Protobuf schema design, streaming patterns, interceptor chains, deadline propagation, and error handling for gRPC services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,669 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Protobuf schema design, streaming patterns, interceptor chains, deadline propagation, and error handling for gRPC services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Java coding standards for Spring Boot services: naming, immutability, Optional usage, streams, exceptions, generics, and project layout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build event streaming and real-time data pipelines with Kafka, Pulsar, Redpanda, Flink, and Spark. Covers producer/consumer patterns, stream processing, event sourcing, and CDC across TypeScript, Python, Go, and Java. When building real-time systems, microservices communication, or data integration pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API design and implementation across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and tRPC patterns. Use when building backend services, public APIs, or service-to-service communication. Covers REST frameworks (FastAPI, Axum, Gin, Hono), GraphQL libraries (Strawberry, async-graphql, gqlgen, Pothos), gRPC (Tonic, Connect-Go), tRPC for TypeScript, pagination strategies (cursor-based, offset-based), rate limiting, caching, versioning, and OpenAPI documentation generation. Includes frontend integration patterns for forms, tables, dashboards, and ai-chat skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement Azure cloud architectures using best practices for compute, storage, databases, AI services, networking, and governance. Use when building applications on Microsoft Azure or migrating workloads to Azure cloud platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement production-ready service mesh deployments with Istio, Linkerd, or Cilium. Configure mTLS, authorization policies, traffic routing, and progressive delivery patterns for secure, observable microservices. Use when setting up service-to-service communication, implementing zero-trust security, or enabling canary deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Linux systems covering systemd services, process management, filesystems, networking, performance tuning, and troubleshooting. Use when deploying applications, optimizing server performance, diagnosing production issues, or managing users and security on Linux servers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure host-based firewalls (iptables, nftables, UFW) and cloud security groups (AWS, GCP, Azure) with practical rules for common scenarios like web servers, databases, and bastion hosts. Use when exposing services, hardening servers, or implementing network segmentation with defense-in-depth strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering. USE FOR: .NET architecture choices; layer and domain boundary review; service decomposition; clean architecture, vertical slice, DDD, CQRS, and modular monolith decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query construction, result-graph tracking, bulk writes, DbContext lifetime or overlapping operations, search semantics, paging, raw SQL, and model/index coverage. Use whether or not EF Core owns the schema. For EF Core, not Dapper or raw ADO.NET.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET. USE FOR: working on ASP.NET Core apps, services, or middleware; changing auth, routing, configuration, hosting, or deployment behavior; deciding between ASP.NET Core sub-stacks. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ManagedCode.Communication when a .NET application needs explicit result objects, structured errors, and predictable service or API boundaries instead of exception-driven control flow. USE FOR: integrating ManagedCode.Communication into services or APIs; replacing exception-driven result handling with explicit results; reviewing service boundaries that return. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or review gRPC services and clients in .NET. USE FOR: ASP.NET Core gRPC, protobuf contracts, unary or streaming RPC, gRPC client factory, interceptors, deadlines, cancellation, channel reuse, backend service integration. DO NOT USE FOR: broad browser-facing APIs without gRPC-Web tradeoff review, SignalR realtime hubs, plain REST APIs. INVOKES: dotnet build/test and focused service or client smoke checks when code changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI-enabled .NET applications with Semantic Kernel using services, plugins, prompts, and function-calling patterns that remain testable and maintainable. USE FOR: adding AI-driven prompts, plugins, or orchestration to a .NET app; reviewing kernel construction, service registration, or plugin usage; building function-calling. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for configuring dependency injection in .NET MAUI apps — service registration in MauiProgram.cs, lifetime selection (Singleton / Transient / Scoped), constructor injection, Shell navigation auto-resolution, platform-specific registrations, and testability patterns. USE FOR: "dependency injection", "DI setup", "AddSingleton", "AddTransient", "AddScoped", "service registration", "constructor injection", "IServiceProvider", "MauiProgram DI", "register services", "BindingContext injection". DO NOT USE FOR: data binding (use maui-data-binding), Shell route configuration (use maui-shell-navigation), unit-test mocking frameworks (use standard xUnit and NSubstitute patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides creation and modification of ASP.NET Core Web API endpoints with correct HTTP semantics, OpenAPI metadata, and error handling. USE FOR: adding new API endpoints (controllers or minimal APIs), wiring up OpenAPI/Swagger, creating .http test files, setting up global error handling middleware. DO NOT USE FOR: general C# coding style, EF Core data access or query optimization (use optimizing-ef-core-queries), frontend/Blazor work, gRPC services, or SignalR hubs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Share state between components that don't have a direct parent-child parameter relationship, using cascading values, scoped services with change events, or CascadingValueSource via DI. USE WHEN the user needs a CascadingParameter or CascadingValue that works across render mode boundaries, a shopping cart or notification count accessible from multiple pages, a theme or user preference cascaded app-wide, or when components in different parts of the tree must react when shared data changes. Also USE WHEN cascading values aren't reaching interactive children in per-page interactivity mode, or when the user needs to understand scoped vs singleton service lifetime for state on Blazor Server. DO NOT USE for direct parent-child parameter passing or EventCallback (see author-component), for persisting state across prerender-to-interactive transitions (see support-prerendering), or for service abstractions for data fetching in Auto/WebAssembly (see fetch-and-send-data).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design Microsoft Orleans systems from each primitive's purpose and failure model. USE FOR: grains, digital twins, state versus databases, transactions, messaging, streams, timers, reminders, Durable Jobs, stateless workers, grain services, startup, and hosting. DO NOT USE FOR: other actor stacks, batches, relational-only CRUD, or advice without an Orleans decision. INVOKES: inspect version and topology, choose the primitive, implement, and validate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Volcengine cloud resources using the Volcengine CLI (`ve` command). Supports all Volcengine services including ECS, VPC, CLB, RDS, Redis, and more. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to create, query, modify, or delete cloud resources on Volcengine, mentions the `ve` command, says "volcengine CLI", or describes infrastructure tasks such as "create an ECS instance", "set up a VPC", "list security groups", "allocate an EIP". Also trigger when the user encounters errors from `ve` commands and needs troubleshooting help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to write unit tests for Micronaut applications — Mockito-first with @ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class), @MicronautTest with @MockBean, HttpClient @Client(/) assertions, @Property overrides, @ParameterizedTest, and *Test vs *IT naming. For framework-agnostic Java use @131-java-testing-unit-testing. This should trigger for requests such as Add or improve unit tests in a Micronaut project; Reduce unnecessary @MicronautTest usage with Mockito-first tests; Write Mockito-first unit tests for Micronaut services; Mock Micronaut bean collaborators in unit tests; Review fast Micronaut tests without application context. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support financial entities, critical ICT services, third-party ICT provider integrations, or operational resilience obligations under DORA. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for DORA ICT risk controls; Design operational resilience evidence for a financial service; Add incident, continuity, backup, recovery, or third-party ICT controls; Assess resilience testing and monitoring before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise products, services, libraries, agents, plugins, connected components, or platform modules that may qualify as products with digital elements and need EU Cyber Resilience Act secure-by-design, vulnerability handling, security update, SBOM, product documentation, or release-readiness controls. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing Java enterprise evidence for MiFID II investment services, investment activities, client classification, suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, best-execution evidence, algorithmic-trading governance evidence, market-access governance evidence, transaction evidence, record keeping, monitoring, or compliance-owner handoff. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java investment-service platform for MiFID II evidence; Assess suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, or best-execution evidence; Document audit, monitoring, or clock-synchronisation gaps for algorithmic-trading governance; Assess investment-service engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Digital Markets Act gatekeeper-platform concerns, core platform services, interoperability, business-user data access, consent-dependent data combination, ranking, self-preferencing, advertising transparency, or anti-circumvention controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for DMA controls; Design interoperability and business-user data access evidence; Add ranking, consent, preference, or anti-circumvention audit controls; Assess gatekeeper-platform engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。