「init」の検索結果

First contact with Crabbox: run your repository's tests inside a disposable Docker or Podman container on your own machine, no account and no cloud spend, then stop the box. Use when someone asks what Crabbox is or how to try it, wants a throwaway sandbox for a repo with no crabbox.yaml yet, or is about to run crabbox init here; hand off to the crabbox skill for config that already exists, leased remote machines, jobs, secrets, or artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize evo for the current repository by exploring the codebase, proposing unexplored optimization dimensions, constructing the benchmark inside a baseline worktree, and running the first experiment. Use when the user invokes /evo:discover, mentions setting up evo, wants to instrument a codebase for autonomous optimization, or asks to start a new evo run on a project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidates redundant documentation while preserving all valuable content; keeps a doc set truthful after things change. Modes: (1) POST-CHANGE GOVERNANCE — when code, scripts, config, env vars, ports, paths, deployment, auth, tests, or a documented procedure changed; also "which docs are now wrong", "check docs for inconsistencies", "过时的命令/路径", "文档同步". Use it even when the user mentions only the change and never the docs — updating them is part of the change, not optional cleanup. (2) CONSOLIDATION — "clean up docs", "documentation bloat", "reduce documentation sprawl", "consolidate documentation", "too many doc files", "merge redundant docs", "merge these docs", "文档太多/太乱", multiple files covering the same topic, or documentation exceeding 500 lines across multiple files on similar topics. Finds stale copies of a fact changed in only one place, values that should never have been persisted (counts, totals, "N items", restated summaries), rival definitions that drift apart, and orphaned cross-references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and designs safe Terraform releases, provisioners (remote-exec/local-exec/file, cloud-init, Compose, Caddy), multi-environment isolation, and fresh-host bootstrap. Use when writing or reviewing plan/apply wrappers or provisioners; when staging/production config may differ; when a rollout can mutate a shared gateway; or debugging drift, TLS, container restarts, DNS duplication, or snapshot contamination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Switches or repairs an OpenClaw instance's model config: changes the default model, adds model definitions, and fixes 401 "Invalid token", "No available channel / model not found", "Thinking level X is not supported", or a config edit that doesn't take effect. Use for 切换模型/换模型/升级模型 or 模型配的错了. Not for plain config audits (use openclaw).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review what an LLM feature or agent actually puts in its context window — and find what's bloating, missing, or fighting itself. Use when asked to review a system prompt and context assembly, cut token usage without losing quality, debug an agent that ignores instructions, or audit how retrieval results, history, and tool definitions are packed into the window. Produces a context inventory with a keep/cut/restructure verdict per component, ordering and caching fixes, and a token budget. For wording-level prompt tuning use prompt-optimizer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a cross-team project with the collaboration contract that prevents the classic collisions — who decides what, how work flows between teams, the communication channels and cadence, and what done means — agreed before the first collision instead of during it. Use when asked kick off this cross-team project right, our two teams keep colliding, define how we'll work with the other team, or set up the partnership before we start. Produces the one-page contract: decision rights, interfaces, cadence, and the done-definition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a cohort analysis for retention, LTV, or behavioural patterns. Use when asked to run a cohort analysis, analyse retention by cohort, segment users by behaviour over time, or calculate lifetime value by acquisition period. Produces a complete cohort analysis framework with methodology, cohort definitions, retention curves, and prioritised interventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a CI/CD pipeline playbook for a service or team. Use when asked to document a CI/CD pipeline, write a deployment process, define release gates, document build and test stages, or create a deployment guide. Produces a structured playbook covering pipeline stages, environment definitions, deployment gates, rollback procedures, and on-call responsibilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work out whether you're eligible for a class-action settlement or refund program — and actually file the claim before the deadline. Use when asked am I owed money from a settlement, is there a class action for [product/company], how do I claim a settlement, or did I qualify for that refund. Produces a way to check for relevant settlements, an eligibility read against the class definition, the proof you need and how to file, deadline tracking, and honest expectations on payout size — plus how to avoid fake-settlement scams. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a structured change management plan for any organisational change. Use when asked to write a change management plan, manage a change initiative, plan a system rollout, or lead an organisational transformation. Produces a plan covering stakeholder analysis, impact assessment, communication strategy, and resistance management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure AI and ML product decisions with the rigour of any product decision. Use when building AI-powered features, evaluating LLM integrations, designing AI products, or assessing AI readiness. Produces a complete AI product canvas covering problem definition, model approach, data requirements, evaluation framework, UX design, responsible AI checklist, and launch monitoring plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an evaluation plan for an LLM or AI feature before shipping it. Use when asked how to evaluate a prompt/model/agent, set up an eval harness, define quality metrics for an AI feature, or build a regression gate. Produces an eval plan — task definition, datasets, metrics & rubrics, baselines, automated + human evals, a pass bar, and a regression gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify the tracing, metrics, and alerting for an AI agent or LLM feature in production. Use when asked what to log for an LLM app, design agent tracing or spans, define quality and cost monitors, or answer 'how do we know if the agent is misbehaving?'. Produces an observability spec with a trace schema, metric definitions with owners and alert thresholds, sampling and retention policy, and a privacy note for logged content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Octane bindings for TanStack DB. useLiveQuery hook with dependency arrays (8 overloads: query function, config object, pre-created collection, disabled state via returning undefined/null). useLiveSuspenseQuery for Octane Suspense with Error Boundaries (data always defined). useLiveInfiniteQuery for cursor-based pagination (pageSize, fetchNextPage, hasNextPage, isFetchingNextPage). usePacedMutations for debounced Octane state updates. Return shape: data, state, collection, status, isLoading, isReady, isError. Import from @octanejs/tanstack-db (re-exports all of @tanstack/db).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this methodology when collaboratively shaping a solution with the user - iterating on problem definition (requirements) and solution options (shapes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users navigate the end-to-end negotiation process for product and engineering roles, from initial recruiter calls to evaluating startup equity and final offer signing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and iterate custom add-ons/templates with tanstack add-on init, add-on compile, add-on dev, and tanstack create --dev-watch, including sync loop preconditions, watch-path validation, and project metadata constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening AAMAS reproducibility evidence for interaction claims, including proofs and game definitions, opponent and population sets, self-play protocols, random seeds, compute, uncertainty on strategic outcomes, baselines, and consistency between what the paper claims about agents and what the artifact can actually show.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing AAMAS supplementary material - proofs, extended game and mechanism definitions, extra multiagent experiments, opponent-set details, and the anonymized artifact zip - under the size cap, anonymity, and reviewer-discretion limits, including how to split a game-theory-plus-experiments paper across the 8-page body and the supplement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。