentials, health data, or any sensitive information requiring platform-level encryption (iOS Keychain with Secure Enclave, Android Keystore with Hardware-backed keys). Supports Touch ID, Face ID, and Android biometric prompt integration. Handles biometric change invalidation (resetOnError), data migration from SharedPreferences/EncryptedSharedPreferences, Google Drive backup exclusion, automatic key rotation, configurable encryption algorithms (AES), and prevents data extraction even on rooted/jailbroken devices. Essential for authentication flows, secure credential management, or compliance requirements (PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR data protection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose active BIRD daemon incidents across config, runtime, environment, sockets, logs, source, and tooling. Use when BIRD fails to start or reload, crashes, loses sessions/routes, behaves differently after lint passes, or when birdcc and bird -p disagree. Collect read-only evidence first, protect routing secrets, and route isolated config edits to bird-agent or pure implementation research to bird-source-explorer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reproduce, isolate, and diagnose a specific software failure before changing production behaviour, then propose the smallest safe fix with regression protection. Use whenever the user reports a bug, crash, error, stack trace, flaky test, incorrect output, "works on my machine," intermittent failure, regression after a deploy, or any behaviour that diverges from expectation and the cause is not obvious. Prefer this over jumping straight to a fix. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution, while its own job is proving causality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a test strategy around product risk, business invariants, failure modes, and existing controls, deciding what deserves testing and at which boundary rather than maximising coverage. Use whenever the user asks how to test something, wants a test plan or strategy, is deciding between unit/integration/contract/E2E/property/concurrency testing, or wants to know whether existing tests actually protect what matters. Prefer this over writing tests immediately. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving risk coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Gcp Cloud Armor — google Cloud Armor security policy management, WAF rule configuration, adaptive protection analysis, and edge security policy management via gcloud CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure GitHub secret scanning and push protection, triage secret alerts, and run local pre-commit secret audits. Use when enabling secret scanning, handling blocked pushes, defining custom patterns, or checking a repo for accidental credentials before commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Netlify deploys — Git continuous deployment, CLI manual/anonymous deploys, Deploy to Netlify buttons, drag-and-drop, and per-context netlify.toml build settings. Use when linking a repo, deploying from the CLI, setting up Deploy Previews or branch deploys, configuring deploy contexts, adding skew protection, fixing a failed or secrets-flagged deploy, or wiring build hooks and Deploy to Netlify buttons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add authentication and user management to a Netlify site with @netlify/identity — signup/login/logout, OAuth social login (Google/GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket), server-side user verification in Functions, role-based access control (RBAC), admin user management, and Identity event hooks. Use when adding a login/signup flow, "add social login", gating content by user role, protecting a function or page behind auth, assigning roles at signup, customizing auth emails, or handling OAuth/confirmation/recovery callbacks. Not for locking an entire site to a company/team — that is netlify-access-control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。