「engineering」の検索結果

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has evaluation principles or a dataset but needs help choosing the right graders, designing evaluation metrics, creating LLM-as-judge prompts, combining multiple metrics into a composite score, or building an automated evaluation pipeline. Also use when the user mentions grader selection, metric design, judge prompt engineering, rubric design, evaluation pipeline code, or "how to evaluate [X] automatically." Outputs executable OpenJudge pipeline code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze digital and analog captures from Saleae Logic MSO devices. Decode protocols like UART, SPI, I2C from exported binary files. Use when analyzing logic analyzer captures for CTF challenges, hardware reverse engineering, or protocol decoding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android APK unpacking and resource extraction tool for reverse engineering. Use when you need to decode APK files, extract resources, examine AndroidManifest.xml, analyze smali code, or repackage modified APKs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a learning sequence teaching prompt quality — comparing vague vs. refined prompts to show why specificity and context transform AI output. Use when students use AI without understanding why output quality varies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting Claude Code projects, writing CLAUDE.md/spec.md, dispatching subagents, or requesting Agent Teams parallel development. Covers Spec-Driven Development, Context Engineering, and post-dev workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create runbooks, playbooks, and technical documentation for engineering teams. Use when the user wants to document a process, create a runbook, build operational docs, or formalize any repeatable technical procedure. Triggers on requests like "create a runbook for...", "document this process", "write a playbook", or any technical documentation request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a repeatable AI prompt or workflow into a structured, shareable skill for the affiliate-skills GitHub repository. Use this skill when the user wants to create a new skill, write a SKILL.md, convert a prompt to a skill, share a skill via the GitHub repo, or document an AI workflow. Also trigger for: "create a skill", "write a skill", "make this a skill", "turn this into a skill", "publish skill", "add skill to list", "write SKILL.md", "skill from prompt", "document this workflow", "package this as a skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and investigate bulk registration abuse on SaaS platforms. Given access to a user database (or exported CSV/JSON), run a multi-dimensional anomaly analysis — email domain clustering, registration tempo, UA fingerprinting, session structure, usage patterns, and credit consumption — to produce a scored abuse report with actionable recommendations. Use when investigating suspicious sign-up spikes, credit fraud, free-tier abuse, or account farming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a diff or file through the Chisle lens: flag over-engineering, speculative abstractions, reinvented stdlib, and verbose code that a lazier approach would shrink. One finding per line, no praise. Use when the user says "chisle review", "review this for bloat", or invokes /chisle-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-shot efficiency audit of a file, diff, or whole repo across BOTH axes at once: over-engineered code (reinvented stdlib, needless abstractions, speculative config) AND bloated prose (verbose comments, padded docstrings, redundant doc sections). Neither a pure code-minimizer nor a pure prose compressor does both in one pass. That's the point. Ranked report, biggest saving first; changes nothing. Use when the user says "chisle audit", "/chisle-audit", "audit this for bloat", "what can I cut", "review this PR for over-engineering and verbosity".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluation criteria and scoring for data engineering artifact reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a launch needs a repeatable EXECUTION playbook — a T-30 to D+7 timeline, per-function checklists for content, design, ads, sales, and engineering, a launch-day war room, an escalation matrix, and roll-back criteria. Trigger on 'launch playbook', 'launch checklist', 'launch day plan', 'launch SOP', 'war room', 'we launch in two weeks and nothing is organized'. Also use when a GTM strategy exists and nobody knows who does what on the day. Not for — the strategy and beachhead choice, see `59-go-to-market-global`; the campaign brief, see `02-campaign-brief-global`; the post-launch review, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; a live crisis, see `66-crisis-playbook-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized reverse engineering of custom binary protocols, Protobuf/gRPC, WebSocket frames, and PCAP-driven protocol recovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates task-oriented technical documentation with progressive disclosure. Use when writing READMEs, API docs, architecture docs, or markdown documentation. Also use this skill at the END of any completed reverse engineering, penetration testing, CTF, or security analysis task to generate a formal report in the user's project directory. Trigger keywords: 写报告, 写文档, 出报告, writeup, 技术文档, report, documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized Android or iOS application reverse engineering and security testing, including APK or IPA analysis, runtime instrumentation, SSL pinning, and platform protection checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for blue-team threat hunting, detection engineering with Sigma/YARA, SIEM query design, and incident detection validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for free/open reverse engineering with Ghidra (headless or GUI), including decompile, cross-refs, and optional Ghidra MCP workflows when IDA is unavailable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for reverse engineering stripped Go and Rust binaries including runtime recognition, pclntab/moduel data recovery, panic strings, and idiomatic decompilation recovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

.NET / C# 二进制逆向。当目标是 .NET assembly（PE 头含 CLR、.exe/.dll 托管程序）、C# 编译产物（含 NativeAOT）、红队 Sharp* 工具（Rubeus / SharpHound / SharpHound 等）、.NET 混淆程序（ConfuserEx / SmartAssembly / Babel / Eazfuscator）、.NET loader / info-stealer / 套壳 malware 时使用。优先用 dnSpyEx + de4dot，需要 AI 直接操作时联动 dnSpy MCP。不用于纯 native 二进制（走 reverse-engineering / ida-reverse）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze binaries with radare2/r2 from the command line, including reverse engineering, disassembly, function analysis, strings/import inspection, patching, binary diffing, hex inspection, or r2 scripting. Also use it when the user mentions PE/ELF/Mach-O/DEX/WASM files together with CLI analysis, `rabin2`, `rasm2`, `radiff2`, `r2pipe`, or asks for radare2 command help on Windows/Linux/macOS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。