「auth」の検索結果

Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align content production with broader brand and SEO goals. Triggers on content strategy, content plan, editorial strategy, content pillars, content calendar, editorial calendar, topical authority, topic clusters, content governance, content roadmap, content production. Also triggers when the user is about to start producing content without a strategic plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Australian Information Security Manual (ISM) advisor for government entities and their supply chains. Use for ISM control selection, gap analysis, system authorisation, IRAP assessment preparation, security documentation, and ASD compliance. Triggers on: ISM controls, ASD compliance, IRAP assessment, PROTECTED system scoping, Essential Eight vs ISM, system authorisation, NC/OS/ PROTECTED/SECRET/TOP SECRET classification markings, security objectives, ISM guidelines or chapters, control applicability markings, cybersecurity documentation for Australian government, the June 2026 ISM update, ISM AI application controls (ISM-2112/2113/2114), and any question about the ASD Information Security Manual framework or Australian government cybersecurity obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements authentication/authorization, secures user input, and prevents OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with bcrypt/argon2, parameterized queries, CORS/CSP, and JWT tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize CLAUDE.md", "create a new skill", "write a custom agent", "configure hooks", "manage context window", "set up MCP servers", "scaffold a skill package", "analyze token budget", "create subagents", "configure permissions", "set up worktrees", or "integrate Claude Code with editors". Covers Claude Code CLI mastery, skill authoring, context engineering, hooks automation, subagent creation, and development workflow optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signup and registration flow optimization covering SSO strategy, progressive profiling, field reduction, multi-step flow design, authentication UX, post-submit experience, and mobile registration patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Terraform provider configuration and authentication with the Plugin Framework: provider schema for credentials (Optional + Sensitive attributes), environment variable fallbacks, credential provider chains (static config, then environment variables, shared credentials file, and platform identity), unknown-value guards in Configure(), secret redaction, configure-time credential validation, and diagnostics that name every source tried. Use when implementing or reviewing a provider's Configure method or provider schema, adding authentication options (API keys, tokens, profiles, credentials files, assume-role), deciding how a provider should resolve credentials, debugging "no valid credential sources" or missing-credentials errors, or unit testing credential resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan digital PR: media lists, thought leadership, E-E-A-T authority. One pitch → pr-pitch. "how do we build E-E-A-T authority"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring a Relayflows flow (@relayflows/surface / @relayflows/sdk, the journal-based v2 engine — the CLI is `flows`, package versions 2.0.x) in TypeScript or YAML/JSON. Covers the three-rung ladder (run/llm/agent), the resident verbs (human/dispatch/done), verification gates, TypeScript vs YAML authoring, per-step cli/model selection and its resolution order, flows.json, and `flows check`/`run`/`resume` with their real refusal shapes and exit codes. Not for the older, unrelated `@relayflows/core` WorkflowBuilder engine (`.pattern('dag')`/.agent()/.step() chains) that `writing-agent-relay-workflows` and `migrating-persona-to-relayflow` cover — that's a different product despite the similar name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess, report, and manage serious incidents involving high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act. Covers incident qualification, deadline buckets (2/10/15 days), authority notification, deployer duties (Art. 26(5)), cross-regulation mapping (GDPR/NIS2/MDR), corrective measures, and DACH-specific routing. Use when asked to evaluate whether an AI incident is reportable, draft an Article 73 notification, identify the right authority, or build an AI incident response process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingual, or open-data layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates consequence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Australian Information Security Manual (ISM) advisor for government entities and their supply chains. Use for ISM control selection, gap analysis, system authorisation, IRAP assessment preparation, security documentation, and ASD compliance. Triggers on: ISM controls, ASD compliance, IRAP assessment, PROTECTED system scoping, Essential Eight vs ISM, system authorisation, NC/OS/ PROTECTED/SECRET/TOP SECRET classification markings, security objectives, ISM guidelines or chapters, control applicability markings, cybersecurity documentation for Australian government, and any question about the ASD Information Security Manual framework or Australian government cybersecurity obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a security incident, data breach, or actively exploited vulnerability raises the question "who must we notify, where, and by when?" Screens one incident across the EU reporting regimes — NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act — determines which duties fire for each involved entity's roles, resolves the receiving authority per regime and member state from served national law, and produces a deadline table in which every duty, authority, and deadline is cited from official publisher text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector. Never answers from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank — a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build students' capacity to interrogate a historical source before reading — asking who authored it, when, why, and what this means for reliability. Use when students read documents without attending to authorship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors or reviews Know/Understand/Do charts for competency-based learning targets across developmental bands. Handles seven input types from raw curriculum documents to existing LT sets. Routes to upstream skills when stronger inputs are available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert multiplayer for desync, rollback, dedicated --headless servers, interest culling, and bandwidth spikes: ENet/WebRTC choice, authority, secure RPCs, client prediction/reconcile, and adaptive sync. Trigger on rubber-banding, cheat-able clients, peer floods, late join, or profiler Network spikes — not only greenfield online games. Keywords: multiplayer, RPC, ENetMultiplayerPeer, MultiplayerSynchronizer, authority, client prediction, rollback, interest management, headless, desync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for adding multiplayer to single-player games including client-server architecture, authoritative server design, MultiplayerSynchronizer, lag compensation (client prediction, server reconciliation), input buffering, and anti-cheat measures. Use when retrofitting multiplayer, porting to online play, or designing networked gameplay. Trigger keywords: MultiplayerPeer, ENetMultiplayerPeer, SceneMultiplayer, MultiplayerSynchronizer, rpc, rpc_id, multiplayer_authority, client_prediction, server_reconciliation, lag_compensation, rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert multiplayer for desync, rollback, dedicated --headless servers, interest culling, and bandwidth spikes: ENet/WebRTC choice, authority, secure RPCs, client prediction/reconcile, and adaptive sync. Trigger on rubber-banding, cheat-able clients, peer floods, late join, or profiler Network spikes — not only greenfield online games. Keywords: multiplayer, RPC, ENetMultiplayerPeer, MultiplayerSynchronizer, authority, client prediction, rollback, interest management, headless, desync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for adding multiplayer to single-player games including client-server architecture, authoritative server design, MultiplayerSynchronizer, lag compensation (client prediction, server reconciliation), input buffering, and anti-cheat measures. Use when retrofitting multiplayer, porting to online play, or designing networked gameplay. Trigger keywords: MultiplayerPeer, ENetMultiplayerPeer, SceneMultiplayer, MultiplayerSynchronizer, rpc, rpc_id, multiplayer_authority, client_prediction, server_reconciliation, lag_compensation, rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。