「sme」の検索結果

60-Second Property Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents for fast property evaluation with signal, key factors, and CTA for full analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective unit tests with Jest, Vitest, or pytest. Covers the test-doubles taxonomy (stub/spy/mock/fake), Arrange-Act-Assert, coverage threshold configuration and CI gating, snapshot testing, fake timers, and mutation testing with Stryker/mutmut. Use when: "unit test," "Jest," "Vitest," "pytest," "mock," "coverage threshold," "test doubles," "mutation testing," "fake timers," "snapshot test." Not for: interpreting coverage reports or finding coverage gaps — use coverage-analysis; AI generating the test code for you — use ai-test-generation; auditing existing tests for smells — use ai-qa-review; browser/component rendering assertions — use cypress-automation or visual-testing. Related: coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, ai-test-generation, shift-left-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface risks through guided questioning, helping users consider pivots, constraints, and prioritization during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Triggers on requests to identify risks, stress-test the idea, perform red team review, or when user asks "what could go wrong?", "identify risks", "red team", "risk assessment", "challenge assumptions", "stress test the idea". Consumes all prior IDs (CFD-, BR-, FEA-, PER-, UJ-, SCR-) as interview context. Outputs RISK- entries with owner decisions and mitigations. Feeds v0.5 Technical Stack Selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test any application — web apps, native macOS apps, Electron apps, CLI tools, interactive REPLs, or anything on screen. Three modes: browser (chromux/CDP, fast, DOM-level), computer (MCP computer-use, screenshot + pixel clicks, any app), and cli (tmux, send-keys + capture-pane for interactive terminals). Auto-selects mode or accepts --browser / --computer / --cli override. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "test this app", "find bugs", "test and fix", "fix what's broken", "dogfood", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "QA this app", "사이트 테스트", "앱 테스트", "브라우저 QA", "화면 보고 테스트해줘", "네이티브 앱 테스트", "screen test". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified multi-platform paid media audit with parallel execution. Spawns scored audits for Google Ads, Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads simultaneously, merges results into a budget-weighted aggregate health score (A-F), adds cross-platform analysis (budget allocation, tracking consistency, creative alignment, attribution overlap), and produces a prioritized action plan. Optionally generates a client-ready deck via pro-deck-builder. Use when the user asks for a full paid media audit, cross-platform review, or multi-channel ad assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished HTML technical reports and multi-page documents for consulting deliverables. Includes a customizable design system with dark cover page, warm cream content pages (8.5x11 portrait), professional typography, and a curated component library (KPI cards, data tables with severity coloring, callout boxes, recommendation cards, priority banners). Trigger on report, audit report, technical document, written report, assessment, or multi-page document. Outputs standalone HTML files exported to PDF via Chrome headless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in creating rich backstories, fictional universes, and ARGs (Alternate Reality Games). Covers world-building, mystery construction, community-driven storytelling, and transmedia narratives. Knows how to create depth that rewards exploration without overwhelming. Use when "lore, world building, backstory, ARG, mythology, fictional universe, hidden story, deep canon, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git is deceptively simple to learn and incredibly hard to master. The difference between a team that ships and a team that fights merge conflicts all day comes down to workflow discipline. Your git history is documentation - make it tell a story future you can understand. This skill covers branching strategies (trunk-based, gitflow, GitHub flow), commit hygiene, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and the commands you actually need. Key insight: most git disasters come from not understanding what you're about to do. 2025 lesson: Trunk-based development with short-lived branches has won. Long-lived feature branches are a code smell. If a branch lives more than a few days, something is wrong with your architecture or process. Use when "git workflow, branching strategy, git merge, git rebase, merge conflict, git commit, trunk-based, gitflow, git history, git revert, git reset, git, version-control, workflow, branching, commits, merge, rebase, collaboration" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in designing and structuring online courses - curriculum architecture, learning outcomes, module design, and assessment strategies. Covers backward design methodology, scaffolding content, and creating courses that actually deliver transformation. Use when "create a course, course curriculum, course outline, learning outcomes, course structure, design a course, online course, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in decision-making frameworks - systematic approaches to making better decisions under uncertainty. Covers decision criteria, reversibility assessment, stakeholder alignment, and decision documentation. Knows when to decide fast and when to deliberate. Use when "decision framework, how to decide, making a choice, tradeoff, should we, pros and cons, decision matrix, weighing options, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeping codebases healthy, performant, and maintainable - refactoring, performance optimization, and technical debt managementUse when "refactor, optimize, performance, technical debt, cleanup, architecture, speed up, bundle size, memory leak, slow query, code smell, complexity, dead code, performance, refactoring, optimization, technical-debt, architecture, cleanup, bundle, memory" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with climate data, models, and projections for climate impact assessment, downscaling, and scenario analysis using CMIP6 and other climate datasets. Use when "climate model, climate projection, CMIP6, climate data, downscaling, climate scenario, RCP, SSP, global warming, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarksUse when "agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent, testing, evaluation, benchmark, agents, reliability, quality" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backlink profile audit via the DataForSEO Backlinks API. Returns total backlinks, referring domains, dofollow ratio, top anchors with over-optimization flags, top referring domains by authority, and a toxicity assessment with an Authority Score (0-100).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documents rollback procedures before making risky changes. Covers what's changing, verification steps, rollback procedures, and blast radius assessment. Use before database migrations, breaking API changes, infrastructure or DNS changes, large dependency upgrades, or any change where undo is not obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strips AI-generation "smell" from prose before it ships (READMEs, docs, release notes, PR descriptions, posts, emails). Counts measurable tells first (keyword saturation, tricolons and anaphora, the "not X, it's Y" reflex, fragment-for-emphasis, bolded thesis lines, listicle-ization, signpost phrases, filler vocabulary, em-dashes, engineered-quotable closers), then applies a "doing work or reflex?" test to each instance so genuine voice survives. Use when asked to de-slop text or make it sound human, when text reads as machine-written, and as the final pass on prose the agent drafted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform threat modeling for a system or feature. Use when a senior developer needs security risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate third-party vendors for engineering fit. Use when a senior developer needs a structured vendor assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit dependencies for licensing, security, and maintenance risk. Use when a senior developer needs risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a system for growth bottlenecks. Use when a senior developer needs to evaluate scaling limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。