「reviews」の検索結果

EU Compliance Officer for MiFID II investment firms and IDD insurance distributors. Implements compliance frameworks, ensures National Competent Authority reporting, conducts product governance oversight, manages suitability and appropriateness testing, reviews marketing and inducements, coordinates cross-border passporting compliance, implements GDPR data protection, conducts AML (5AMLD/6AMLD) monitoring, and prepares for NCA inspections. Use for compliance manual development, MiFID II/IDD implementation, or ESMA guideline interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit OpenClaw frontend code and rendered interfaces for Carapace drift, token misuse, primitive reimplementation, accessibility problems, responsive defects, and off-brand copy. Use for design reviews, compliance checks, or scheduled audit-and-fix workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

User segmentation and persona creation from mixed data sources — analytics, CRM, support tickets, reviews, or any combination. Use when asked to "build personas", "who are our users", "segment our users", "create user profiles", "define user archetypes", or "who is the target user".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feedback synthesis — cluster support tickets, NPS verbatims, app store reviews, and churn surveys by theme, separate signal from noise, and produce an actionable insight report. Use when asked to "synthesize this feedback", "analyze support tickets", "what are users complaining about", "NPS analysis", "churn feedback synthesis", or "what's the feedback telling us".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch download academic paper full-text (PDF/XML) from a list of DOIs. Handles 25 DOI prefixes across 19 publisher families via three layered routes: (1) publisher TDM APIs requiring institutional subscription (Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley Online, Springer Nature), (2) Open Access sources (Crossref, Unpaywall, OpenAlex), and (3) a browser-based fallback for paywalled publishers without TDM access (ACS, RSC, IEEE, AIP, IOP, APS, Annual Reviews, T&F, Chinese journals). Browser fallback offers two routes — Route A drives the user's logged-in Chrome via the OpenClaw `browser` tool with `profile="user"` (best for interactive sessions), Route B uses the standalone `auto-paper-harvester` CLI with its built-in Playwright (best for unattended bulk runs). Use when the user wants to harvest, scrape, fetch, or bulk-download papers from a DOI list, savedrecs export, or Excel; or wants to fill missing full-text PDFs for an existing literature collection. Triggers on phrases like "批量下载文献", "下载全文", "harvest papers", "scrape full text", "TDM API", "下载 Elsevier 全文", "Wiley 批量下载", "下载 PDF".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides Site Reliability Engineering best practices for SLOs, SLIs, SLAs, error budgets, toil reduction, reliability reviews, and capacity planning. Use when defining service objectives, measuring reliability, reducing toil, planning capacity, or when user mentions 'SRE', 'SLO', 'SLI', 'SLA', 'error budget', 'toil', 'reliability', 'on-call', 'capacity planning'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at write time to vector/embedding memory — Grove content-addressed insertion, chroma/pgvector upserts, memory-consolidation promoting session traces to MEMORY.md, or embedding externally-ingested content. Scores each candidate record against a fixed panel of sentinel queries and quarantines any record that would become the nearest neighbor of too many unrelated queries — a hub — whether from adversarial poisoning or accidental over-generality. This is the memory-record-side sibling of skill-injection-guardian (file-side) and the write-side complement of memory-use-warrant (read-side). Quarantine, never silently drop; a human reviews. Backed by the admission-time hubness gate (arxiv 2606.19692v1). Triggers on inserting into vector memory, consolidating memory, and embedding stranger content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code for bugs, style, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs or checking code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities using LLM reasoning and threat model patterns. Use for PR reviews, pre-commit checks, or branch comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic papers across arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Google Scholar, and more. Get BibTeX citations, download PDFs, analyze citation networks. Use for literature reviews, finding papers, and academic research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Python code across type safety, error handling, security, performance, modern patterns, design clarity, typed-boundary compliance, test quality, and documentation. Use when performing code review, PR review, pre-merge quality checks, or assessing Python for security vulnerabilities, bare except clauses, Any usage outside boundaries, or missing input validation at system boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Node.js runtime behavior in JavaScript or TypeScript, including server entrypoints, route handlers, middleware, streams, processes, dependencies, and environment configuration. Loads alongside language and CLI checks when applicable; investigates blocking I/O, backpressure, injection, lifecycle leaks, and misleading failure signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Python boundaries, typing, error handling, tests, dependencies, and supported-version idioms against the target project's contracts and active tools. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for Python source; uses Python-engineering standards when available and retains standalone checks otherwise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews skill, agent, and plugin artifacts against their intended consumer's schema and runtime contract. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for SKILL.md, agent definitions, or plugin manifests; checks discovery, frontmatter, triggers, tools, context cost, bundled references, and caller handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews browser-rendered HTML, CSS, JSX, TSX, JavaScript, and TypeScript for accessibility, XSS, forms, focus, rendering performance, styles, and lifecycle cleanup. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer when source or framework entrypoints establish frontend execution; composes with TypeScript checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews CLI application code for correctness and quality. Use when reviewing tools that use argparse, click, typer, commander.js, or similar argument parsers — covers exit codes, help flags, stdin/stdout/stderr separation, non-interactive operation, signal handling, argument validation, ANSI color safety, and dry-run support for destructive operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-refresh research entries in ./research/ using parallel research-curator agents. Use when /refresh-research is invoked, stale research needs updating, or bulk re-verification of research entries is requested. Inventories entries by review date and age, runs RT-ICA pre-flight, spawns agents in waves of 5, then validates, reviews, and commits through research-curator. Supports --all, --stale, --category, --layer, and --dry-run flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[AUTO-INVOKE] MUST be invoked BEFORE creating git commits, PRs, or code reviews. Covers Conventional Commits, PR templates, review requirements, and AI-assisted development rules. Trigger: any task involving git commit, git push, PR creation, or code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。