1,645 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect test smells, overmocking, flaky tests, and coverage issues. Analyze test effectiveness, maintainability, and reliability. Use when reviewing tests or improving test quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for security vulnerabilities. Use when the user says 'security review', 'security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'pentest the code', 'OWASP check', or any variation of wanting a security assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The order of operations for an Active Directory penetration test: setup, collection, exploitation, post-processing. Use this whenever you are planning or driving an AD assessment and need to know what to run before what and why (map before you exploit; harvest easy credentials before spraying to avoid lockouts; collect the graph before you reason about paths). Covers phase sequencing with standard tooling: netexec/nxc, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute, BloodHound CE. Invoke it at the start of an engagement, when deciding the next phase, or when a step feels out of order.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve code quality and maintainability through systematic identification of code smells and application of proven refactoring patterns. Use when the user requests refactoring or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aggregate a retort run's findings.jsonl into a machine-readable assessment.json summary with severity counts, penalty score, requirement coverage, and top findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mechanical Design Engineer. Use when a task calls for Mechanical Design Engineer judgment. Reasons from function, datum reference frames, and tolerance budgets; releases inspectable drawings and MBD through ASME Y14.5 GD&T, WC/RSS/Monte Carlo stack-ups, SAE J1739 DFMEA (Action Priority), and Boothroyd–Dewhurst DFM/DFA—not stress plots alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Manufacturing Engineer. Use when a task calls for Manufacturing Engineer judgment. Reasons from process physics, capability, and cost through Shercliff-Lovatt process selection, ASME Y14.5 GD&T, CAM simulation, and AIAG APQP/PPAP with MSA-gated SPC capability, treating high %GRR masquerading as variation, false Cpk on unstable or short runs, datum-scheme mismatch, and uncontrolled ECN tweaks as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Immunotherapy Scientist. Use when a task calls for Immunotherapy Scientist judgment. Reasons from antigen recognition and checkpoint circuits through CAR-T/bispecific design, ASTCT CRS/ICANS grading, flow cytometry release CQAs, iRECIST response assessment, COMPASS/TIDE biomarker modeling, and JACIE/FACT IEC accreditation while treating antigen escape, pseudoprogression, tonic signaling, and step-up CRS as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Hematologist. Use when a task calls for Hematologist judgment. Reasons from hematopoietic hierarchy, clonal evolution, and hemostatic balance through peripheral smear review, reticulocyte production index, flow cytometry, mixing studies, and WHO/ICC-anchored NGS and cytogenetics, while treating pseudothrombocytopenia, preanalytic line-draw and EDTA artifacts, and missed consumptive emergencies like TTP and DIC as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Ichthyologist. Use when a task calls for Ichthyologist judgment. Reasons from meristic fin formulae, sagittal otolith annuli/daily increments, larval flexion staging, and ICZN type discipline through Eschmeyer's Catalog, FishBase/WoRMS, MiFish/12S eDNA with blank controls, FSA/TropFishR/SS3 stock assessment, and Darwin Core museum metadata while treating CPUE catchability, unvalidated otolith ages, larval pigmentation loss, and eDNA false positives as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Genome Engineering (CRISPR) Scientist. Use when a task calls for Genome Engineering (CRISPR) Scientist judgment. Reasons from NHEJ/HDR/MMEJ competition and editor modality choice through CRISPick/CRISPResso2 guide design, LOCK/lssDNA and RNP HDR, base and prime editing (PE4/PE5, epegRNA), CAST-Seq/UDiTaS on-target SV assessment, clonal genotyping, and FDA/IBC-bound off-target and genome-integrity analytics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Fisheries Scientist. Use when a task calls for Fisheries Scientist judgment. Reasons from recruitment, growth, and natural and fishing mortality through state-space assessment models (SS3, SAM, JABBA), CPUE/GLM standardization, and reference points like F_MSY and B_lim under ICES and Magnuson-Stevens frameworks, while treating hyperstability, retrospective bias (Mohn's rho), unaccounted discard mortality, and misspecified M or selectivity as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Fluid Mechanics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Fluid Mechanics Engineer judgment. Reasons from Navier–Stokes reductions through Darcy–Weisbach/Crane TP-410 pipe networks, pump system curves, NPSH/affinity laws, HI turbomachinery selection, and ASME V&V 20 CFD validation when simulation supports design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Finite Element Analyst. Use when a task calls for Finite Element Analyst judgment. Reasons from discretization error, element technology, and constraint physics; runs mesh convergence and Richardson studies, Nastran/Abaqus/ANSYS workflows, RBE2/RBE3 and contact discipline, and ASME V&V 10 verification-before-validation reporting on governing QoIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Environmental Health Scientist. Use when a task calls for Environmental Health Scientist judgment. Reasons from source–pathway–receptor chains, classical vs Berkson exposure error, and tiered biomonitoring (NHANES/BEs); runs STROBE-grade epi, IRIS/OEHHA/ATSDR risk assessment, AERMOD/CALPUFF, EPHT/EJSCREEN, and HIA while treating surrogate misclassification, mobility bias, and detection≠harm as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Fluid Dynamicist. Use when a task calls for Fluid Dynamicist judgment. Reasons from Navier–Stokes and dimensionless scaling through RANS/LES/DNS selection, mesh/y+ strategy, OpenFOAM/Fluent workflows, and MMS + ASME V&V 20 / PIV validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Computational Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computational Scientist judgment. Reasons from Roache code/solution verification and ASME V&V 10/20/40 credibility through MMS/GCI, UQ ensembles, and Snakemake/Nextflow/CWL pipelines with conda-lock/Apptainer provenance while treating environment drift, workflow cache staleness, and validation-vs-calibration conflation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Developmental Psychologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Psychologist judgment. Reasons from developmental trajectories, measurement invariance, and familial-environmental context through age-normed instruments (Bayley, WPPSI/WISC, CBCL, MacArthur-Bates CDI), false-belief and violation-of-expectation paradigms, and lme4/lavaan growth models while treating verbal-demand confounding of theory of mind, informative attrition, adult-normed task misapplication, and parent-versus-direct-assessment divergence as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Applied Mathematician. Use when a task calls for Applied Mathematician judgment. Reasons from formulation-first modeling, Buckingham scaling, and asymptotics (matched expansions, boundary layers) through FEM/FVM numerics (FEniCS, PETSc, LAPACK), Tikhonov inverse problems, and ASME/Sandia V&V while treating ill-posed inversion, stiffness, and numerical diffusion as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。