「risk」の検索結果

Screen US stocks for Stockbee-style selling-exhaustion hammer setups using prior momentum, pullback depth, undercut/reclaim, long lower-wick geometry, close-location, volume confirmation, quality/liquidity gates, and risk-distance scoring. Use when the user asks for Stockbee, Pradeep Bonde, exhaustion setup, selling exhaustion, hammer reversal, undercut reclaim, near-close reversal candidates, or pullback entries in high-quality funds-owned stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen US stocks for Stockbee-style short-term Momentum Burst setups using 4% breakout, dollar breakout, range expansion, volume expansion, prior range contraction, close-location, failure filters, and risk-distance scoring. Use when the user asks for Stockbee, Pradeep Bonde, momentum burst, 4% breakout, range expansion, dollar breakout, short-term swing momentum candidates, or 3-5 day burst setup review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local pre-trade checklist before manual order entry, blocking planless, oversized, revenge-risk, market-regime-blocked, or circuit-breaker-blocked entries while journaling the decision for trader-memory-core review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch official FXMacroData macro release-calendar events for trade planning, macro regime checks, and event-risk filters. Use before CPI, NFP, GDP, PCE, retail sales, PMI, and central-bank decision windows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Minervini-style breakout trade plans from VCP screener output with worst-case risk calculation, portfolio heat management, and Alpaca-compatible order templates (stop-limit bracket for pre-placement, limit bracket for post-confirmation). Use when user has VCP screener results and wants actionable trade plans with entry/stop/target levels and position sizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect IBD-style Distribution Days for QQQ/SPY (close down at least 0.2% on higher volume), track 25-session expiration and 5% invalidation, count d5/d15/d25 clusters, classify market risk (NORMAL/CAUTION/HIGH/SEVERE), and emit TQQQ/QQQ exposure recommendations. Use after market close, before TQQQ exposure changes, or as input to FTD/market-state frameworks. Does not execute trades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate account-level drawdown circuit breaker rules from trader-memory-core state and decide whether new trade risk is allowed today. Uses realized P&L, losing-streak cooldowns, and weekly/monthly drawdown limits without any external API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically review strategy drafts from edge-strategy-designer for edge plausibility, overfitting risk, sample size adequacy, and execution realism. Use when strategy_drafts/*.yaml exists and needs quality gate before pipeline export. Outputs PASS/REVISE/REJECT verdicts with confidence scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an employee advocacy program", "set up founder-led sharing", or "build a share kit for the team"; produces an advocacy program blueprint in two modes — participation-driven opt-in (default) or top-down assigned with its coercion and authenticity risks flagged — with a voluntary opt-in roster spec submitted as channel-registry proposal events, share kits with mandatory per-person variation, staggered human posting windows plus anti-pod guardrails (no coordinated identical reshares, no engagement rings), per-person material-connection disclosure lines per FTC and 《互联网广告管理办法》, and a Slack/Teams distribution spec. Not for paid creator campaigns — use campaign-planner. 员工倡导/创始人IP分享/内部分享计划/披露合规

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "pick a launch date", "plan the launch window", or "set the embargo and lift time"; produces a candidate-window comparison table (conflict / tailwind / risk per window) built from industry-event cycles and the competitor launch calendar, a launch-week vs rolling-release format call, store-review buffer padding (labeled Estimated), and an embargo window definition (lift moment + timezone) submitted to the launch registry as a candidate. Not for judging the cultural moment itself — use trend-spotter; not for launch-day execution — use launch-day-conductor. 发布择时/发布窗口/竞品日历/禁运期窗口/审核缓冲

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an AWS Security Agent threat model review on spec/design documents. Use when the user asks to review a spec for security, run a threat model, check if a design introduces security risks, review requirements.md or design.md for security posture changes, or STRIDE analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit wallet security by analyzing token approvals, permissions, and transaction patterns. Use when checking wallet security, reviewing approvals, or assessing risk exposure. Trigger with phrases like "audit wallet", "check approvals", "security scan", or "revoke tokens".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect current high-risk Adobe integration traps before they become production incidents. Use when the task requires adobe integration pitfall review. Trigger with "Adobe pitfalls", "review Adobe integration", or "find obsolete Adobe code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one-shot external recon into a continuous monitoring program. Covers the scheduled re-scan-and-diff loop (baseline snapshot -> interval sleep -> re-scan -> asset/finding delta -> threshold-gated webhook alert), the scan-to-scan diff engine (new/removed/changed assets by a tracked-attribute table, new/resolved findings by a stable cross-scan fingerprint), adversary CTI / chatter monitoring across six public feeds (ransomwatch, ransomware.live, HackerNews Algolia search, Reddit security-subreddit RSS, GitHub Gist code-search, public Telegram channel scraping) with a source-kind-aware severity engine (leak-site/forum/telegram/paste tiers, CRITICAL through INFO), literal/glob/regex watchlist pattern matching, full-corpus capture with retroactive rescan on new watchlist entries, infrastructure-tracking-over-time discipline (certificate-transparency, passive-DNS, port/service, and typosquat re-enumeration cadence, and what a genuine 'perimeter drift' event looks like in the diff output), a five-state finding-lifecycle state machine (open/triaged/risk_accepted/resolved/false_positive) with per-severity SLA and fingerprint-based cross-scan dedup and auto-resolve/reopen rules, the alert-fatigue trap where a lifecycle-unaware rule re-fires on an already-accepted finding, a durable retry/backoff alert-outbox pattern ('queued is not delivered'), and copy-paste bash-cron plus PowerShell-Scheduled-Task recipes for a re-scan+diff loop with the Slack-compatible webhook payload shape. Passive OSINT and analysis only -- no new active-intrusion technique. Use when setting up ongoing monitoring for a retainer or MSSP engagement, tuning alert thresholds to avoid fatigue, triaging a finding's lifecycle status, investigating adversary chatter about a brand, building a 'what changed on the perimeter since last week' report, or deciding whether a persisting finding should re-alert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify and release Three.js browser games: playtest QA, automated bot playtests, mobile and responsive checks, production builds, static-hosting base paths, debug gating, bundle review, screenshots, visual regression baselines, canvas-pixel inspection with measured metrics, and release risk reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM prompt injection playbook. Use when testing AI/LLM applications for direct injection, indirect injection via RAG/browsing, tool abuse, data exfiltration, MCP security risks, and defense bypass techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure file upload playbook. Use when testing upload validation, storage paths, processing pipelines, preview behavior, overwrite risks, and upload-to-RCE chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI/ML security playbook. Use when assessing model supply chain attacks (pickle RCE, poisoned weights), adversarial examples, model poisoning, model stealing, data privacy attacks (membership inference, model inversion), and autonomous agent security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product decision, or wants to de-risk a costly idea before investing in development. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday. For ongoing experimentation and MVPs, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For non-leading user interviews, see mom-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create irresistible offers using the Value Equation, bonus stacking, risk-reversing guarantees, and ethical scarcity. Use when the user mentions "grand slam offer", "make my offer more compelling", "what bonuses should I add", "guarantee strategy", "offer naming", or "people say its too expensive". Also trigger when packaging a product for higher perceived value, justifying premium pricing instead of discounting, designing a money-back guarantee, or structuring tiers to maximize conversions. Covers the MAGIC naming formula and starving-crowd targeting. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For outbound sales, see predictable-revenue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to pull SEC EDGAR data with the edgartools Python package — company lookup, filings, XBRL financial statements, and filing sections like Item 1A risk factors. Use whenever a task involves SEC filings, 10-K/10-Q data, or company financials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。