「modeling」の検索結果

Designs QC, corrects signal drift, removes batch effects, filters features, normalizes samples, and imputes missing values for untargeted LC-MS/GC-MS metabolomics, framing each step as a measurement model that can create or erase biological signal. Use when processing a peak/feature table before statistical analysis, choosing a drift-correction or sample-normalization method, deciding QC RSD vs D-ratio filtering, or handling left-censored missing values. The feature table is produced by metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing or metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing; transformation/scaling for modeling defers to metabolomics/statistical-analysis; cross-study design issues link to experimental-design/batch-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and applies 3D pharmacophore models using RDKit Pharm3D, the apo2ph4 receptor-based workflow (Heider et al 2022/2023 J Chem Inf Model 63:147-158), Pharmer / Pharmit (search), and PharmacoForge (diffusion-based generation, Flynn et al 2025 Front Bioinform), covering ligand-based pharmacophore (from active set alignment) and receptor-based pharmacophore (from binding pocket geometry). Explicit handling of feature types, geometric tolerances, partial matching, and pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Use when identifying scaffold-hopping candidates, building shape-and-feature search queries, or transferring SAR across chemotypes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement server APIs, authentication, and application data access. Schema modeling and query tuning use oma-db.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert risk manager specializing in comprehensive risk assessment, mitigation strategies, and compliance frameworks. Masters risk modeling, stress testing, and regulatory compliance with focus on protecting organizations from financial, operational, and strategic risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design author-friendly content structures that work for non-technical content creators. Use when designing content structures for blocks in AEM Edge Delivery Services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shakes your mental models with critical rigor, challenges assumptions, exposes blind spots, and provides multi-perspective insights as a strict thinking mentor. Deliberately breaks format conventions to stimulate genuine cognitive discomfort. Use when you want to stress-test an idea, shake your mental model, ask to challenge my assumptions, find blind spots, deepen my thinking, or request critical review with phrases like yusaburi or what do you think of this plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch effect correction for CRISPR screens covering ComBat empirical-Bayes, RUV, SVA, control-sgRNA normalization, and the model-based alternative of including batch as a covariate in MAGeCK MLE or Chronos. Covers screen-specific batch sources (passage cohort, library lot, infection day, sequencing run, Cas9 lot, FBS lot), PCA + variance-decomposition diagnostic to decide if correction is needed, when correction harms biology by over-correcting condition into batch, limma removeBatchEffect for visualization-only correction, and relationship to multi-condition design matrices. Use when combining screens for joint analysis, when passage cohort confounds biology, when DepMap-style panels need Chronos with batch covariates, when picking ComBat vs RUV, or when correction harms biology and should be replaced with explicit covariate modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and analyze pangenomes for prokaryotes (Panaroo, PPanGGOLiN, PEPPAN, GET_HOMOLOGUES, anvi'o pangenomics) and eukaryotes (Minigraph-Cactus, PGGB, vg pangenome graphs). Implement Tettelin core/accessory/cloud genome decomposition (Tettelin 2005), Heap's law open/closed pangenome modeling, gene presence/absence GWAS (Scoary, pyseer), pangenome graph variant calling (vg, PanGenie), and structural-variation graph indexing. Use when assembling species- or genus-level pan-gene catalogs, separating core from accessory/shell/cloud genes, testing gene-content associations with phenotypes, building pangenome graphs from haplotype-resolved assemblies, calling SVs from pangenome graphs, or selecting between bacterial-pangenome and eukaryotic-pangenome workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconcile gene trees against a species tree under probabilistic models of duplication, transfer, and loss (DTL) using ALE (Szöllősi 2013 amalgamated likelihood), GeneRax (Morel 2020 ML reconciliation), AleRax (Morel 2024 co-estimation), Whale.jl (Bayesian DTL+WGD), RANGER-DTL 2 parsimony, NOTUNG, ecceTERA, and Treerecs. Use when inferring ancestral gene-family content, distinguishing duplication from horizontal transfer from differential loss, rooting deep species trees from gene-content signals (STRIDE / Williams 2017 ALE-rooting), counting DTL events per branch, refining noisy gene trees against a species tree, modeling WGD events jointly with DTL, or producing publication-grade gene-family histories for phylogenomic / comparative analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infer integer allele-specific copy number, tumor purity, and ploidy from tumor sequencing by jointly modeling read depth (logR) and B-allele frequency (BAF) with ASCAT, Sequenza, FACETS, PURPLE, and PureCN (tumor-only). Covers the purity-ploidy identifiability problem, the diploid-baseline (dipLogR) anchor, major/minor copy number, loss of heterozygosity, sunrise/contour fit diagnostics, and reconciliation of conflicting fits. Use when tumor analysis needs absolute copy number rather than relative log2, when estimating purity and ploidy, calling LOH or copy-neutral LOH, resolving whole-genome doubling, running tumor-only allele-specific calling, or choosing among ASCAT, Sequenza, FACETS, and PureCN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs logistic regression for clinical trial outcomes (binary, ordinal, multinomial) with marginal-vs-conditional estimand reporting per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance, g-computation/standardisation for marginal effects, modified Poisson for RR, Brant test for proportional odds, Firth penalty for separation, and Hauck-Donner detection. Use when modeling binary or ordinal endpoints in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and applies 3D pharmacophore models using RDKit Pharm3D, the apo2ph4 receptor-based workflow (Heider et al 2022/2023 J Chem Inf Model 63:147-158), Pharmer / Pharmit (search), and PharmacoForge (diffusion-based generation, Flynn et al 2025 Front Bioinform), covering ligand-based pharmacophore (from active set alignment) and receptor-based pharmacophore (from binding pocket geometry). Explicit handling of feature types, geometric tolerances, partial matching, and pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Use when identifying scaffold-hopping candidates, building shape-and-feature search queries, or transferring SAR across chemotypes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds QSAR / QSPR models using chemprop D-MPNN, MolFormer, Uni-Mol, ChemBERTa, random forest baselines, and Gaussian processes with explicit handling of OECD 5 principles, applicability domain (kNN, leverage, conformal prediction, Mahalanobis), scaffold-balanced splits, ensemble uncertainty, calibration (Platt, isotonic), feature importance (SHAP, atomic attribution), and prospective validation. Use when building target-specific predictive models from in-house bioassay data, ADMET endpoints, or selectivity profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Segments the genome into chromatin states from combinatorial histone modification and chromatin factor ChIP-seq data. Uses ChromHMM (multivariate HMM on binarized signal, v1.27), Segway (Dynamic Bayesian Network on continuous signal), EpiSegMix (flexible-distribution HMM with duration modeling, 2024), EpiLogos (multi-biosample visualization), IDEAS (cell-type-aware joint), and full-stack ChromHMM (Vu Ernst 2022) for cross-cell-type segmentations. Handles state-count selection (15 vs 18 vs 25 states), binarization choice, OverlapEnrichment / NeighborhoodEnrichment downstream analysis, and cross-biosample integration. Use when learning chromatin states from a histone mark panel, characterizing learned states by genomic feature enrichment, or comparing chromatin landscapes across cell types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides and generates complete CRUD workflows for Spring Boot 3 services. Creates feature-focused architecture with Spring Data JPA aggregates, repositories, DTOs, controllers, and REST APIs. Validates domain invariants and transaction boundaries. Use when modeling Java backend services, REST API endpoints, database operations, web service patterns, or JPA entities for Spring Boot applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "model agent mental states", "implement BDI architecture", "create belief-desire-intention models", "transform RDF to beliefs", "build cognitive agent", or mentions BDI ontology, mental state modeling, rational agency, or neuro-symbolic AI integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh the Key Metrics table in a thesis with current data from Financial Modeling Prep, with a Quartr standardized-statement tie-break for Revenue Growth / Gross Margin gaps (Step 4b-Q) and a scoped web-search fallback (Step 4b) when FMP has no data or resolved the wrong company. Use when user says "numbers", "refresh metrics", "update key metrics", or "refresh [TICKER]" with no other action implied. Surgical edit only — does NOT create research notes or propagate via /sync. Also flags (never auto-edits) stale price/valuation framing in the thesis Summary — see Step 10b.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh the Key Metrics table in a thesis with current data from Financial Modeling Prep, with a scoped web-search fallback (Step 4b) when FMP has no data or resolved the wrong company. Use when user says "numbers", "refresh metrics", "update key metrics", or "refresh [TICKER]" with no other action implied. Surgical edit only — does NOT create research notes or propagate via $sync. Also flags (never auto-edits) stale price/valuation framing in the thesis Summary — see Step 10b.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull an earnings call transcript from Financial Modeling Prep, extract qualitative signal (management commentary deltas, hedging shifts, Q&A tone), and produce a thesis-delta-first Research note. Use when user says "transcript", "pull earnings call", "transcript diff", or "ingest [TICKER] earnings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。