2,493 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
VERIFY your changes work. Measure CLS, detect theme flicker, test visual stability, check performance. Use BEFORE and AFTER making changes to confirm fixes. Includes ready-to-run scripts: measure-cls.ts, detect-flicker.ts
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for the GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) algorithm. Use when implementing, debugging, or verifying a GRPO training pipeline — covers the mathematical formulation (group-relative advantages, clipped surrogate loss, KL penalty), the training loop (generate → score → advantage → loss), log-probability computation, advantage estimation, and relationship to PPO/REINFORCE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and verify loop invariants for correctness proofs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process the Refinery merge queue - collect agent work, detect and resolve conflicts, merge in dependency order, and verify integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to review, verify, or audit a report, manuscript, or analysis in the workspace for traceability — resolving citations, flagging numbers with no source, and checking figures against the code that generated them. Emits a structured review block the app renders as reviewer findings. Verifies traceability, never "correctness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A test skill that says hello. Use when you want to test skill loading or verify that the skill system is working.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a reference image, screenshot, or mockup into token-driven, accessible code — infer the design system from the reference (palette, type scale, spacing, radius, layout archetype), map it to the 3-tier tokens, rebuild it, then verify with the kit's gates. Use when the user provides a design/screenshot and wants matching UI code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep Figma and code in sync — map the 3-tier DTCG tokens to Figma Variables (collections + modes), sync in either direction, use the Figma MCP when connected, and verify component parity (variants/states). Use when the user wants to push tokens/components to Figma, pull a design into code, set up token↔Variable sync, or check design-code drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to process documentation by running baseline without skill, writing to address failures, iterating to close loopholes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or editing any prompt (commands, hooks, skills, subagent instructions) to verify it produces desired behavior - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to prompt engineering using subagents for isolated testing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify what PR review comments have been addressed (committed/pushed OR uncommitted local changes) and resolve the threads that are genuinely fixed or no longer relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating effective skills. This command should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a test fails and you need to diagnose the root cause. Run the test, read errors, trace through generated and source code, fix, and verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove that the file you are about to send, publish, or hand off IS the thing you mean — before it leaves your hands. Rebuild from source, check integrity, diff the derived artifact against its source, and require the recipient to echo what they received. Use before sending a paper/PDF for review, shipping a release or replication package, handing files to a coauthor or collaborator, uploading anything to an external reviewer or model, or publishing. Prevents an entire review/QA cycle from being spent on defects that exist only in the artifact, not in the work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Live Borg debugging by exec-ing into the borg-web-ui Docker container. Use when debugging borg commands, writing tests against real borg output, developing borg 2.0 features, or verifying borg behavior before writing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。