「check」の検索結果

Send, read, and respond to Telegram messages as Claudicle via the @claudicle_bot Bot API. Use this skill when sending Telegram messages (text, Markdown, inline keyboards), building approval gates with tappable buttons, checking the shared inbox for unhandled Telegram messages, answering callback queries, managing Telegram memory context, or checking bot and listener status. Five purpose-built scripts (send, check, status, callback, memory) wrap the python-telegram-bot v22 polling adapter at ~/.claudicle/adapters/telegram/ with REST-based senders (no asyncio). Pairs with /telegram-respond for the cognitive pipeline and with mazkir-callback-watcher.py for the Mazkir approval gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, responsive design, theming, and anti-patterns. Generate a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings. Report-only — documents issues for other skills to fix. Triggers on audit the design, check accessibility, technical review, performance audit, a11y check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Claude Code repositories. Two-phase workflow — Phase 1 sweeps 14 hygiene categories (permissions, hooks, CLAUDE.md bloat, Skills hygiene, process-abstraction, plus structural) and an optional 7-layer leak check. Phase 2 executes [APPROVED] markers from the report file. Use for repo cleanup, pre-distribution sanity, post-feature hygiene, environment audit, process-abstraction discovery. Trigger on "audit my CC repo," "sweep my repository for hygiene," "check this CC environment," "find process abstraction candidates," "review my CLAUDE.md," "clean up my .claude directory," "pre-distribution hygiene check," "find layer leaks in my CC setup." Routes structural findings to rootnode-cc-design REMEDIATE. Composes with rootnode-critic-gate. CC-only — does not scan Claude Projects. Do NOT use for building a Skill (use rootnode-skill-builder), compiling a prompt (use rootnode-prompt-compilation), scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation), or auditing a Project (use rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive audit of a user's entire Claude environment — combines Project audit (six-dimension Project Scorecard, seven anti-patterns) with Global audit (six-dimension Global Layer Scorecard) plus Cross-Layer Alignment Check across all nine layers and Evolutionary Recommendations across four pathways. Produces a unified action plan. Use when user says "full audit of everything," "audit my entire Claude setup," "full stack audit," "comprehensive review of my project and preferences," "check everything," or wants the complete health check of both a specific Project AND their global configuration. Also use when a project audit reveals cross-layer issues that require full-stack visibility. Do NOT use for auditing only a Project (use rootnode-project-audit if available) or only global layers (use rootnode-global-audit if available). Do NOT use for single prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply GitHub repository security protections tier by tier — rulesets, read-only Actions token, secret scanning + push protection, Dependabot, and (gated) required status checks / required PR with a GitHub App bypass for a CI auto-commit bot. Mutating and confirmation-gated: always assess first, apply the no-regret baseline, then decide required checks separately. Use when hardening a public user-owned repo after an audit, when a repo has no branch protection, when adding required checks without breaking a bot that pushes to the default branch, or when provisioning a GitHub App bypass actor for trusted automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify document completeness for each bureaucratic step of an EU/DACH relocation, flagging missing items and translation requirements. Use after creating a relocation plan and before beginning bureaucratic procedures, when preparing for a specific appointment (Buergeramt, Finanzamt), when unsure which documents need certified translation or apostille, after receiving a rejection or request for additional documents, or as a periodic check during the relocation process to ensure nothing has been overlooked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and verify a hiking gear checklist optimized for season, duration, difficulty, and group size with weight management. Covers the ten essentials, layering systems, navigation tools, emergency kit, and group gear distribution. Use when preparing for a day hike or multi-day trekking tour, packing for a group and distributing shared gear, adapting a standard gear list to specific conditions, reviewing gear before departure, or managing pack weight for long or technical routes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

.github/workflows/*.yml を自動解析し、CI で定義されたチェックをローカル実行する汎用スキル。 lint・fmt・test・build・audit 等に限定せず、ワークフローの run ステップを抽出して実行する。 エラーがあれば修正し、再実行して確認する。 Use when: CI を通したい、lint/test を実行したい、CI チェックしたい、 ワークフローをローカルで試したい。 Triggers: "CI", "ci-check", "lint", "test", "format", "fmt", "audit", "チェック", "検証", "CI 通して", "テスト実行", "ビルド確認"

Open GitHub Issues for human input and respond to the researcher team. Use this skill whenever you need to handle a human_issue event, respond to human issues, ask humans a question, or check team communications. Also triggers for: "any human messages?", "check issues", "respond to humans".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform code review on staged changes or a pull request. Checks for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and best practices. Use when user says "review code", "check my code", "review PR", or "is this code okay". Optional +check flag validates findings via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit checklist based on OWASP Top 10 and best practices. Covers authentication, injection, XSS, CSRF, secrets management, and more. Use when reviewing security, before deploy, asking "is this secure", "security check", "vulnerability".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform code review on staged changes or a pull request. Checks for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and best practices. Use when user says "review code", "check my code", "review PR", or "is this code okay". Optional +check flag validates findings via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit checklist based on OWASP Top 10 and best practices. Covers authentication, injection, XSS, CSRF, secrets management, and more. Use when reviewing security, before deploy, asking "is this secure", "security check", "vulnerability".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and fix AI-generated writing patterns (slop). Comprehensive detection with 50+ patterns across 3 severity tiers, structure weighted above lexical tells, scoring system, and editor mode that directly fixes problems. Use when scanning any content for AI tells, auditing drafts before publishing, checking if writing "sounds like AI", humanizing AI-generated text, or verifying content authenticity. Trigger on "check for slop", "does this sound like AI", "humanize this", "AI audit", "slop check", "clean up AI writing", or any request to detect/remove artificial-sounding patterns. Also use proactively before publishing any AI-assisted content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the NowStack Mobile setup checker as a strict read-only contract. Use for `/ns check`, configuration readiness, external account status, production preflight, or machine-readable setup evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI compliance checking systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-compliance-checker related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI accessibility checking. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-accessibility-checker related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create ADA compliance checklists for construction. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ada-compliance-checklist related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create accessibility checklists for web applications. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with accessibility-checklist related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the UI and style files changed in the working tree against this repo's own design system, before they are saved or committed. Runs the same deterministic check as the CLI's --check flag (no tokens, about a second): hardcoded colours where a token exists, near-identical colour twins, off-scale spacing, radii, font sizes and shadows, typefaces outside the system, arbitrary Tailwind values, static inline styles, !important, duplicate component definitions and imports of the copy to avoid, new tokens that copy an existing one, chart colours written by hand where the repo keeps a chart palette (and one calm warning asking for a palette where it keeps none), on a repo built on MUI, Mantine, Chakra or Ant Design, colours or pixel sizes written onto kit components where the theme has a value, and on a Tailwind theme or a shadcn repo, palette classes such as text-gray-500 where the theme names a colour of that kind. Findings name the file, the line and the fix. This is the small, fast check for what just changed; the roast skill is the full scan of the whole repo with a report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent tasks on a Volcengine (火山引擎) cloud phone via the Mobile Use Agent OpenAPI. Use when the user asks to drive, automate, operate, or test an Android app on a cloud phone for enterprise use cases (e.g. reply to WeCom customer messages, add leads in a CRM, clock in on DingTalk, check invoicing stats, query inventory in a supply-chain app, ship e-commerce orders, approve OA requests) or personal ones (open 小红书 and search, place an order, check nearby places on a map), or to check status, fetch result, cancel, or list a Mobile Use run. Requires one-time setup to store Volcengine AK/SK locally; ProductId and PodId can be saved as a default device during setup, the user prompt is provided per run. Supports optional GPS injection (GpsInfo) with user consent (auto-asked only for location-related tasks).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to update their project's CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, verify their Claude Code setup, or check for improvements to their project configuration. Triggers on requests like: "update my project docs", "verify my claude setup", "check my project configuration", "audit my .claude directory", "improve my CLAUDE.md", "is my setup correct", "/update-project", "/verify-project", or "/check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。