「how to use」の検索結果

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' or 'should I offer a free plan.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge or how to structure their plans. For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'how do I launch this,' 'launch checklist,' 'GTM plan,' or 'we're about to ship.' Use this whenever someone is preparing to release something publicly. For ongoing marketing after launch, see marketing-ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture or review how this project connects to external systems (GitHub, AWS, npm, SSH, etc.) so future sessions know the auth recipe. Auto-detection hook logs candidate captures to an inbox; this skill promotes them to permanent recipes in `.planning/AUTH-RECIPES.md` and optionally to user-global memory at `~/.claude/auth-recipes/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to reach the platform REST API — where prod and dev live, where the API token is (.env), how to authenticate with curl, and how to fetch the OpenAPI spec listing every endpoint. Use whenever you need to read or edit course/homework/project/registration data, or inspect real prod data while debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design expansion revenue playbooks — upsell triggers, seat expansion sequences, tier upgrade paths, and cross-sell motions. Use when asked to "grow existing customers", "increase NRR", "design upsell", or "how do we get customers to expand".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to design a user flow, map how a user moves through a feature, create a wireframe or flow diagram, or document interaction design for a product brief. Examples: "design the flow for X", "map out the user journey", "create a wireframe for this feature", "how should the UX work for this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate onboarding documentation — what this project does, how to set up locally, where things live, key decisions, how to deploy. Written for day-one engineers who know nothing. Use when asked for "onboarding docs", "new engineer guide", "how to get started", or "developer setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts a systematic related-work / literature-survey / state-of-the-art review for a research question by defining survey dimensions, searching each axis, building a taxonomy of prior work, identifying the gap, and producing a positioning narrative for a paper's Related Work section. Goes beyond a flat paper list to deliver structured analysis. Use when the user is starting a new research project and needs to map the landscape, asks "what's been done on X?" or "how does my idea compare to existing work?", needs to write or revise a Related Work / Background / Prior Art section, wants to identify a research gap or position their contribution, or asks to build a taxonomy of approaches in a research area.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understanding how digital systems actually work -- hardware, operating systems, networks, and information representation -- at a depth sufficient to reason about them rather than just use them. Covers CPU/RAM/storage/GPU roles, what an OS does, how packets travel the internet, and how computers represent numbers, text, images, and sound as binary. Use when a learner needs to build a mental model of computing rather than memorize menu paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this appropriateness check the moment you are about to integrate a retrieved long-term memory — a Grove content-addressed hit, a chroma/pgvector neighbour, a memory-consolidation digest, or a MEMORY.md line — into a response, especially anything touching private origins, Fox Companies IP, credentials, or Center Camp / consent-governed content. It answers a question intent-router never asks: not WHAT to fetch or HOW, but WHETHER a correctly-retrieved item should reach output. Relevance is not appropriateness — a perfect similarity match can still be a boundary violation. Default is FAIL-CLOSED: if in-context authorization is uncertain, the memory may inform behaviour but must not be surfaced. Backed by RBI-Eval (arxiv 2606.06055v1). Triggers on surfacing recalled sensitive memory into a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to determine which backlog backend a project is configured to use, and what to do with the answer. Use when about to call a backend-specific tool, choosing between a GitHub-only and a Beads-native operation, or reporting which store a result came from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US web development firms — building, refreshing, or rebuilding marketing sites, landing pages, ecommerce, WordPress/Webflow/Shopify, headless CMS, microsites, and web frontend work. Triggers on "find a web developer for a marketing landing page", "shortlist three Webflow agencies in California", "rebuild our ecommerce site on Shopify", or "pull contact info for these 8 web dev shop domains", even when described indirectly (redesign and rebuild our site, ship a microsite). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-software-developer for custom backend/API/mobile/internal-tool work — anything beyond a website. Defer to find-marketing-agency when scope spans broader marketing beyond the build. Skip in-house web-engineer hires, "how do I build X" DIY questions, hosting/CMS-product comparisons, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US SEO agencies — technical SEO, on-page/off-page, link-building, content-led SEO, local SEO, ecommerce SEO, B2B SEO, and SEO audits. Triggers on "find me an SEO agency in Texas", "shortlist three technical SEO consultancies for SaaS", "link-building and on-page for our ecommerce store", or "pull contact info for these 8 SEO firm domains", even when described indirectly (organic traffic flat, improve Google rankings, search visibility). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings, third-party listings. Defer to find-marketing-agency when scope spans multiple marketing services beyond SEO. Skip SEM/PPC/paid-search asks, web-dev asks (use find-web-developer), "how do I rank" DIY questions, SEO tool recommendations (Ahrefs, Semrush), in-house SEO hires, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate Specification Know-How: load the SpecBook format contract, the SpecBook schema configuration of the project, and the list of specification (SPEC) artifacts into the context, so the specification can be read, queried, explained, and edited ad-hoc in plain conversation. Use *automatically* whenever the user wants to work with the specification files -- asks what the "spec" or "specification" says, wants to "look up", "query", "check", or "explain" specification content, or wants a small ad-hoc change to it -- and no dedicated specification skill (`ase-spec-edit`, `ase-sync-import`, `ase-sync-reconcile`, `ase-sync-export`) is invoked, as those activate the know-how implicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for GraphQL schemas, persisted queries, RPC manifests, generated clients, OpenAPI drift, hidden operations, and contract-to-handler mismatches. Use when the user asks to inspect GraphQL or RPC requests, compare client contracts to live handlers, recover hidden operations, trace generated clients, or explain how schema or contract drift produces the decisive behavior. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to author one new tdmcp MCP tool the house way — the file shape (XImpl + registerX), the Python-bridge pattern (buildPayloadScript/parsePythonReport over executePythonScript), the result helpers (errorResult/guardTd/jsonResult/structuredResult), fail-forward error handling, ESM/.js + Biome style, and the offline msw unit test that proves it. Load this whenever building, extending, reviewing, or testing a tdmcp tool file under src/tools/** (and its test under tests/unit/**). Use it for every Phase-13 / v0.5.0 feature-build tool and any re-run after a gate failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。