「implementation」の検索結果

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits .NET test mock usage by tracing each mock setup through the production code's execution path to find dead, unreachable, redundant, or replaceable mocks. Use when the user asks to audit mock usage, find unused or unnecessary mock setups, check if mocks are needed, reduce mock duplication or over-mocking, simplify test setup, or review whether mock configurations like ILogger/IOptions should use real implementations instead. Supports Moq, NSubstitute, and FakeItEasy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add and test declarative behavior-defined agentic engines in gh-aw, extending Go infrastructure only when necessary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate low-stakes retrieval-practice questions with grounded answer notes and implementation guidance. Use for quiz starters, revision activities, delayed recall, misconception checks, or adapting recall difficulty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open a pull request on the Kiln repo for a human to complete. The title gets a `WIP: ` prefix and a semantic-commit type. The description keeps the human-only header of the PR template as empty placeholders, and the agent writes only the Agentic PR Summary below it (one-line TLDR, summary, implementation bullets, warnings, optional Mermaid diagram, collapsible examples and screenshots). The agent never signs the CLA. Also covers the short watch window for review-bot comments and CI. Use when the user asks to open, create, or raise a PR, to write or rewrite a PR description, or to update a PR after a push.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure prediction using OpenFold3, an open-weights PyTorch reproduction of AlphaFold3 from the AlQuraishi Lab. Use this skill when predicting protein/nucleic-acid/ligand complex structures with an Apache-2.0-licensed AF3 reimplementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Rust work after substantial Rust code changes by running `just check`, `just clippy`, then `just format`. Use before the final response after a significant Rust implementation or cleanup task; batch edits first instead of running after every small change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a new AI tool end-to-end — Rust implementation, toolset wiring, infra, schema generation, and frontend UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an implementation plan as one interactive HTML page - a tree of claims (why › what › how › where), each proved by one exhibit (UI mockup, state machine, call stack, schema or code), with the decisions the user has to make placed on the claim they change. Use when the user types /html-plan, or asks for a plan, RFC or design before building something that touches more than a couple of files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building Next.js 14+ applications with App Router, server components, or server actions. Invoke for full-stack features, performance optimization, SEO implementation, production deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract design systems from reference UI images and generate implementation-ready UI design prompts. Use when users provide UI screenshots/mockups and want to create consistent designs, generate design systems, or build MVP UIs matching reference aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute research implementation plans efficiently while maintaining estimation quality and finishing features

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform research descriptions into well-structured implementation plans following project conventions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore methodological approaches through structured analysis before planning implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records an architecture decision as a Nygard/MADR-shaped ADR under decisions/ — capturing the context that forced the choice, the options weighed, the decision itself, and its consequences in both directions, plus the supersedes chain that keeps a decision log honest. Read when asked to record an architecture decision, write an ADR, log the decision we made, document why we chose X over Y, capture this decision for the record, or supersede an old decision with a new one. Do NOT read to frame a proposal or explore an idea not yet decided (frame-a-proposal), to write a spec or implementation plan (write-a-spec), to write an incident postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or to judge whether a design is sound (review-a-design). This skill records a decision already made; it does not make one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

15-agent hierarchical mesh coordination for v3 implementation. Orchestrates parallel execution across security, core, and integration domains following 10 ADRs with 14-week timeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a feature request into a minimal, file-level implementation plan before any code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep agentic-flow@alpha integration implementing ADR-001. Eliminates 10,000+ duplicate lines by building claude-flow as specialized extension rather than parallel implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate new or changed tests, and audit existing tests for low value, implementation coupling, duplication, and the test-only production seams they keep alive. Use when writing, changing, reviewing, or sweeping tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create zero-context implementation plans with bite-sized tasks — use for multi-step feature planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。