「stat」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "build our social crisis protocol", "mentions are exploding — what do we do first", or "when do we pause the posting queue"; produces a 1-5 severity ladder with tunable Estimated trigger thresholds (mention-velocity multiples vs the 7-day listening baseline, sentiment flip, journalist/regulator contact, employee-conduct class), the first-mechanical-action rule — pause ALL scheduled posts AND paid amplification, with dated state markers dropped to the channels proposal protocol and reconciled post-incident — a pre-approved holding-statement library with committed update cadences, when-NOT-to-post rules, a spokesperson/approval matrix, and a post-crisis retro template; re-runs the social-quality-auditor pre-publish gate before un-pausing the queue. Not for email deliverability incidents (blocklist, spam-rate spikes) — use deliverability-qa; inside a launch window launch-day-conductor owns incident handling. 社媒危机预案/暂停队列/声明库/发言人矩阵

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map our positioning", "name our competitive alternatives", or "pick a beachhead segment for the launch"; produces a Dunford-style positioning canvas — named competitive alternatives (including spreadsheet and status quo), unique attributes (verifiable, or routed to the claims ledger), value themes (attribute→benefit→value chains), a target beachhead segment scored on serviceability / pain intensity / reachability, and a one-sentence onlyness statement — the sole upstream of the message house and the entity-signal source for the canonical entity profile. Not for the message house or per-channel launch copy — use message-house-builder; not for audience/persona profiling itself — use audience-mapper; not for SEO keyword positioning — use keyword-research. 定位画布/竞争替代品/独特价值/滩头细分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify one micro-interaction completely — trigger, rules, feedback, loops, and modes. Use when handing a single interaction to engineering. For motion craft alone use `animation-principles`; for multi-state components use `state-machine`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smart context compaction with state preservation. Saves critical files, task progress, and working state before compaction, restores after. Use before manual compact or when auto-compact triggers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS Startups reference content — Activate FAQ, credits guide, programs, partner offers, sample architectures, and hundreds of learn articles spanning generative AI, cloud architecture, cost optimization, security, fundraising, go-to-market, and real-world startup case studies. Use when the user asks factual questions about AWS Activate (eligibility, credits, programs, providers), wants a sample architecture or solution guide, or needs an AWS-curated learn article on a specific startup topic. For copy-paste AI prompts (RAG chatbot, MVP scaffold, security baseline, GPU quota, etc.), see the prompt-library-for-startups skill. Do not use for: account-specific lookups (credits balance, Activate membership status, application status), real-time event listings beyond the events stub, or content not present in the bundled `references/` tree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates vibe-coded web applications to AWS. Handles the full workflow from analysis through migration to deployment, producing deployable AWS Blocks infrastructure code. Supports full-stack apps built with vibe-coding platforms (Lovable, Bolt.new, Replit) and frontend web applications and websites: React, Vue, Angular, Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, SvelteKit, Gatsby, Vite, Svelte, Solid, Docusaurus, and others (static sites, SPAs, and SSR frameworks with static export). Triggers on: launch with AWS, launch on AWS, deploy to AWS, migrate to AWS, host my app on AWS, move my app to AWS, transfer my app to AWS. Activates when the user wants to migrate a vibe-coded app or frontend web app to AWS, even if they don't say 'migrate' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React useEffect best practices from official docs. Use when writing/reviewing useEffect, useState for derived values, data fetching, or state synchronization. Teaches when NOT to use Effect and better alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSRF testing playbook. Use when reviewing state-changing web flows, anti-CSRF defenses, SameSite behavior, JSON CSRF, login CSRF, and OAuth state handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging Terraform/OpenTofu modules, tests, CI, scans, or state ops - diagnoses failure mode (identity churn, secrets, blast radius, CI drift, state corruption) with version-aware guards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans and drives cross-functional programs to delivery — scope, sequencing, dependencies, status, risk, and the escalations that keep work moving. Use this to run a multi-team initiative, recover a program that is slipping, build a delivery plan with dependencies, structure status reporting, or diagnose why cross-team work keeps missing dates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes down what is being built so a team can build it and know when they are done — problem and success measure before solution, scope stated by exclusion, user-visible behavior including the states everyone forgets, acceptance criteria someone can test, and the open questions named rather than buried. Use this to write a specification, review one that is causing rework, or work out why a delivered feature technically matched the request and still was not what anyone wanted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a set of financial statements and establishes what changed and why — fluctuation analysis against prior period and against budget, profitability, liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios, benchmarking, and the non-GAAP measures presented alongside them. Use this to interpret results, review a counterparty's or target's financials, diagnose a deteriorating trend, explain a variance to someone who will act on it, or test whether an adjusted number is honest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when concurrent actors might write to the same file, branch, key, or state object. Eliminate the sharing first; serialize structurally only when one shared writer is a real invariant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before starting or resuming work, and before telling the user that something was never recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when designing types, reviewing a function signature, or writing code in any statically-typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand semantic primitives, parse external data at boundaries, refuse to lie to the compiler, exhaust variants, derive from authoritative schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update the status of a plan step. MUST call after completing each step to track progress. Status values - pending, in_progress, completed, failed, skipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get memory system statistics including total count and breakdown by type. When you need to check memory usage or understand memory distribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a Meta-analysis results section description for funnel plots, including statistical tables (Egger's, Begg's, Trim & Fill) and figure legends. Supports English and Chinese outputs. Use when user provides a funnel plot image and statistics and wants a formatted report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion statements for academic applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizes the evidence and competitive landscape around a drug, target, or pathway by separating disease relevance, tractability, preclinical evidence, clinical evidence, modality fit, and crowding. Always map what is biologically supported, what is druggable, what has actually advanced, and what remains strategically open. Never confuse target relevance with druggability, preclinical activity with clinical promise, or narrative excitement with validated development maturity. Never fabricate references, trial status, approval status, company activity, or asset metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。