8,821 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design polished terminal UX for CLIs and TUIs. Use for setup flows, dashboards, tables, and actionable errors. NOT for web UIs, desktop windows, API schemas, or shell automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up @changesets/cli for semantic versioning, CHANGELOG generation, and npm publishing in a monorepo or single package. Covers init, config, contributor workflow, GitHub Actions release automation, and npm provenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add zod schema validation for CLI options and YAML/JSON config files. Generic pattern for runtime validation with type-safe parsing and clear error messages in any Commander.js CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive Chrome via the claude-in-chrome MCP to exercise plan.md::Verify steps for a shipped feature. Loads deferred MCP tool schemas, asserts console/network cleanliness, records a GIF for the PR. Used by the browser-verifier agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build FastAPI endpoints in the layered router → service → Supabase pattern, with Pydantic v2 schemas, JWT/admin gating, and consistent HTTPException-based domain errors. Use when adding/modifying any endpoint under backend/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add new capabilities or modify NanoClaw behavior. Use when user wants to add channels (Telegram, Slack, email input), change triggers, add integrations, modify the router, or make any other customizations. This is an interactive skill that asks questions to understand what the user wants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。