「what」の検索結果

Wiki-first "what do I use" lookup - pick the automated TOOL (wiki/tools/), then the PAYLOAD/technique (wiki/payloads/ + wiki/cheatsheets/), for a surface/service/vuln-class BEFORE hand-rolling or working from memory. Use for "tool for <service>", "automated tools for web/<service>", "what should I run on <surface>", "which tool for <X>", "payloads for <X>", "payload arsenal", "cheatsheet for <X>", "how do I exploit <tech/class>", "exploit/attack chain for <X>", "arsenal", any SSRF/XSS/SQLi/SSTI/LFI/JWT/XXE/IDOR/NoSQL/deserialization/CSRF/CORS/CRLF/GraphQL/smuggling/web-cache/OAuth/SAML/MFA/crypto/LDAP/XPath/WebAuthn/file-upload/IMDS/prompt-injection/Modbus ask, plus "privesc arsenal", "CVE arsenal", "default creds", "nuclei templates", "sqlmap/hydra/nmap/bloodhound", "password attacks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm a story idea", "I have an idea for a story", "what if", "develop a premise", "is this idea strong enough", "workshop my logline", "premise", "story concept", "what should I write", "short story or novel", "novella or novel", "name my book", "title ideas", or has a spark (an image, a character, a setting, a question) and wants to turn it into a tested premise before starting a story project. NOT for the controlling idea or theme of an existing story (use theme-craft).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go outside the founder brief and research the real market before the plan is written: the exact communities, newsletters, and venues where the user's ICP already sits, how comparable products launched and what worked, the problem in strangers' own words, and the rivals and openings the user never mentioned. Saves docs/gtm-cofounder/market-research.md with a link for every finding. Use right after start-here and before strategy-and-roadmap, before picking channels in first-50-users or planning launch-it, or whenever the plan feels like it only repeats what the user already said.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture structured feedback on the Han skills and agents used in the current session and optionally post it as a GitHub issue to testdouble/han. Use at the end of any session where one or more han-* skills or agents ran, to rate a run, log what worked and what didn't, or submit observations for maintainers. Does not review code, investigate bugs, or research options; use code-review, investigate, or research for those. Does not provide feedback on skills or agents from non-Han plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when ranking backlogs, deciding what to do first based on effort vs impact (quick wins vs big bets), prioritizing feature roadmaps, triaging bugs or technical debt, allocating resources across initiatives, identifying low-hanging fruit, evaluating strategic options with 2x2 matrix, or when user mentions prioritization, quick wins, effort-impact matrix, high-impact low-effort, big bets, or asks "what should we do first?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning with fixed deadline or target outcome, working backward from future goal to present, defining milestones and dependencies, mapping critical path, identifying what must happen when, planning product launches with hard dates, multi-year strategic roadmaps, event planning, transformation initiatives, or when user mentions "backcast", "work backward from", "reverse planning", "we need to launch by", "target date is", or "what needs to happen to reach".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze web page content, structure, and layout to understand what a page contains and how it is organized. Trigger when the user asks to: analyze a page, understand page structure, inspect a website, summarize page content, examine page layout, review a web page, or describe what is on a page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover data from archived REST APIs using Wayback Machine. Use when: (1) Recovering data from defunct services like Vine, Twitter, or other platforms, (2) Need to find which API endpoints were archived vs which require authentication, (3) Building data recovery pipelines from web.archive.org. Covers CDX API queries to discover archived endpoints, understanding what gets archived (public) vs what doesn't (authenticated), and extracting embedded JSON from archived web pages as a fallback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend relevant Isabelle/HOL or Coq standard library theories, lemmas, and tactics based on proof goals. Use when: (1) Users need library lemmas for their proof, (2) Proof goals match standard library patterns, (3) Users ask what libraries to import, (4) Specific lemmas are needed for list/set/arithmetic operations, (5) Users are stuck and need to know what library support exists, or (6) Guidance on find_theorems/Search commands is needed. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq standard libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly social media performance review for SMBs. Analyses post-level and account-level data from Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, or TikTok. Identifies what worked, what didn't, and why. Produces a client-ready report and specific recommendations that feed back into the content calendar. Accepts CSV exports, screenshots, or manual data input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate engaging, localized App Store release notes (What's New) from git log, bullet points, or free text using canonical metadata under `./Store`. Optionally pairs with promotional text updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The order of operations for an Active Directory penetration test: setup, collection, exploitation, post-processing. Use this whenever you are planning or driving an AD assessment and need to know what to run before what and why (map before you exploit; harvest easy credentials before spraying to avoid lockouts; collect the graph before you reason about paths). Covers phase sequencing with standard tooling: netexec/nxc, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute, BloodHound CE. Invoke it at the start of an engagement, when deciding the next phase, or when a step feels out of order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What-if scenario analysis, scenario tree construction, base bull bear case, sensitivity to macro variables, revenue scenario modeling, cost scenario analysis, margin impact scenarios, interest rate sensitivity, currency impact scenarios, commodity price scenarios

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural thinking partner for an existing repository — scans the codebase, conducts a structured interview, agrees on current architectural state and recommended direction, and produces a shareable insights document. Scoped to one repository, module, or folder. Does not execute transformation — it orients. Use when the user says 'assess my codebase architecture', 'what direction should my codebase go', 'architecture compass', 'understand my architecture', 'audit architecture drift', 'architectural assessment', or 'help me understand what is wrong with my codebase'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for handling ambiguous decisions and missing/conflicting knowledge during code generation, design, and review. Ensures AI surfaces genuine judgment calls with structured options and stops on hallucination risk instead of silently assuming. Use when a decision has multiple valid approaches, when facts are missing or contradictory, when the user asks 'what should we do here?', 'is this a judgment call?', 'should I ask about this?', 'am I guessing here?', 'what are the tradeoffs?', or when deciding between two reasonable architectural or design options. Also composed by molecules to define how judgment calls and clarification requests are surfaced and resolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search real live music, theater, dance, comedy, film, art, sports, festivals, markets, food and drink, nightlife, classes, talks and lectures, books and literary events, tours, outdoors and nature programs, family and kids activities, social and dating nights, networking and business events, wellness classes, religion and spirituality services, civic meetings, charity and volunteering in New York City — with dates, times, prices, booking links and images. Use this whenever someone asks what to do, where to go, what is on, or where to take people in New York, for any date or none, even if they do not name SyncSo. Live catalogue, updated continuously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a risk matrix or heatmap that quantifies what could break by business impact × probability, runs failure mode analysis on the top items, and maps test coverage to risk zones. Includes stakeholder interview frameworks and continuous reassessment. Run this BEFORE test-strategy or test-planning. Use when: "risk assessment," "risk matrix," "risk heatmap," "what could break," "critical paths," "failure modes," "where to focus testing." Not for: multi-quarter QA direction — use test-strategy. Not for: a single sprint/release test plan — use test-planning. Not for: hands-on session-based bug hunting — use exploratory-testing. Related: test-strategy, test-planning, release-readiness, qa-metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routing skill of last resort. Takes a plain-language QA situation and names the right 1-2 skills to use and in what order. Use ONLY when the request does not match any other skill's trigger phrases. Use when: "which skill should I use," "where do I start," "I'm not sure what to test," "/qa-do," or any vague QA situation that doesn't map to one skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project with no QA — use qa-start. Not for: capturing project setup/context — use qa-project-context. If the request clearly matches another skill, invoke that skill directly instead of routing through here. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[1-2 sentence description of what this skill does]. Triggers on [specific phrases/contexts that should activate this skill]. Outputs [what the skill produces].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform validated pain points into articulated user value statements for PRD v0.1 Spark. Triggers on completing problem framing, defining user outcomes, articulating value propositions, or requests like "what value do users get", "define outcomes", "articulate the benefit", "finish v0.1", "pain to value", "what do they gain". Outputs CFD- entries tagged as value hypotheses with evidence tiers. Follows Problem Framing skill in workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX frontend stack -- decision tree and orchestrator for choosing between Stimulus, Turbo, TwigComponent, LiveComponent, UX Icons, and UX Map. Use when the user is unsure which tool fits, wants to combine multiple UX packages, or asks a general frontend architecture question in Symfony. Also trigger when the user asks "which UX package should I use", "how to make this interactive", "should I use Stimulus or LiveComponent", "how to structure my Symfony frontend", "what is the difference between Turbo and LiveComponent", "should this be a Frame or a LiveComponent", "how do these UX packages work together", "what is the Symfony way to do frontend". Do NOT trigger when the user clearly names a specific tool (stimulus, turbo, twig-component, live-component, ux-icons, ux-map) -- defer to the specialized skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

知らない分野にキャッチアップするとき、汎用的な言葉から界隈の用語・中心の人・場（学会・雑誌・個人ブログ・動画・リポジトリ・一覧）を特定し、 引用・リンク・著者を芋づる式にたどって、当たりの原文（論文も個人の記事や動画の字幕も）を要約せずそのまま ~/research/<話題>/sources/ に落とす。 周ごとに地図（map.md）を育て、要る主張の全部に原文が付くか飽和したら止める。 見張りのモードでは、地図の場（Qiita・Zenn のタグ、note、YouTube、ブログ、arXiv）の新着を RSS で引いて原文の冒頭つきで並べる。 以下で使用:「芋づる式に調べて」「この分野をキャッチアップしたい」「界隈の用語と人から掘って」 「論文とか先行研究を漁って」「既存の技術を真似したいから元ネタを探して」「上手い人のやり方を集めて」「原文で落として」「/imozuru」 「〇〇って研究あるの？原典ほしい」「全然わからないから流れを掘って」「どういう界隈でどう呼ばれてるか知りたい」 「〇〇の新着見て」「今週の〇〇の記事まとめて」「キャッチアップ」「/imozuru watch」 "dig into this field", "find the canonical papers on X", "literature dive", "what's new in X this week"。 以下には使用しない: 答えが1つの事実の確認（年・有無だけ・仕様1つ → そのまま検索）／ 手元の PC の中の資料を探す／読んだ資料の要約や解説を書く。