「framework」の検索結果

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a threat model for a target codebase. Three modes: "interview" walks an application owner through the four-question framework and produces a threat model from their answers; "bootstrap" derives a threat model from the code plus past vulnerabilities (CVEs, git history, pentest reports) when no owner is available; "bootstrap-then-interview" chains the two when both owner and codebase are present. All write THREAT_MODEL.md in a shared schema. Use when asked to "threat model", "build a threat model", "map the attack surface", or "what should we be worried about in this codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design KPI frameworks, metric definitions, targets, guardrails, and measurement plans for product or business decisions. Use when success metrics, drivers, guardrails, targets, or the measurement approach need to be defined or improved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate data visualizations into React and Next.js applications. Use when the user needs chart components, UML-like or architecture diagram components, React integration patterns, Next.js client or server boundaries, hydration-safe rendering, lazy loading, framework-aware performance, scroll-driven visual stories, or export guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose a prioritization framework based on stage, team context, and stakeholder needs. Use when deciding between RICE, ICE, value/effort, or another scoring approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build agents and multi-agent systems with the Swarms framework — the Agent class, tools, autonomous loops, memory, and the 15+ multi-agent architectures (SequentialWorkflow, ConcurrentWorkflow, GraphWorkflow, HierarchicalSwarm, SwarmRouter, and more). Use whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging code that imports `swarms`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Use when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Do NOT use for general code review, debugging, threat modeling (use security-threat-model), or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to build data enrichment workflows, score leads against ICP, set up Clay waterfalls, or improve contact data quality. Also use when the user mentions 'enrichment,' 'data enrichment,' 'Clay,' 'waterfall enrichment,' 'ICP scoring,' 'lead scoring,' 'intent data,' 'contact verification,' 'Apollo,' 'ZoomInfo,' or 'data quality.' This skill covers lead enrichment waterfalls, ICP scoring frameworks, and contact verification systems. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create UGC ad campaigns, recruit UGC creators, generate AI UGC content, or scale with user-generated content. Also use when the user mentions 'UGC,' 'user-generated content,' 'creator ads,' 'Spark Ads,' 'whitelisting,' 'AI UGC,' 'Arcads,' 'Creatify,' 'creator brief,' or 'UGC testing.' This skill covers the UGC growth framework from creator recruitment through AI-powered scaling. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 (ASI) classification framework. Use for mapping security findings to standardized risk categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds Agent-to-Agent (A2A) servers and clients following Google's open protocol for agent interoperability. Use when the user wants to create an A2A-compliant agent, build an Agent Card, implement task management, connect agents across frameworks, set up agent discovery, handle streaming responses, implement push notifications, or orchestrate multi-agent workflows. Trigger words: a2a, agent to agent, agent2agent, a2a protocol, a2a server, a2a client, agent card, agent interoperability, agent collaboration, multi-agent, agent discovery, a2a sdk, a2a task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the work spans several files or replaces a framework, language, auth, storage, or API layer (rewrites and migrations included), and the user wants it to end up working and tested. Asks only what is missing, writes a spec with acceptance criteria, then runs and verifies it in the background. Not for questions, small edits, or an existing Seed (use run).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for developing LLM agents based on PuerTsAgent framework — covers resource directory structure, system-prompt, skills, builtin modules, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to "deploy an agent", "deploy my ADK agent", "set up CI/CD", "configure secrets", "troubleshoot a deployment", or needs guidance on Agent Runtime, Cloud Run, or GKE deployment targets, or binding an agent to an Agent Gateway. Covers deployment workflows, service accounts, rollback, and production infrastructure. Applies to any framework agents-cli deploys (ADK, LangChain, ...). Part of the agents-cli skills suite. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), evaluation (use google-agents-cli-eval), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics, dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. Applies to any agents-cli project, whatever framework the agent is written in. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Java developer skill for AgentScope Java framework - a reactive, message-driven multi-agent system built on Project Reactor. Use when working with reactive programming, LLM integration, agent orchestration, multi-agent systems, or when the user mentions AgentScope, ReActAgent, Mono/Flux, Project Reactor, or Java agent development. Specializes in non-blocking code, tool integration, hooks, pipelines, and production-ready agent applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vitest fast unit testing framework powered by Vite with Jest-compatible API. Use when writing tests, mocking, configuring coverage, or working with test filtering and fixtures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nitro is the framework-agnostic server toolkit (powering Nuxt) for building and deploying web servers anywhere. Use when working with nitro.config, server routes/event handlers, route rules, caching, storage, tasks, websockets, or deploying to Node/Bun/Deno/Cloudflare/Vercel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nuxt full-stack Vue framework with SSR, auto-imports, and file-based routing. Use when working with Nuxt apps, server routes, useFetch, middleware, or hybrid rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。