「loop」の検索結果

Automated Big-O complexity analysis of code and algorithms. Performs static analysis of loop structures, recursive call trees, space complexity estimation, and amortized analysis with detailed derivation documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LangChain ReAct agent implementation with tool binding for reasoning and action loops

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Human-in-the-loop integration for LangGraph workflows with approval and intervention points

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SONA self-optimizing neural architecture with ReasoningBank trajectory learning, EWC++ anti-forgetting, and reinforcement learning feedback loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Language-specific auto-lint/format/typecheck pipeline. Supports Python (ruff+pyright), TypeScript (prettier+eslint+tsc), Go (gofmt+golangci-lint). Auto-fix and convergence loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting and remediation loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions. Use for /figure-it-out or 'figure it out'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when designing commands, lifecycle steps, or processing loops that run amid crashes, restarts, and retries. Converge to the same end state regardless of partial prior runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs an app on the user's own screen — a native desktop application (instrument control software, Origin, GraphPad, ImageJ, a reference manager, a spreadsheet), or a desktop browser window that needs window-level control. Read before the first `computer` call. Covers the observe-act-observe loop, why element indexes go stale, which action to prefer for which control, what "unverified" means and why it must never be reported as success, and the recovery for each error code. Not for page-level web automation (use the browser connector) and not for anything that can be done from the shell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to process documentation by running baseline without skill, writing to address failures, iterating to close loopholes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a task with sub-agent implementation and LLM-as-a-judge verification with automatic retry loop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master modern JavaScript with ES6+, async patterns, and Node.js APIs. Handles promises, event loops, and browser/Node compatibility. Use PROACTIVELY for JavaScript optimization, async debugging, or complex JS patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED or two consecutive rounds turn up nothing new (fallback cap 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold and run a reproducible Monte Carlo simulation study in R — a declared assumption regime, a parameterized DGP, an estimator grid, a seeded replication loop, and a summary of bias, RMSE, empirical SE, coverage, size/power with Monte Carlo standard errors. Use when the user says "run a Monte Carlo simulation", "simulation study", "check the bias/coverage of an estimator", "compare estimators in simulation", "size and power simulation", "Monte Carlo experiment", or wants to demonstrate an estimator's finite-sample properties. Produces a numbered R script in `scripts/R/` and saves per-replication raw results + a summary table to `output/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-cause a failing or wrong empirical result with a disciplined reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix loop, instead of guessing-and-poking. Use when the user says "why is my regression wrong", "this number changed", "my script errors out", "the result won't reproduce", "debug this", "this estimate looks wrong", or "it worked yesterday". Tuned for research code (R/Stata/Python): type coercion, NA/merge blow-ups, factor levels, clustering/SE choices, weighting, collinearity/convergence, seeds, package-version drift. Use `--no-fix` to localize the root cause without editing shared or load-bearing files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via --peer --stress; reviewer-disposition variance reporting via --peer --variance N. Auto-invokes /review-r + /audit-reproducibility on referenced scripts unless --no-cross-artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a new TikZ diagram from the snippet gallery with prevention rules pre-applied (explicit node dimensions, coordinate map, directional edge labels). Compiles standalone, invokes tikz-reviewer with citations from tikz-measurement.md, and loops on revisions until APPROVED.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, track and update team goals via the Deeplake virtual filesystem at memory/goal/. Use whenever the user mentions a goal, objective, target, milestone, or asks to track progress on something measurable. ALSO use when the user says "task", "todo", "work item", "remind me to", "fix X", or any actionable work item — the goal system replaced the legacy `hivemind tasks` CLI and now covers both objectives and tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, track and update team goals in Hivemind via the `hivemind` CLI. Use whenever the user mentions a goal, objective, target, milestone, or asks to track progress on something measurable. ALSO use when the user says "task", "todo", "work item", "remind me to", "fix X", or any actionable work item — the goal system replaced the legacy `hivemind tasks` CLI and now covers both objectives and tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what's the architecture / which subsystems exist?", "what's the impact of changing this?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the local AST-derived code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) for structural codebase questions — what calls X, what does Y import, where is Z defined, blast radius of a change. The graph rebuilds automatically after each agent turn; use hivemind_graph_search and hivemind_graph_neighborhood tools (no manual build step).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what is the architecture / which subsystems exist?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。