Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and p...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
filename=shell.php, Content-Type: image/jpeg → server trusts Content-Type
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Hunt CORS Misconfiguration — origin-reflection with credentials, null-origin trust, subdomain-regex bypass (unanchored vs unescaped-dot vs prefix-only), pre-flight (OPTIONS) gating bypass, postMessage origin checks. High only when an attacker-controlled origin can perform a CREDENTIALED cross-origin read of sensitive data and you have proven it in a browser. Use when testing API endpoints, SPAs, or any app emitting Access-Control-* headers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Comprehensive secrets extraction methodology targeting CI/CD environments across all major platforms. Covers environment variable extraction from build contexts, exploitation of vault and secrets-manager misconfigurations (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager), runner and agent token abuse for lateral movement, OIDC federation attacks exploiting trust relationships between CI/CD providers and cloud platforms, build log leakage analysis for inadvertently exposed credentials, cache poisoning techniques for credential exfiltration, platform-specific credential store exploitation (GitHub Actions secrets, GitLab CI variables, Jenkins credential providers), service connection and service account abuse in Azure DevOps and GCP, and Docker registry credential theft from build environments. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1552 (Unsecured Credentials) and its sub-techniques. Each section provides enumeration procedures, extraction techniques, and post-exploitation pivoting guidance for usi...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
You are attacking Layer 2/3 infrastructure during an authorized internal engagement. ARP, DHCP, broadcast name resolution, VLAN trunking, and IPv6 autoconfiguration are all unauthenticated -- you exploit that trust to intercept credentials, redirect traffic, and cross network boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
LLM bugs are only worth reporting when they cross a trust boundary you can prove — an OOB callback, a verbatim-reproducible secret, a cross-tenant record, or code execution. A model 'saying something bad once' is confabulation, not a vulnerability. Read the False-Positive Gate before claiming anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Active Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
You are helping a penetration tester enumerate and exploit Active Directory
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt engineering that scales, AI UX that users trust, and cost optimization that doesn't bankrupt you. Use when: keywords, file_patterns, code_patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack☆ 22026年2月1日 更新
Manage Cloudflare DNS records, Tunnels (cloudflared), and Zero Trust policies. Use for pointing domains, exposing local services via tunnels, and updating ingress rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
johnalbertini14-glitch/openclaw-skills☆ 22026年2月26日 更新
Scan AI agent skills for security vulnerabilities — detects code injection, prompt injection, credential exfiltration, supply chain attacks, and 69+ threat patterns. Use when installing new skills, auditing existing ones, reviewing untrusted code, or validating packages before publishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
johnalbertini14-glitch/openclaw-skills☆ 22026年2月26日 更新
Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Designs, reconciles, and reviews an end-to-end Drydock program for safely staging agent runtimes: immutable worktree provenance, disposable VM containment, typed effect brokerage, global body accounting, resurrection, subscription-capacity economics, context compaction, operator control, evidence, and promotion. Use when several Drydock contracts must compose into one architecture, implementation hypertree, diagram set, or release plan. NOT for launching Port Daddy, running an untrusted subject, replacing focused containment/resurrection/capacity audits, or treating a design packet as runtime authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Adversarial reviewer for The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor and Bonded Commons. Probes federation-specific threats: trust transitivity, cross-harbor token forgery, federated revocation under partition, cross-harbor Sybil, cross-domain settlement, equivocation, bond-pool draining, cold-start joining, federation-operator Sybil. Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-whitehat. NOT for incident response, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use redteam-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Guides Cloudflare One Zero Trust and SASE work across Access, Gateway, WARP, Tunnel, Cloudflare WAN, DLP, CASB, device posture, and identity. Use when designing, configuring, troubleshooting, or reviewing Cloudflare One deployments. Retrieval-first: use current Cloudflare docs/API schemas instead of embedded product docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Use when wrangler deploys silently fail or produce wrong artifacts, secrets upload as empty strings, custom domain DNS is not resolving, route assignment broke after rename, observability/tail logs are needed, D1/KV/R2 bindings are missing, OAuth scope errors block a command, cookies on a redirect are not attaching, or the worker exceeds CPU time. Triggers: "Tenant or user not found", "Authentication error" on wrangler d1 push, secret length is 0 after upload, route returns origin not worker, "compatibility_date too old", 1101 errors, custom_domain assignment lost on script rename. NOT for AWS Lambda / Vercel Edge / Deno Deploy (different runtimes), Cloudflare Zero Trust, or R2-specific tuning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Add /compact command for manual context compaction. Solves context rot in long sessions by forwarding the SDK's built-in /compact slash command. Main-group or trusted sender only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail☆ 22026年4月3日 更新