「ref」の検索結果

Reconstructed reference notes on EASA acceptable means of compliance for airborne software and airborne electronic hardware, built from AMC 20-115D (ED Decision 2017/020/R, AMC-20 Amendment 14, consolidated in Amendment 23) and AMC 20-152A (ED Decision 2020/010/R, AMC-20 Amendment 19, consolidated in Amendment 23), read from the Easy Access Rules AMC-20 compilation (Amendment 23, June 2023) and pinned 2026-09-26. Use for EASA software means of compliance, EASA AEH means of compliance, AltMoC, ETSO software, and the joint software and hardware certification workflow. SCOPE LIMITS: the two AMC sections only; no FAA content (use faa-8110-49); no RTCA DO-178C or DO-254, EUROCAE ED-12C or ED-80, or supplement clause text (use avionics-signpost to name them); no Part-21 body; no bulk AMC-20; AMC 20-193 and AMC 20-189 are name-only; reflects Amendment 23 as consolidated in the June 2023 EAR, not a later AMC-20 amendment; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not the official AMC. LICENCE: per-document (EASA site reproduction-with-acknowledgement grant, qualified by ED Decision all-rights-reserved footers); pack-level commercial use is not granted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstructed reference notes on US FAA approval guidance for airborne software and airborne electronic hardware, built from four public-domain sources (FAA Order 8110.49A, AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, AC 00-69; documents dated 2017-07-21 to 2022-10-07, pinned 2026-10-12). Use for how FAA certification staff plan and conduct software reviews (certification liaison, desk versus on-site review, review planning agreements), how the level of FAA involvement (LOI) is picked and scored with the Appendix A worksheets, how software conformity inspection works (software part and installation conformity, ASE and ASI tasks, Form 8120-10), what AC 20-115D recognizes and how DO-178B processes and tool qualification transition to DO-178C/DO-330 (supplements, FLS, UMS, legacy software changes), and what AC 20-152A adds for airborne electronic hardware (simple versus complex custom devices, robustness and HDL code coverage, tool assessment, previously developed hardware, COTS IP, COTS devices, circuit board assemblies), and what AC 00-69 adds as best practices for change impact analysis, data and control coupling, and design-level error handling (best practices, not guidance and not a means of compliance). SCOPE LIMITS: FAA guidance only, and guidance is not regulation (ACs are acceptable means, not the only means); no RTCA DO-178C or DO-254, EUROCAE ED-12C or ED-80, supplement, or SAE ARP text, which are copyrighted and named only (see the avionics-signpost pack); no AC 00-72 (named, not packed); no DO-178C software-level objective tables; no EASA AMC 20-115D or AMC 20-152A content (use easa-rules); reflects the pinned source dates, not later FAA actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not a substitute for the source documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. 105).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect a reference (web URL, image, PDF, screenshot) and propose a candidate Style for the workspace. Use when the user says "save this style", "guarda este estilo", or shares a reference and wants to reapply it later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a refactor as a sequence of tiny safe commits via interview and codebase exploration. Use when restructuring working code, or when the user says 'plan a refactor'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews the instructions text and skills of a declarative agent, with its stated capabilities, knowledge sources and audience, for prompt-injection exposure, data-leakage paths, over-broad permissions and missing refusals, and returns an attack-surface map, a findings table with severity, quoted evidence and attack path, one pasteable fix per finding, a probe pack the owner can run and a refusal-coverage table. Use when the user asks to "red-team this agent", "check these instructions for prompt injection", "could this agent leak data", "review the permissions on my agent" or "what should this agent refuse". Do not use for checking a SKILL.md against the format rules, use skill-file-reviewer instead; do not use for designing the launch test set, use agent-evaluation-plan instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit BMAD source files for file-reference convention violations using parallel Haiku subagents. Use when users requests an "audit file references" for a skill, workflow or task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to update, refresh, or reinstall the CopilotKit agent SKILLS (the SKILL.md files that teach this agent about CopilotKit). NOT for updating the CopilotKit codebase or project — this is specifically about refreshing the skills/knowledge this agent has loaded. Triggers on "update copilotkit skills", "update skills", "refresh skills", "skills are stale", "skills are outdated", "get latest skills", "my copilotkit knowledge is wrong", "copilotkit APIs changed", "skills seem old", "wrong API names", "reinstall skills", "skills not working right", "update your copilotkit knowledge".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a custom WooCommerce payment gateway — extend WC_Payment_Gateway, declare $id / $title / $supports, implement process_payment returning array(result, redirect), optionally process_refund when refunds is in supports, register via the woocommerce_payment_gateways filter. The single most-confused thing AI gets wrong is payment_complete vs update_status — payment_complete runs the canonical paid-order state machine (status, transaction id, session flag, woocommerce_payment_complete action), update_status only changes the status string. Includes the always-forgotten WC cart empty_cart call after success. Use when integrating a payment provider, reviewing gateway code, or debugging "payment succeeded but cart didn't clear" / "order stuck in pending". Triggers on WC_Payment_Gateway, woocommerce_payment_gateways, process_payment, process_refund, payment_complete, get_return_url, woocommerce_payment_complete_order_status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect and manage Elementor MCP servers as "MCP Apps" on NV oOS assistants — official Elementor MCP (application passwords, permission inheritance, enable/revoke flows), third-party Elementor MCP plugins, the Pro MCP Apps metabox/slash-command/REST surfaces, the Remote Sites "MCP Server" connection type with assistant connection_ref references, auth-type mapping (basic vs header vs oauth), the host allowlist (Security Center setting, constant, filter), tool discovery/bridging into chat, and troubleshooting (allowlist 403s, restricted hosts, protocol fallback, negative discovery cache, same-site in-process bridge, missing connection_ref). Use when connecting an assistant to Elementor MCP, creating a Remote Sites MCP Server connection, using /mcp-app, fixing Test Connection or Discover Tools failures, allowlisting an Elementor host, or debugging bridged elementor_* tools missing from chat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate SEO research with Ahrefs -- analyze backlink profiles, research keywords, track domain metrics history, audit organic rankings, and perform batch URL analysis through the Composio Ahrefs inte

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility skill for referral program. Use when a user or upstream workflow invokes this name; route the task to `referrals` while preserving the requested scope and source-specific intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy, or refresh outdated content. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' 'sharpen the messaging,' 'refresh this content,' 'update this page,' 'this content is outdated,' or 'content audit.' Use this when the user already has copy and wants it improved or refreshed rather than rewritten from scratch. For writing new copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates exhaustive technical references and API documentation. Generates comprehensive parameter listings, configuration guides, and searchable reference materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in viral growth and referral marketing with access to referral program data and third-party tools. Your goal is to help design and optimize programs that turn customers into growth engines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

リファクタリングを「更新されたチームの理解と、コードが表現する過去の理解の差分同期」と捉え、今回得た新知識（要求・ドメイン知識・制約）が naming と responsibility へ反映されているか、boundary が現在の understanding を表現しているか、diff の削除行やコメントに現れる過去の design history と constraint を失っていないかを diff-time で確認する。Knowledge Delta の signal は diff（追加/削除された hunk・コメント・ADR 参照）を一次情報とし、PR 本文が供給されるときは補助に用い、不確実なら question に留める。ドメイン用語の一貫性は ubiquitous-language-naming、集約/コンテキスト境界の設計判断は bounded-context-language、投機的抽象化・caller special-case は altitude-generalization、スコープ逸脱/前提破壊は fix-scope-integrity、振る舞い変更と構造変更の分離は behavior-structure-separation、完了主張の反証は refactor-claim-audit へ委譲する

敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 （Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing）と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual 検出3パターン（Self-Contradiction / Refactor-Claim Audit / Cross-File Leakage）へルーティングし、通常のレビューでは見えない設計の盲点・ 防御の穴・論理の弱点・宣言と実装のズレを可視化する。

リファクタリング（構造変更）と機能変更（behavior change）が同一 diff に混在していないかを識別し、structural change に対する external behavior preservation の証拠（テスト・型・静的解析）が揃っているかを diff-time で確認する。証拠不足のときは Characterization Test 追加を促すか question とする。DTO/公開 API の破壊的変更検出は api-compatibility、完了主張の反証や抽出リファクタの性能特性退行は refactor-claim-audit、新知識の命名・責務・境界への反映は knowledge-to-code-alignment、投機的抽象化・スコープ逸脱は altitude-generalization / fix-scope-integrity へ委譲する

FlutterSecureStorage (v10.x) for encrypted key-value storage of sensitive data using platform-native secure enclaves with biometric authentication support. Use this skill when storing OAuth tokens (access tokens, refresh tokens, ID tokens), API keys and secrets, user passwords or PINs, session tokens, encryption keys, private keys for cryptography, certificate data, biometric enrollment data, banking credentials, health data, or any sensitive information requiring platform-level encryption (iOS Keychain with Secure Enclave, Android Keystore with Hardware-backed keys). Supports Touch ID, Face ID, and Android biometric prompt integration. Handles biometric change invalidation (resetOnError), data migration from SharedPreferences/EncryptedSharedPreferences, Google Drive backup exclusion, automatic key rotation, configurable encryption algorithms (AES), and prevents data extraction even on rooted/jailbroken devices. Essential for authentication flows, secure credential management, or compliance requirements (PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR data protection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI 动效参考库，帮你给产品加上合适的动画。不需要懂动效 — 描述你的产品场景（页面加载慢、用户点了没反应、想让页面高级一点），直接推荐方案 + 代码。触发词：页面没动画、交互没反馈、怎么加动效、让页面动起来、加载太慢怎么办、想让产品高级一点、motion ref。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute large refactor or rewrite efforts efficiently with parallel multi-agent analysis and implementation. Use when a user asks to refactor many files, split workstreams, analyze a target code area, and coordinate sub-agents with clear ownership and dependency-aware execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and run Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) training on preference datasets using the Tinker API. Use when the user wants to train with preference data, chosen/rejected pairs, or DPO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。