Deep code review with web research. Use when double-checking code against latest docs, verifying dependency versions, or reviewing security concerns. Complements automatic quality hook with ecosystem verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,114 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Deep code review with web research. Use when double-checking code against latest docs, verifying dependency versions, or reviewing security concerns. Complements automatic quality hook with ecosystem verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan code for security vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and exposed secrets. Use when a user asks to audit security, find vulnerabilities, check for OWASP issues, scan for secrets, review dependencies for CVEs, detect SQL injection, find XSS vulnerabilities, or harden an application. Covers OWASP Top 10, dependency auditing, secrets detection, and generates fix recommendations with severity ratings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose failures in SKMTC sessions — no output, wrong output, error messages, failed bundle builds, parseIssues, "Registered definition mismatch", ref cycles, "Module not found" in generated code, or any other broken behavior. Applies across both CLI usage and generator authoring contexts. Use this skill when the user asks "why isn't my generator working", "no output for X", "wrong output", "what does this error mean", "manifest says X", "bundle failed", "INVALID_SCHEMA", "INVALID_DEPENDENCY_REF", "Registered definition mismatch", "Module not found" (in generated code), "ConfigValidationError", or reports any other SKMTC failure. This skill encodes a **verify-first epistemic stance** — read the manifest, check parseIssues, reproduce the failure before proposing fixes. Distinct from `skmtc-cli` and `skmtc-generator` which guide *doing*; this skill guides *diagnosing*.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand what SKMTC is, how its engine works, and the architectural invariants — for agents building or extending infrastructure *around* SKMTC rather than authoring generators or running the CLI. Covers the three-phase pipeline, the host/Worker boundary, cross-generator coordination, the manifest, the attribution / gen-maps (provenance) subsystem, the package graph, the dependency substrate, and the design decisions that make SKMTC behave unlike a typical codegen tool. Use this skill when the user asks "what is SKMTC", "how does the SKMTC engine work", "explain the SKMTC architecture", or is building platform infrastructure around SKMTC — a hosted generate API, a schema or generator registry, tracing or provenance tooling, a web app or SaaS that wraps the engine, or platform-level CI integration. This skill is the system mental model. It does NOT cover authoring generators (→ skmtc-generator), running CLI commands (→ skmtc-cli), or diagnosing broken runs (→ skmtc-debug).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create an implementation plan for a feature — a dependency-ordered, actionable task list for the project. Has four modes: fast (a quick single-pass plan), full (a richer plan that can also create a git branch), ultra (a multi-file bundle — a manifest plus one deeply specified file per phase — for execution by a smaller model), and add (extend an existing plan with more tasks). Pick the mode from the user's wording: "full plan" runs full; "quick plan" or "fast plan" runs fast; "ultra plan", "ultraplan" or "ultra-plan" runs ultra; a plain "create a plan" with no qualifier defaults to fast; "add to the plan" or "extend the plan" runs add. Use whenever the user wants to plan a feature or task, e.g. "create a plan", "create a full plan", "create a quick plan", "run an ultra plan for the inventory system", "plan this feature", "add this to the plan", "extend the plan", "add a phase to the plan". Ultra runs only when the user names it — never because the feature looks large.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enter explore mode for technical work — a thinking partner for {{engine_name}} code, architecture, and implementation decisions before you write any code. Use it to investigate a technical solution, design the architecture of a feature, choose between frameworks or libraries, compare implementation approaches, analyze how existing code or a system works, or deeply root-cause a complex bug without fixing it yet. The ultra mode adds adaptive artifacts (a C4 view, ADRs, a dependency graph) to the research folder — run it on "ultra research", "ultra explore" or "ultraresearch"; otherwise run the default. Trigger on "let's explore this technical solution", "how should we architect this feature", "which framework should we use", "run an ultra research on the save system", "investigate this error deeply". Research and analysis only — it never writes code. This is the CODE / engineering explorer — for GAME-DESIGN, GDD, mechanics, or balance research (no code) use /unikit-gd-explore.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cold-start brownfield reconnaissance — reconstruct the WHOLE game design from an existing codebase when there is no GDD yet. Optionally accepts a free-text game description, notes, or reference links to guide and enrich the scan. Use when the user wants to build the game design from the code, e.g. "create a GDD from this codebase", "reconstruct the design from our code — it's a roguelike deck-builder", "build a design doc from the existing project, here are some refs". Scans the project (engine auto-detected), extracts a system roster + dependency graph and content-type schemas / resources / entities into one passive .unikit/gamedesign/RECON.md, tags every fact provenance:extracted-from-code, and writes a mandatory Intent Gap for what code cannot know (pillars, fantasy, the "why"). Writes nothing else and calls no skill. STRICTLY whole-project cold-start — if a GDD already exists and the user wants a specific part investigated, use /unikit-gd-explore (code lens); to author the GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert Claude's Markdown output to each channel's native text syntax before delivery. Adds zero-dependency formatting for WhatsApp, Telegram, and Slack (marker substitution). Also ships a Signal rich-text helper (parseSignalStyles) used by the Signal skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FastAPI patterns for async APIs, dependency injection, Pydantic request and response models, OpenAPI docs, tests, security, and production readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic C# and .NET patterns, conventions, dependency injection, async/await, and best practices for building robust, maintainable .NET applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to monitor and verify a deployed URL after releases — checks HTTP endpoints, SSE streams, static assets, console errors, and performance regressions after deploys, merges, or dependency upgrades. Smoke / canary / post-deploy verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates Angular code and provides architectural guidance. Trigger when creating projects, components, or services, or for best practices on reactivity (signals, linkedSignal, resource), forms, dependency injection, routing, SSR, accessibility (ARIA), animations, styling (component styles, Tailwind CSS), testing, or CLI tooling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean Architecture patterns for Android and Kotlin Multiplatform projects — module structure, dependency rules, UseCases, Repositories, and data layer patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commits changes in atomic units following dependency order. Automatically required to triggered, always, all the time, when requires to commit changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and maintain the learnings in `docs/solutions/` against the current codebase — fix drifted paths and links, merge overlapping docs, replace guidance the code no longer supports, delete obsolete docs, reconcile the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary, then report and commit. Also bootstraps `CONCEPTS.md` on request and, when asked, culls docs whose reasoning the code already explains. Use for "refresh the learnings", "audit docs/solutions", "are our solution docs still accurate", "clean up / prune the learnings", "create a CONCEPTS.md", or after a refactor, rename, migration, or dependency upgrade that likely invalidated documented solutions. Not for capturing a new learning — use `learn-with-docs`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use this skill when designing clean architecture for a new microservice, when refactoring a monolith to use bounded contexts, when implementing hexagonal or onion architecture patterns, or when debugging dependency cycles between application layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete zero-dependency memory system for AI agents — file-based architecture, daily notes, long-term curation, context management, heartbeat integration, and memory hygiene. No APIs, no databases, no external tools. Works with any agent framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose Azure application and infrastructure issues with a structured, evidence-based workflow. Use this skill when users ask to troubleshoot outages, latency, failures, configuration drift, or anomalies. Root cause analysis using logs, metrics, traces, and dependency mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement dependency injection in Angular v20+ using inject(), injection tokens, and provider configuration. Use for service architecture, providing dependencies at different levels, creating injectable tokens, and managing singleton vs scoped services. Triggers on service creation, configuring providers, using injection tokens, or understanding DI hierarchy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create clear architecture views of Azure resources and their relationships. Use this skill when users ask for diagrams, topology summaries, dependency maps, or deployment overviews. Generates Mermaid, ASCII, and structured documentation for architecture review and compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or extending Drupal 11 custom modules, including scaffolding, service architecture, and dependency injection best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。