1,225 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on record, collection, value, responsibility, delegation, or algorithm boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on behavior/data ownership, statement placement, loops, or dead-code knowledge, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design clean, graphics-first technical presentations and posters with logical slide progression, visual hierarchy, purposeful motion, and complementary speaker notes. Use for research talks, conference slides, seminars, defenses, posters, or figure-focused presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate OpenClaw release candidates through OCM using the built OpenClaw artifact, a broad reusable scenario matrix, copied existing-user state, clean new-user state, concise pass/fail reporting, and focused failure notes. Use when asked to test OpenClaw origin/main, release readiness, upgrade behavior, plugins, services, channels, doctor recovery, packaging, or broad release risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a camera-equipment repairer — diagnosing sensor dust vs. lens contamination, deciding whether a shutter is nearing end-of-life and should be replaced vs. repaired, calibrating autofocus and lens collimation, isolating image-stabilization mechanism faults, or sourcing parts for a discontinued body/lens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ENCODE functional genomics data for disease mechanism research. Use when the user wants to connect GWAS variants to regulatory elements, annotate disease-associated loci with functional data, identify therapeutic targets from epigenomic data, build disease regulatory models, cross-reference with clinical trials and drug databases, or conduct any disease-focused, pathology-driven, or clinical variant interpretation workflow. Covers the full pipeline from disease-tissue mapping through GWAS variant annotation, heritability enrichment, cancer epigenomics, drug target identification, and clinical trial cross-referencing. Integrates ENCODE with Open Targets, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts natural-language descriptions or UI spec files into optimized Google Stitch prompts. Use when creating, refining, or validating design directives for Google Stitch. Use when user says "create a Stitch prompt", "optimize this for Stitch", "convert this spec to a Stitch prompt", "write a UI prompt", or mentions Google Stitch prompt authoring. Follows Stitch best practices with short, directive prompts focused on screens, structure, and visual hierarchy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-grounded workflow for designing, reviewing, and improving video game user interfaces, including HUDs, menus, navigation, focus states, onboarding/tutorials, objective tracking, input prompts, readability, accessibility, and destructive-action flows. Use when asked how to make good game UI, critique a game UI or HUD, propose UI/UX guidelines, design menu or gameplay interfaces, compare HUD vs diegetic/spatial presentation, create a UI design brief, or run a usability/accessibility review for PC, console, mobile, or VR games.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit of a codebase — web apps, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, daemons, and more. Use when asked to find security bugs, do a security review, audit for vulnerabilities, or pen-test the code. Focuses on exploitable issues with real impact, not theoretical concerns or industry-standard behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update GitHub Actions versions in workflow files, focusing only on major version changes. Use when the user wants to update action versions, check for outdated GitHub Actions, or upgrade workflow dependencies to their latest major versions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scout Rule — identify the top 3 highest-impact improvement opportunities in files you're already touching. Analyzes entire file content, not just changed lines. Focuses on pre-existing code quality, not PR bugs. Use when preparing a PR, during code review, or after completing a feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and protect deep work: scheduling focus blocks, task selection, shutdown rituals, and measuring depth. Use when important work never gets sustained attention or days fill with shallow tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a morning briefing ritual with Muse: overnight priorities, today's calendar, weather-aware planning, and top 3 focus items as a concise chat summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protect your time with Muse as calendar guardian: time-blocking, buffer time, declining gracefully, weekly calendar audits, and defending focus and personal time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit designs for accessibility with WCAG checklists covering color, type, focus, motion, and content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a focused tech debt reduction sprint — inventories all technical debt (TODOs, outdated deps, missing tests, god objects), fixes code smells, removes dead code, then hardens with a review pass. Use when a codebase feels sluggish, before a major feature push, or on a regular maintenance cadence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a government or public services system for compliance, fraud risk, and security — chains benefits processing review, fraud detection analysis, regulatory compliance check (ADA, Section 508, FISMA, Privacy Act), and PII-focused security audit. Use for benefits platforms, eligibility engines, enrollment portals, or inter-agency data systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a codebase for product-market fit readiness -- evaluate startup PMF signals, core value loop tightness, feature scatter vs focus ratio, user activation funnel friction, retention hook infrastructure, pricing flexibility, analytics event coverage, CI/CD iteration speed, and growth-stage maturity for pre-seed through Series A products.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Allocate testing effort based on risk and failure likelihood using Google's SET/SWE/TE model. Use when user says "risk-based testing", "where should I focus testing", "test coverage strategy", "prioritize what to test", "high risk areas", or needs to decide how to distribute QA effort across a codebase - even if they don't explicitly say "risk-based".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a roadmap or backlog to distinguish outcomes from outputs. Use when the user says "outcome vs output", "escaping the build trap", "are we building the right things", "roadmap review", "feature factory", "output-driven team", "we keep shipping but nothing changes", or wants to shift focus from shipping features to delivering value - even if they don't explicitly say "outcome vs output".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a structured Quarterly Business Review deck for a customer account. Use when user says "QBR", "quarterly business review", "prep my QBR", "build the deck", "renewal prep", "executive check-in", "90-day review", or "customer business review" - even if they don't use the acronym. Applies to CSMs preparing for executive-level customer meetings focused on value delivered, health, and next quarter alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。