「development」の検索結果

在实现任何功能或修复 bug 时使用，在编写实现代码之前

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当在当前会话中执行包含独立任务的实现计划时使用

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当实现完成、所有测试通过、需要决定如何集成这份工作时使用

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain specification for a personal daily monitoring dashboard. Defines all target panels (email, Feishu, Office, social, news, Twitter, code status, schedule, stock market, daily finance), their data sources, APIs, and priority ordering for incremental development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and reviews structured Lean 4 proofs and designs Lean libraries following Mathlib conventions. Use when proving theorems in Lean, formalizing mathematics or specifications in Lean 4, defining new types or definitions in a Lean library, reviewing Lean proofs for readability and maintainability, refactoring long tactic proofs into lemmas, filling in sorry placeholders in a Lean development, setting up CI or linters for a Lean project, diagnosing slow proofs or maxHeartbeats timeouts, or writing custom tactics, macros, or linters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates devcontainers with Claude Code, language-specific tooling (Python/Node/Rust/Go), and persistent volumes. Use when adding devcontainer support to a project, setting up isolated development environments, or configuring sandboxed Claude Code workspaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas. Use when securing a smart contract end to end rather than hunting one bug, checking a project on every check-in or before deployment, triaging a Slither report, or asking where to start on smart contract security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phishing campaign execution methodology for authorized red team engagements. Covers end-to-end campaign lifecycle: infrastructure provisioning (GoPhish, SMTP relay configuration, domain acquisition and aging, SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment), payload delivery vectors (Office macro weaponization, HTA droppers, ISO/IMG container abuse, LNK shortcut hijacking, OneNote embedded payloads, HTML smuggling), email authentication bypass techniques (SPF softfail exploitation, DKIM replay attacks, display name spoofing, homoglyph and cousin domain registration), credential harvesting with MFA bypass (EvilGinx2 transparent proxy, Modlishka session relay, pixel-perfect HTML cloning), spear phishing pretext development informed by OSINT, email security gateway evasion, QR code phishing (quishing), and callback phishing for initial access. Integrates with GoPhish for campaign management, EvilGinx2 for adversary-in-the-middle credential interception, King Phisher for template design, and the Social Engineering Toolkit for payload generation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1566 (Phishing) and sub-techniques T1566.001 (Spearphishing Attachment), T1566.002 (Spearphishing Link), T1566.003 (Spearphishing via Service). Assumes you have written authorization and a defined scope before any campaign execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shellcode development reference for offensive security engagements. Use when writing custom x86/x64 shellcode, implementing position-independent code (PIC), building shellcode loaders, evading AV/EDR detection, or converting PE files to shellcode. Covers null byte avoidance, API hashing, encoder/decoder patterns, staged vs stageless payloads, Windows PEB traversal, and cross-platform shellcode techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a task and must decide WHO does it — yourself, a spawned subagent, or another agent in the topology that already holds the context. The rule: how much would a blank slate have to read in to do this correctly? A lot → route to a context-holding agent; a little → subagent; unsure → a real agent or yourself. NOT the mechanics of fanning out (that's dispatching-parallel-agents / subagent-driven-development) — this is the who/whether decision, and the failure mode that makes teams abandon subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective review of a feature plan or requirements doc before development begins. Evaluates from strategy, design/UX, and engineering angles to catch gaps early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when translating a specific event, policy change, macro shock, or industry development into public-equity issuer, sector, earnings, valuation, positioning, and portfolio implications. Do not use for standalone macro strategy, rates, FX, credit, futures, or generic market commentary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and distribute Expo development clients locally or via TestFlight

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Cloudflare platform skill covering Workers, Pages, storage (KV, D1, R2), AI (Workers AI, Vectorize, Agents SDK), networking (Tunnel, Spectrum), security (WAF, DDoS), and infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Pulumi). Use for any Cloudflare development task. Biases towards retrieval from Cloudflare docs over pre-trained knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create user stories with Mike Cohn format and Gherkin acceptance criteria. Use when turning user needs into development-ready work with clear outcomes and testable conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a structured PRD that connects problem, users, solution, and success criteria. Use when turning discovery notes into an engineering-ready document for a major initiative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities". Do NOT use for accessibility (use web-accessibility), SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive multi-area audits (use web-quality-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitates deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding. Offers interactive learning exercises after architectural work (new files, schema changes, refactors). Use when completing features, making design decisions, or when user asks to understand code better. Triggers on "learning exercise", "help me understand", "teach me", "why does this work", or after creating new files/modules. Do NOT use for urgent debugging, quick fixes, or when user says "just ship it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your pathfinder for navigating unknown codebases. Investigates with precision, implements surgically, and never assumes — if it doesn't know, it says so. Maintains a .notebook/ knowledge base that grows across sessions, turning every discovery into lasting intelligence. Summons available skills, MCPs, and docs when the mission demands. Use when fixing bugs, implementing features, refactoring, investigating flows, or any development task in unfamiliar territory. Triggers on "fix this", "implement this", "how does this work", "investigate this flow", "help me with this code". Do NOT use for greenfield scaffolding, CI/CD, or infrastructure provisioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, modifying, or reviewing code — implementation tasks, code changes, refactoring, bug fixes, or feature development. Do NOT use for architecture design, documentation, or non-code tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。