1,810 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Phase E of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: verify behavioral parity against Phase A contracts, record intentional differences, validate supported environments and packaging, and make evidence-based legacy cutover decisions. Use only for an explicit migration when comparing the legacy and Avalonia implementations or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not delete legacy without the cutover checklist and explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Encode Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great. From the creator of Sonner (13M+ weekly npm downloads), Vaul, animations.dev, and Linear's web team. Use when user wants to polish UI, audit animations, review component interactions, add micro-feedback, or elevate motion quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent memory across AI sessions using ChromaDB vector database. Stores and retrieves context from past conversations, decisions, and code. Use when user asks to remember something, search past conversations, recall what was done before, save context for later, or find information from previous sessions. Do NOT use for git history or file-based notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous engineering orchestrator ported from Lauren Tan's pstack (poteto-mode): reads your task, picks one of 23 playbooks (bug fix, feature, refactoring, perf, investigation, prototype, babysit, shipping, autonomous run, orchestrate, and more), routes to bundled procedures (how, why, architect, arena, swarm, interrogate, unslop, technical-writing, show-me-your-work, tdd, and others), and applies 24 engineering principles. Self-contained: no plugin install, no sibling skills required, works with any agent that reads skills.sh-format SKILL.md files. Use whenever a task needs rigor: nontrivial code changes, architecture decisions, debugging, reviews, PRs, long autonomous runs, or "work like poteto", "poteto-mode", "pstack".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing model,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'pricing strategy,' 'pricing experiments,' 'price anchoring,' 'enterprise pricing,' 'GTM pricing,' 'price setting,' 'value-based pricing,' 'revenue optimization,' or 'pricing psychology.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, packaging strategy, discount frameworks, upsell mechanics, and pricing experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spawns the decision-scorer agent after architect proposes 2+ variants in an ADR. Produces a weighted scoring table and recommended choice saved to docs/decisions/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate technical decisions into human language. Explain in cost, speed, stability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounds version-sensitive engineering decisions in authoritative current sources by detecting the installed stack, retrieving official documentation or source, reconciling conflicts, and recording citations and confidence. Use for framework APIs, dependency behavior, standards, compatibility, migrations, or technical recommendations that may have changed. Not for stable project-local logic or broad product discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides user research and research ops. Use when running interviews, usability tests, surveys, or synthesis to de-risk product decisions; not experiments or review mining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-model agent orchestration using specialized agents for planning, coding, research, math/science, visual analysis, and adversarial review. Use when tasks are complex enough to benefit from different models' strengths, when you want adversarial review to catch blind spots, or when coordinating multi-step workflows across agent roles. Triggers on complex projects, multi-step tasks, architecture decisions, or when explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run this skill at the very start of any new conversation or agent session before writing a single line of code. It loads the project's architectural decisions, conventions, known gotchas, and current task status so the agent operates with full context — not as a blank slate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Channeling the documented thinking of named notable figures (an 'itako' medium) — their mental models, heuristics, and decision-style as advisory lenses. Not for decisions (Magi) or personas (Cast).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brainstorming interactively to deepen ideas via four modes (Expand/Propose/Evaluate/Subtract). Does not write code. Not for decisions (Magi), feature specs (Spark), or one-shot reframing (Flux).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring standalone and cross-team specifications: PRD/SRS/HLD/LLD, staged L0-L4 unified packages, BDD acceptance criteria, and traceability. Use for technical or multi-audience documentation; not implementation or architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliberating decisions and founder priorities through multi-perspective, named-expert, and YC-style advisory lenses. Use for verdicts, office hours, or expert critique; not implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interpret learning analytics data and translate dashboard findings into actionable teaching decisions. Use when reviewing LMS data, quiz patterns, or engagement metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see emails. For pricing decisions, see pricing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' or 'should I offer a free plan.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge or how to structure their plans. For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。