「planning」の検索結果

Query, inspect, or refresh codebase intelligence files in .planning/intel/

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface Claude's assumptions about a phase approach before planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze codebase with parallel mapper agents to produce .planning/codebase/ documents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a trivial task inline — no subagents, no planning overhead

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this skill for ANY future-oriented question. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", "Can [X] succeed?", "What's the future of X?", foresight analysis, scenario planning, STEEEP analysis, futures cone, prediction requests, or any question about a future outcome. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. Also activate when the user says "predict", "forecast", "what are the odds", "scenario analysis", or asks about competitive races, technology adoption, geopolitical shifts, or market dominance. REQUIRES web search to be enabled — if web search is unavailable, tell the user before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Portfolio dashboard for all GSD-tracked projects. Scans ~/Projects and ~/gsd-workspaces for .planning/ directories, shows phase status, git state, blockers, and next actions for every project. Run /ops projects to see the full portfolio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes an AI agent's ethos.md — a durable snapshot of its purpose, intended behavior, boundaries, and success criteria — from the answers gathered by ethos-explore. Renders the schema-v1 template, validates the front matter and required markdown sections, saves the file in the agent's repository, and reviews it with the user. Also edits an existing ethos.md. Use over generic planning skills for an agent's ethos.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan NVIDIA Parabricks pbrun commands, translate CPU options and check runtime readiness. Use for individual tools, including planning-only questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, debugging, tuning, evaluating, exporting, or deploying public Nemotron `embed`/`rerank` retrieval recipes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when measuring Jetson Video Codec SDK or PyNvVideoCodec encode/decode throughput, comparing presets or surfaces, testing codec-worker capacity with authenticated samples and user media, or producing a clearly labeled documentation-derived planning estimate when representative media is absent. Also use for a video request limited to PSNR or SSIM, to apply the terminal scope response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, executing, and independently validating Jetson Video Codec SDK or PyNvVideoCodec encode/decode, transcode, segmentation, container decode, AV1, or concise acceptance workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, `gofmt -r`, `gopatch`), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code smell blocks a feature, or the user asks to refactor Go code — also for renaming at scale, extracting functions or interfaces, moving code between packages, or planning a multi-step refactor. Target styles owned elsewhere → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` (renames), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-project-layout` (splits), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-modernize` (idioms), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style` (control flow), `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns` (patterns/DI).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Repository vocabulary unclear or inconsistent: project terminology alignment workflow: look up, capture, correct, and align the words a repository uses before planning or handoff. Use when the user says: ulw-context, project terminology alignment, review project terms, align project terminology, terminology this project uses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Deep dive before a decision: deep research engine - grounding for specs and decisions: study open-source reference implementations with pinned refs, gather live web evidence with citation discipline, verify contested claims, and distill a decision-grounding dossier that planning consumes; for a decision brief use research-brief, for upstream guidance use web-research. Use when the user says: research plan, literature review, research literature, review recent papers, deep research, deep-research, exhaustive research, saturation research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Software feature or bugfix not yet planned: structured planning before execution. Use when the user says: plan, implementation plan, make a plan, write a plan, write the plan, task breakdown, safe feature, safely add a feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Team minutes, retros, and decision history to keep: meeting minutes, scrum/sprint records, retros, decisions, and follow-up history. Use when the user says: operating-rhythm, operating rhythm, meeting minutes, meeting history, scrum record, sprint planning, sprint review, sprint retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create text-driven visuals in Markdown: charts, diagrams, cards, architecture and page layouts. Charts and analytical views (bar, line, pie, heatmap, correlation, regression); reliability and operations (latency, incident, throughput, cycle time, OKR, standup, on-call); product and finance (funnel, retention, revenue, budget); process and workflow (approval, BPMN); software design and behaviour (class, state machine, sequence, C4); dependencies and impact (dependency graph, ER, causality); system architecture as HTML (layer stack, wings, zones, topology, service catalogue, request paths); infrastructure (cloud, Kubernetes, ETL, network, security, IAM, compliance); governance and people (ArchiMate, org chart, hiring); knowledge and planning (mind map, roadmap, Gantt, migration); documents (comparison, SWOT, memo, policy, catalogue, case study). Use when a document needs a diagram, chart or card. Figures render live. Not for slide decks or math notation. Not recommended: mermaid / canvas / drawio / dot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaching a customer how to choose before any candidates appear, when they ask what matters in a category, how two approaches to it differ, or where to begin. Not needed once the customer has named the thing they want, however considered the purchase (that is search work), nor for outfitting a space or an event (planning-goals).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms a rough idea into a detailed design document with implementation plan. Follows Prompt-Driven Development — iterative requirements clarification, research, design, and planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select the appropriate planning, implementation, or debugging workflow for an app project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix a reproducible failure in an existing project. Use for crashes, broken behavior, or failing checks, not greenfield planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert product strategy covering market analysis, competitive positioning, go-to-market planning, and product-led growth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。