「check」の検索結果

Build AI compliance checking systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-compliance-checker related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI accessibility checking. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-accessibility-checker related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create ADA compliance checklists for construction. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ada-compliance-checklist related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create accessibility checklists for web applications. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with accessibility-checklist related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the UI and style files changed in the working tree against this repo's own design system, before they are saved or committed. Runs the same deterministic check as the CLI's --check flag (no tokens, about a second): hardcoded colours where a token exists, near-identical colour twins, off-scale spacing, radii, font sizes and shadows, typefaces outside the system, arbitrary Tailwind values, static inline styles, !important, duplicate component definitions and imports of the copy to avoid, new tokens that copy an existing one, chart colours written by hand where the repo keeps a chart palette (and one calm warning asking for a palette where it keeps none), on a repo built on MUI, Mantine, Chakra or Ant Design, colours or pixel sizes written onto kit components where the theme has a value, and on a Tailwind theme or a shadcn repo, palette classes such as text-gray-500 where the theme names a colour of that kind. Findings name the file, the line and the fix. This is the small, fast check for what just changed; the roast skill is the full scan of the whole repo with a report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent tasks on a Volcengine (火山引擎) cloud phone via the Mobile Use Agent OpenAPI. Use when the user asks to drive, automate, operate, or test an Android app on a cloud phone for enterprise use cases (e.g. reply to WeCom customer messages, add leads in a CRM, clock in on DingTalk, check invoicing stats, query inventory in a supply-chain app, ship e-commerce orders, approve OA requests) or personal ones (open 小红书 and search, place an order, check nearby places on a map), or to check status, fetch result, cancel, or list a Mobile Use run. Requires one-time setup to store Volcengine AK/SK locally; ProductId and PodId can be saved as a default device during setup, the user prompt is provided per run. Supports optional GPS injection (GpsInfo) with user consent (auto-asked only for location-related tasks).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to update their project's CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, verify their Claude Code setup, or check for improvements to their project configuration. Triggers on requests like: "update my project docs", "verify my claude setup", "check my project configuration", "audit my .claude directory", "improve my CLAUDE.md", "is my setup correct", "/update-project", "/verify-project", or "/check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Shopify applications, extensions, and themes using GraphQL/REST APIs, Shopify CLI, Polaris UI components, and Liquid templating. Capabilities include app development with OAuth authentication, checkout UI extensions for customizing checkout flow, admin UI extensions for dashboard integration, POS extensions for retail, theme development with Liquid, webhook management, billing API integration, product/order/customer management. Use when building Shopify apps, implementing checkout customizations, creating admin interfaces, developing themes, integrating payment processing, managing store data via APIs, or extending Shopify functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-release checklist for Forge — runs verify, checks version bump, changelog, docs, and docker build. Use before tagging v*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when hunting Pwn Request vulnerabilities where pull_request_target workflows checkout attacker-controlled PR code and execute it in a privileged context with access to repository secrets. Trigger on: "pwn request", "pull_request_target", "checkout PR head", "npm install in CI", "lifecycle scripts in CI", "preinstall script", "postinstall script", "package.json scripts CI", "npm ci ignore-scripts false", "actions/checkout ref pull request head sha", privileged workflow running PR code, "Gato-X", supply chain via PR lifecycle scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Checks every URL in the evidence data lake for HTTP liveness — catches dead links (404, 403, timeout, connection errors) before evidence is ingested into the registry. Use this skill when running the full /ev-pipeline, asked to "validate links", "check evidence URLs", "run link validation", "find dead links in the data lake", "check HTTP status of evidence sources", or "verify evidence links still work". Wraps validate_sources.py as a temporary coexistence URL-health shim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-fix-at-a-time, approval-gated design fix recovery. Given a checklist of fixes (handover doc, CHECKLIST.md, or inline list), applies each individually, presents a diff, and waits for an explicit APPROVE / REJECT / NO CHANGES decision before committing. Trigger phrases: /design-iteration, "go through the checklist one by one", "fix these one at a time", "bucket recovery", "design fix pass".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether the work is actually finished rather than finished-looking — what was promised versus what really runs. Several models compare the task against the code, and every completion claim has to survive a command that was actually executed. Use before calling something done, before a PR, at the end of a session, or on "is this done", "did I finish", "check if done", "what did we skip".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run code quality checks (ruff, mypy, pytest) and optionally simplify code. This skill should be used when the user wants to check code quality, run linters, run tests, or simplify recently modified code. Triggered by /lint, /check, or /code-quality commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and bypasses anti-debugging and anti-analysis checks in malware: PEB flags, debugger-detection APIs, timing checks, and exception tricks, then neutralizes them to continue analysis. Activates for requests to identify anti-debugging, bypass anti-debug checks, or analyze evasion that blocks a debugger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bypasses anti-VM and sandbox checks during analysis by locating the specific detection routines (artifact strings, timing, CPUID/hypervisor bit) and planning patches or environment hardening so the sample detonates. Activates for requests to bypass anti-VM checks, defeat sandbox detection, or make an evasive sample run for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-commit code quality review for Unity C# code. Checks against Rules, CODING_STANDARDS.md, NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md, and GDD Gherkin test coverage. Use when code has been written and tests are passing but before committing. Runs automatically at Step 8.5 of /uw-cmd-implement-feature. Triggers on "review this code", "check my implementation", "pre-commit review", "code review", "check before commit", "is this ready to commit", "review my changes", or any request to validate code quality before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。