「design」の検索結果

把用户对 HarmonyOS、ArkUI、Canvas 或代码生成产品动效的模糊描述转换为准确术语、相近概念和可能的 ArkUI 能力，例如“松手像急刹车”“拖过头有阻力”“页面像从同一个卡片长出来”“后端没完成却显示成功”。用于命名、检索和编写提示词；不要用于完整设计审视、传统视频剪辑、镜头叙事、直接实现或构建问题。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a deterministic 15-second vertical promo video from real Simulator screenshots with a three-beat viewer challenge and no Remotion initialization. Use in a twelve-minute parallel launch lane, as a reliable fallback to a richer Claude Design animation, or whenever ffmpeg and ImageMagick are available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pressure-test and freeze a tiny iOS MVP in seven minutes using one persona, one explicit devil's-advocate round, scope cuts, and a three-screen flow. Use when an audience supplies an app idea, when requirements must be settled live, or when a concept needs a fast implementation-risk check before Claude Design or Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a 50-minute live iOS launch sprint across the lightweight requirements, Claude Design handoff, SwiftUI implementation, landing page, ASO, Simulator screenshot, promo-video, and privacy-scan skills bundled in this plugin. Use as the main entry point when the whole talk workflow should be planned or executed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a polished local launch page in twelve minutes from a frozen app brief and design handoff, including a playable micro-demo, responsive copy, privacy proof, and zero remote dependencies. Use for the parallel marketing lane of a live iOS build, a fallback landing page, or a fast product teaser that must run offline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to design, run, or audit product or GTM analytics — metric hierarchies and north stars, funnels, cohort retention, churn, pipeline velocity, forecasting, lead scoring, NRR, A/B tests, or analytical SQL — or uploads a dataset to analyze. Triggers on questions like "why did activation drop", "is this metric meaningful", "review my dashboard", or "what should I measure". For writing the spec that defines a feature's success metrics, use product-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, auditing, or speccing a video's motion and visual craft: shot lists, storyboards, color scripts, transitions, easing, kinetic typography, pacing, retention, or animation principles. Triggers: 'video plan', 'shot list', 'storyboard', 'color script', 'motion spec', 'fix the pacing', 'explainer/demo/brand video'. For the spoken words themselves, use script-writer-skill; for in-code UI motion, use frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to find, prioritize, or engage B2B prospects — defining an ICP, tiering accounts, building or enriching lists, reading buying signals, designing multi-channel cadences, cold calling, LinkedIn outreach, routing inbound leads, or diagnosing weak pipeline generation. Also for live prospecting coaching. Not for closing (use sales-skill), copy (use copywriter-skill), or CAC analysis (use channel-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to scope, write, or audit a product spec — a PRD, feature spec, user stories, acceptance criteria, or a "spec this out"/"break this into stories"/"definition of done" request — or wants an existing spec reviewed for gaps and anti-patterns. Triggers whenever a feature idea needs to become structured requirements that align a team on what to build. For the analytics behind success metrics, use data-analysis; for the technical design, use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide the technical path once the ask is clear. Use when the WHAT is confirmed but more than one way to build it remains — architecture, technology, design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing bytecode dispatch loops, choosing stack or register VM shapes, adding inline caches, or building a first JIT with mmap. Not for a language toolchain: use compiler-frontend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to explain or teach a subsystem, module, pattern, or change in progressive layers from purpose to code depth. Not for design rationale: use why. Not for source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to restore service from a known failure with a prescribed recovery operation. Not for design-time failure definition or open-ended debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning an end-to-end fuzzing program for a project: engine and target selection, corpus management, and CI or nightly wiring. Not for harness design: use fuzz-harness-writing. Not for engine operation or triage: use libfuzzer. Not for sanitizer flag reference: use sanitizers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to build, run, or triage a coverage-guided C/C++ fuzz campaign on the libFuzzer or AFL++ engine. Not for harness design: use fuzz-harness-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user builds or styles a web frontend or asks to make it not look AI-generated. Not for component-level UI work without the token system: use frontend-ui-engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to prototype one design question through a cheap logic or UI experiment, including button-driven state-model checks. Not for polished artifacts: use polished-web-prototype.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding what an interface should do before UI is built or audited: consequences, action scope, reachable states, naming, and accessibility. Not for visual implementation: use prototype.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a protocol, concurrent algorithm, or design needs a model-checked TLA+ or Alloy spec, or a TLC or Apalache trace needs reading. Not for choosing when to model: use validation-first-driven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to design, write, review, refactor, lint, or performance-diagnose Lean 4 proofs, libraries, or tactics. Not for non-Lean code or changes outside source, API, proof, or linter scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when directing, building, or auditing React/Next.js Tailwind UI: visual direction, responsive/dark-mode retrofits, UX audits. Not for typography or motion: use typography-audit or ui-animation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when invoked to apply an invariant-first, fail-fast, special-case-eliminating baseline. Not for domain models in types: use type-driven. Not for design-by-contract: use contract-driven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to build or review a CLI intended for coding agents and return flag-driven, pipeline-safe, idempotent design advice. Not for running or profiling a CLI: use control-cli.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain an existing Proto UI Prototype or implement a governed Base or design-language component slice. Use for governed component behavior, anatomy, inheritance, exports, CLI registration, style projection, demos, or public preview work. Do not use to admit a new semantic subject or invent Base ownership from a component name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。