2,351 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Execute tasks through systematic exploration, pruning, and expansion using Tree of Thoughts methodology with meta-judge evaluation specifications and multi-agent evaluation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
郑希观点库——基于易方达基金经理郑希 2012–2026 年全部公开观点原文语料，外加从语料蒸馏、有本人原话佐证的郑希投资方法的可溯源 research skill。能做： (1) 溯源问答——他怎么看 AI算力/光通信/新能源/半导体/ROE 等，引用其原话作答； (2) 讲解他的投资方法/框架/选股逻辑；(3) 前瞻应用——用他的方法分析当下任意主题/行业/个股，语料没谈过也能据框架推演； (4) 风格化点评——用他季报/手记的口吻写市场点评、季度展望； (5) 言行对照——用他全部基金真实数据（季度持仓/净值/业绩/规模/任职回报）核对"说的"与"买的"，或答他的业绩/重仓/规模； (6) 全市场查询对比——内置约 2.7 万只基金列表，按需抓任意基金真实数据做查询或与郑希对比； (7) 郑希框架评分——给一只基金按他的方法打分（多像郑希会买的）。 When the user mentions 郑希/易方达郑希/zhengxi, asks his view on a sector/stock/theme, his 投资方法/框架/选股/风格/持仓/业绩/净值/规模, wants to apply his approach, a commentary 用郑希口吻, to check words vs holdings, or to look up/compare/score ANY China mutual fund (任意基金/某基金经理/同类对比/给基金打分)——use this skill, even if they don't say "skill", even if the topic isn't in his corpus (fall back to his method). 引用忠于原文、不杜撰；推演与原话区分。研究学习辅助，非投资建议。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Worked qupai-system (曲牌体) opera scripts, act by act. Guan Hanqing's three surviving zaju (窦娥冤／救风尘／金线池 — twelve acts, 126 tunes, one mode and one rhyme per act, sung/spoken ratios); Tang Xianzu's 牡丹亭 (55 scenes, ~420 tunes, 集唐 closing quatrains, the 圆驾 south-north composite suite); Kong Shangren's 桃花扇 (44 scenes plus four unnumbered, the 副末 frame line, upper/lower halves, a fan's seven transformations, his sixteen 凡例); 长生殿 (Wang Jilie's fifty-scene staging table); Wei Minglun's 巴山秀才 (1983 Sichuan 高腔, 43 tunes, nine 帮腔 passages). Every case states its edition and collation status, then structure, tunes, stage conventions and transferable devices. Method is in sw-chinese-opera-qupai; this skill holds the worked scripts. Use when you want a real example of how a 传奇 or 杂剧 is assembled, need actual scene counts and tune counts to imitate, are judging where a famous script breaks prosody, or need models for 副末开场, 集唐下场诗, 南北合套 or 帮腔 (曲牌体全本／牡丹亭／桃花扇／窦娥冤／救风尘／长生殿／巴山秀才／唱段表／结构表).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Worked full-length scripts of banqiang-system Chinese opera with their creation records (板腔体全本语料库). Primary texts; 翁偶虹《锁麟囊》 (the revised score edition, 65 arias, 15 self-account-vs-score checks), 汪曾祺等《沙家浜》 (the 1965 text, not the 1970 one; 36 arias, a 12-row two-version diff), 田汉《白蛇传》 (the 1955 book, not the web revision; 16 scenes, 王瑶卿说腔五条), 杨兰春《朝阳沟》 (1978 revival, 50 arias, 口语入唱, per-scene sung/spoken ratios), 魏明伦《潘金莲》 (跨时空, missing pages), 罗怀臻's 越剧《李清照》《真假驸马》, 淮剧《金龙与蜉蝣》, 甬剧《典妻》; plus index tables of 翁偶虹's 60 创作记 and 范钧宏's seven 改编札记. Use when you want to see how a 唱工戏 lays out its 板式, need real scene counts, aria counts and 辙口 to imitate, want the road from raw material to 审腔, are writing a 现代戏 or colloquial lyrics, or compare one author across two声腔 systems. Method is in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang; this skill holds the worked scripts and their creation records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 fresh-context subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist. Use for submission-ready or R&R-stage papers where single-pass review isn't enough.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compute statistical power, required sample size, and minimum detectable effect (MDE) for a study design, then write a registry-ready power section. Handles two-arm RCTs (with clustering / ICC and unequal allocation), multiple-arm corrections, and a simulation-based power option for non-standard designs (DiD/event-study, IV, panel). Use when user says "power analysis", "power calculation", "MDE", "minimum detectable effect", "how big a sample do I need", "is my study powered", "power for an RCT", or when /preregister needs a power section for an experiment. Produces a power/MDE table, power curves, and a methods paragraph to paste into a preregistration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dontbesilent 对标分析。用五重过滤法帮你找到值得模仿的对标，排除一切关于「我」的噪音。 触发方式：/dbs-benchmark、/对标、「帮我找对标」「我该模仿谁」 Benchmark analysis using dontbesilent's five-filter method. Trigger: /dbs-benchmark, "find me a benchmark", "who should I copy"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dontbesilent 慢就是快。帮创业者找到看起来更慢但长期更快的方法，用摩擦建造资产。 触发方式：/dbs-slowisfast、/慢就是快、「有没有更慢的方法」「我是不是太快了」 Slow-is-fast diagnosis. Help entrepreneurs find seemingly slower methods that build assets through friction. Trigger: /dbs-slowisfast, "is there a slower way", "am I going too fast"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build event-driven, decoupled Godot 4.7 gameplay with signals and node groups: declare and emit custom signals, connect with Callables (incl. bind/one-shot), and broadcast to many nodes via groups and call_group. Use when wiring node communication in a Godot project, replacing tight references with signals, emitting/connecting events, or porting 3.x connect("sig", self, "method") code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract factual claims from PR copy, verify each claim independently, attach concrete citations, and warn when certainty is low. Runs each claim through proven newsroom verification methods (lateral reading, source-tier climbing, provenance pillars, triangulation, calibrated rating) and puts the burden of proof on the speaker. Use before a pitch, press release, reactive comment, DM, or other journalist-facing draft is trusted or sent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like 'make the test pass', 'test coverage', or 'unit tests before implementation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, refresh, report, or probe an accessibility coverage matrix across criteria, surfaces, and evidence methods. Use when assessing coverage with the accessibility runtime harness and generated evidence bundle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Export Design Thinking artifacts to a FigJam board or Figma Design file through the Figma MCP server. Use when a team wants collaborative visual review of Method 1, 3, 4, 5, or 6 artifacts, or accepts a DT Coach board-export offer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision-driven HVE-Core installer with multiple clone-based and extension install methods, environment detection, and selective component installation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design Thinking learning curriculum covering nine progressive modules across the full Problem, Solution, and Implementation Space methods plus a shared manufacturing reference scenario for teaching and practice
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design Thinking coaching foundation knowledge: coach identity and philosophy, quality and fidelity constraints, method sequencing, coaching state schema, and the canonical deck workflow
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make a genuinely good drink from the bottles already on your shelf — no special trip, no 12-ingredient recipe. Use when asked what can I make with [spirits], cocktail from what I have, I've got [bottles] what can I drink, or make me a drink without buying anything. Produces two or three cocktails you can build right now with ratios, a method, sensible substitutions for what you're missing, and a zero-proof version — scaled to how many you're making.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan preparation for the Chinese postgraduate entrance examination (考研): choosing target schools and programmes with realistic odds, a phased study plan for the national subjects and the specialist papers, and preparation for the re-examination (复试) and adjustment (调剂). Use when asked 考研怎么规划, 帮我做考研复习计划, 择校择专业, 考研时间线, 复试怎么准备, 调剂, or plan my kaoyan. Produces a school-and-programme shortlist method with the data to collect, a month-by-month study plan by subject, weekly templates, the key-date checklist to confirm against official notices, and a 复试 and 调剂 preparation guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a cohort analysis for retention, LTV, or behavioural patterns. Use when asked to run a cohort analysis, analyse retention by cohort, segment users by behaviour over time, or calculate lifetime value by acquisition period. Produces a complete cohort analysis framework with methodology, cohort definitions, retention curves, and prioritised interventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a tiered classroom behavior intervention plan (BIP) for a K-12 student, grounded in the function of the behavior. Use when asked to plan a behavior intervention, address a disruptive or off-task pattern, write a BIP, or set up positive behavior supports. Produces a function hypothesis, prevention/antecedent strategies, teaching of a replacement behavior, a response plan for when it happens, and a simple data-tracking method — positive and skill-building, not punitive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and risk-rate hidden assumptions in a product brief or PRD. Use when asked to review a product brief for assumptions, audit a PRD for risks, find hidden assumptions, validate product plans, or run an assumption analysis. Produces a prioritised assumption map with confidence and impact scores, recommended validation methods, and critical assumption flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。