「apply」の検索結果

Use when you need to set up, review, or improve Java integration tests — including generating a BaseIntegrationTest.java with WireMock for HTTP stubs, detecting HTTP client infrastructure from import signals, injecting service coordinates dynamically via System.setProperty(), creating WireMock JSON mapping files with bodyFileName, isolating stubs per test method, verifying HTTP interactions, or eliminating anti-patterns such as Mockito-mocked HTTP clients or globally registered WireMock stubs. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for integration tests; Apply best practices for integration tests in Java code; Write Java integration tests with real infrastructure boundaries; Improve Testcontainers integration tests for Java code; Review integration test setup and teardown in Java projects. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or troubleshoot a Maven pom.xml file — including dependency management with BOMs, plugin configuration, version centralization, multi-module project structure, build profiles, or any situation where you want to align your Maven setup with industry best practices. This should trigger for requests such as Review pom.xml to improve it; Apply Maven best practices to pom.xml; Improve Maven POM configuration; Review Maven dependency management and plugin configuration; Modernize Maven build conventions for a Java project. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception contracts. Triggers include review Java OOD, refactor Java OOD, improve Java OOD, fix OOP misuse, and identify Java code smells. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java implementation work should be guided by Test-Driven Development, including maintaining a test list, choosing the next behavior, writing a failing test first, implementing only enough production code to pass, and refactoring while keeping tests green. This should trigger for requests such as Apply TDD; Use test-driven development; Drive this Java change with tests; Write the failing test first; Red-green-refactor this feature. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for type design quality — including establishing clear type hierarchies, applying consistent naming conventions, eliminating primitive obsession with domain-specific value objects, leveraging generic type parameters, creating type-safe wrappers, designing fluent interfaces, ensuring precision-appropriate numeric types (BigDecimal for financial calculations), and improving type contrast through interfaces and method signature alignment. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for type design; Improve type design in Java code; Fix primitive obsession in Java code; Create value objects in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Settle what domain terms mean per context, and which repository conventions or language standards (Go, Python) apply. Use when: names disagree or a rename is proposed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply timeless marketing and business principles to any problem. Use when someone needs strategic thinking, wants to evaluate a marketing decision, needs a framework for a tough choice, or mentions "first principles," "should I do X," "what would work here," or wants to think through a marketing problem systematically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When user is asking for guidance for which role to assign to an identity given desired permissions, this agent helps them understand the role that will meet the requirements with least privilege access and how to apply that role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply structured thinking before coding. Use when: starting new features, making architectural decisions, refactoring large components, or evaluating implementation approaches. Includes Musk's 5-step algorithm and ICE scoring framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Markdown linting and automated fixing using markdownlint-cli2. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Check markdown files for style issues, (2) Fix markdown formatting problems, (3) Ensure markdown follows best practices, (4) Validate markdown documents, or (5) Apply consistent markdown styling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when working with CSS, creating components, styling elements, refactoring styles, or reviewing CSS code. Triggers on "CSS", "styles", "Tailwind", "dark mode", "component styling", "semantic class", "@apply", "stylesheet". Routes to specialized sub-skills for creation, validation, or refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automation skill for Lovable deployments. Activates when: - yolo_mode: on in CLAUDE.md - Running /deploy-edge or /apply-migration commands - After git push when auto_deploy: on (automatic detection) - Any mention of "yolo mode", "automate Lovable", "browser automation", "Lovable MCP" Uses Lovable MCP (preferred) or browser automation to submit deployment prompts. Runs verification tests based on configuration. Auto-deploys after git push when enabled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integration skill for Lovable.dev projects. Activates when working with: - Lovable.dev projects with GitHub sync - Supabase Edge Functions that need deployment - Database migrations for Lovable Cloud - Projects with supabase/ directory structure - Any mention of "Lovable", "deploy edge function", "apply migration" Provides exact Lovable prompts for backend operations that can't be done via GitHub alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes from a clinical note the way a professional coder builds the claim. Use when users say "code this encounter", "assign ICD-10 codes", "what diagnosis codes apply", "code this chart", or when turning clinical documentation into claim-ready diagnosis codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assign CPT and HCPCS Level II procedure codes from clinical documentation the way a professional coder builds the claim. Use when users say "code this encounter for procedures", "what CPT codes apply", "assign HCPCS codes", "code this op note", or when turning visit notes or operative reports into claim-ready procedure codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the code and documentation simplification passes together over one scope, launching every review sub-agent concurrently before applying a single round of fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify all", "simplify everything", "simplify code and docs", "clean up code and docs", "run both simplify skills", or "simplify code and docs in parallel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the code and documentation simplification passes together over one scope, launching every review agent concurrently before applying a single round of fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify all", "simplify everything", "simplify code and docs", "clean up code and docs", "run both simplify skills", or "simplify code and docs in parallel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。