8,868 件 ・ 関連度順
Guide for implementing code changes in AEM Edge Delivery Services. Handles block development (new or modified), core functionality changes (scripts.js, styles, delayed.js, etc.), or both. Use this skill for all implementation work guided by the content-driven-development workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Git workflow, branch strategy, and commit hygiene for the portfolio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate multi-step tasks across multiple skills for complex workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging workflow for errors, performance issues, and runtime problems in the portfolio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, run, and maintain tests using Vitest with proper isolation patterns and coverage targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize OpenCode IDE configuration and workflows for this portfolio
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve one exact official/current documentation gap when the user requests source verification or a version-sensitive API/SDK/provider/framework question can materially change the current decision; do not trigger for every implementation decision, ordinary framework code, local business logic, or broad research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, or evaluate repository Agent Skills when the user asks to write a SKILL.md, improve triggers or information hierarchy, restructure references/scripts/assets, or diagnose skill predictability; do not use for product code, AGENTS.md initialization, general prompt editing, or automatic repository-wide cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a bounded red-green-refactor feedback loop only when the user explicitly requests TDD, accepts reproduction-first proof for a bug, or an accepted high-risk behavior specifically requires red/green evidence; do not trigger for every logic, bug, behavior, or implementation change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and synthesize a source-grounded multi-paper literature review. Use for systematic literature reviews, survey matrices, inclusion/exclusion criteria, research gaps, or "review the literature on X" requests; do not use for reviewing one paper, ordinary web summaries, citation formatting only, or medical/legal conclusions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an explicit production launch, staged rollout, launch-monitoring, or rollback plan; do not trigger from AILI SHIP, implementation completion, packaging, review, or release wording that lacks a concrete launch/rollout target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build GLSL/WebGL/ShaderToy shaders and procedural visual effects such as SDF, ray marching, particles, and fluids.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or materially revise a repository-local test plan, QA plan, acceptance matrix, or regression checklist on explicit request or when one concrete testability gap blocks formal DEFINE; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, test execution, TDD, review, or completion claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one bounded adversarial pass when the user explicitly requests a report-style stress test or ROSE identifies a concrete material loophole in an existing strategy, spec, plan, review, or claim; do not trigger for an interactive grill/frontier interview or merely before write-back, implementation, reconciliation, or completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Silent failure hunting routing. Use when a change might pass while skipping work, swallowing errors, losing evidence, weakening gates, or reporting false success; do not use for broad code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or materially revise a durable specification when the user explicitly requests a spec/new feature contract or a named ambiguity requires formal DEFINE; do not trigger for ordinary bounded edits, implementation, task breakdown alone, review, or documentation of already-settled behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
将已有中文论文正文、报告、邮件、说明或 PPT 文案改得自然、减少 AI 腔与模板感；用于明确的“说人话”、自然化改写或论文 AIGC 风险段落处理，不用于自动润色所有回答、从零代写论文、英文改写、概念教学、事实核查、检测分数保证或 PPTX 文件生成。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform direct, bounded browser inspection through the `browser.qa` capability when the user requests runtime UI evidence or one browser-specific claim needs DOM/accessibility/console/network/visual verification; do not trigger for every UI change, backend work, delegated QA, or durable E2E artifact routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines raw ideas through structured divergent and convergent thinking for ordinary non-command brainstorming, idea shaping, options comparison, and explicit IDEATE deepening routed by `aili-delivery-flow`; do not use as the top-level `/ideate` command owner or for existing-plan stress-test, review, or completion-claim checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement an accepted change in bounded dependency-ordered increments when the user requests implementation and the scope benefits from multiple coherent slices; do not trigger merely because work touches multiple files, changes behavior, or is over an arbitrary line count.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update source-grounded documentation when the user explicitly asks for docs/ADR/onboarding material, a public contract change requires docs, or an accepted hard-to-reverse decision meets the ADR gate; do not trigger for every feature, architecture discussion, implementation, review, or SHIP request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI regression scouting routing. Use when agents, prompts, skills, model/tool routing, harness fixtures, or generated-output expectations change and need regression scenarios; do not use for ordinary product-code regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。