「fixes」の検索結果

Analyze a Coval adversarial / red-team testing report and turn it into an agent-hardening plan. Use when a user provides a Coval report URL, report export, run IDs, screenshots, or a per-scenario scorecard from an adversarial sweep and wants evidence-backed next steps such as prompt/guardrail changes, refusal hardening, verification fixes, escalation routing, or expanded attack coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a Coval audio-quality testing report from runs across different voice, speaking-style, volume, interruption, and background-noise scenarios. Use when a user provides a Coval report URL, report export, run IDs, screenshots, or metric summary and wants evidence-backed next steps such as prompt changes, tool handling fixes, STT/TTS adjustments, trace setup, or expanded audio-scenario coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scheduled patrol that finds real persistence and error bugs and fixes them. Use when running the system-error repair patrol automation, or when stuck rows, SLA breaches, the system_errors queue, or app_log ERROR rows need a repair rather than a report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pattern Patrols system of recurring, certified sweeps. Use when you are a patrol run or an assignment names a P# id, you spot a registered-pattern violation off-mission (log a sighting), a mistake class keeps recurring, or you touch PATROL_REGISTRY or PATROL_SIGHTINGS. NOT for one-off bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-task routine: health checks, fixes, then commit and push. Use when finishing a unit of work, or when the user says 'commit and push', 'ship it', 'get it ready', 'wrap up', or just 'do this' with no push instruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes UI performance across loading speed, rendering, animations, images, and bundle size. Use when the user mentions slow, laggy, janky, performance, bundle size, load time, or wants a faster, smoother experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility audit for CSS covering focus styles, color contrast, text sizing, screen reader support, and WCAG compliance. Provides actionable fixes. Use when auditing accessibility or fixing a11y issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. 4-phase root cause investigation — NO fixes without understanding the problem first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous rule adherence checker. Scans the codebase for rule violations, fixes the highest-impact ones in an isolated worktree, runs full validation, creates a PR. Uses memory to track progress across runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates user-facing changelogs and release notes from git commit history. Parses conventional commits, categorizes changes into features, fixes, breaking changes, and more, then rewrites technical messages into customer-friendly language. Use when the user asks to generate a changelog, write release notes, summarize recent commits, prepare CHANGELOG.md, or document what changed between versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a two-pass, multidisciplinary code audit led by a tie-breaker lead, combining security, performance, UX, DX, and edge-case analysis into one prioritized report with concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to audit code, perform a deep review, stress-test a codebase, or produce a risk-ranked remediation plan across backend, frontend, APIs, infra scripts, and product flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit context files (CLAUDE.md, .claude/ tree, READMEs, docs) for broken references and verifiably stale content. Runs a deterministic offline link/path checker first, then a bounded semantic review where every finding must cite evidence. Reports findings; fixes only on request. Use when the user says "docs check", "/docs-checker", "check the docs for stale content", "audit CLAUDE.md", or when a scheduled cloud routine fires.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GraalVM Native Image expert that adds native image support to Java applications, builds the project, analyzes build errors, applies fixes, and iterates until successful compilation using Oracle best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or improve UI test coverage for visual regression, interactions, and accessibility. Use when the user asks for a test strategy, automated tests, testing setup, or fixes to flaky UI tests. A one-time browser inspection or visual review does not require a new test suite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a GitHub issue resolution expert specializing in systematic bug investigation, feature implementation, and collaborative development workflows. Your expertise spans issue triage, root cause analysis, test-driven development, and pull request management. You excel at transforming vague bug reports into actionable fixes and feature requests into production-ready code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies SOLID and DRY principles. C# anti-patterns, fixes, SRP compliance checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide for upgrading xUnit 2.9.x to 3.x. Use when upgrading xUnit v2 to v3 or understanding xUnit v3 new features and breaking changes. Covers package updates, async void fixes, IAsyncLifetime adjustments. Includes new features: Assert.Skip, Explicit Tests, Matrix Theory, Assembly Fixtures. Keywords: xunit upgrade, xunit v3, xunit 3.x, xunit migration, xunit upgrade, xunit.v3, OutputType Exe, IAsyncLifetime v3, Assert.Skip, SkipUnless, SkipWhen, Explicit attribute, MatrixTheoryData, AssemblyFixture, breaking changes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。