「when」の検索結果

Delegate a coding task to Oh My Pi (`omp`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to delegate implementation work to Oh My Pi / omp - phrasings like "have omp implement X", "delegate this to oh my pi", "run it through omp", "use oh-my-pi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through omp while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, when the user wants the code written directly without delegating, or when they mean the original Pi CLI (`pi`) — that is pi-delegate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to the Grok Build CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Grok — phrasings like "have Grok do X", "delegate this to Grok", "run it through Grok", "use Grok Build to implement/fix/refactor", or "have grok CLI do this" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Grok while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate dark-mode-compatible inline SVG data visualization charts for blog posts. Supports horizontal bar, grouped bar, donut, line, lollipop, area, and radar charts with automatic platform detection (HTML vs JSX/MDX). Enforces chart type diversity, accessible markup (role=img, aria-labelledby), source attribution, and transparent backgrounds. Use whenever the user mentions data visualization, charts, graphs, comparison tables that need to be visualized, or wants to embed inline SVG visualizations in a blog post, even if not invoking blog-write. Use when user says "blog chart", "generate chart", "data visualization", "svg chart", "blog graph", "visualize data", or when the blog-write workflow identifies chart-worthy data points (3+ comparable metrics, trends, before/after data).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LoongCollector E2E Testing Framework Development Guide. Use this rule when you need to understand E2E testing framework architecture, develop new test behavior functions, or extend testing capabilities. Contains detailed BDD testing framework usage, test behavior function development and registration workflows, and comprehensive reference of existing testing capabilities. Example: When adding custom test behaviors for new plugins, use this rule to understand how to write and register new test functions. Example: When developing E2E tests, use this rule to understand the e2e framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create or update their app marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions "app context", "marketing brief", "app positioning", or when starting any ASO or app marketing project. This is the foundation skill — all other skills check for this context first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to improve their app's star rating, increase ratings volume, optimize when and how they prompt users for a review, or recover from a bad rating period. Use when the user mentions "app rating", "star rating", "review prompt", "SKStoreReviewRequest", "In-App Review API", "ask for review", "low rating", "rating drop", "get more reviews", or "recover from 1-star". For responding to reviews, see review-management. For overall ASO health, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure a Next.js app using posthog-js so session recording and dead-click capture survive browser ad blockers. Aliases the three blocker-flagged JS chunks (dead-clicks-autocapture.js, recorder.js, posthog-recorder.js) to bland same-origin paths via Next.js rewrites, and monkey-patches HTMLScriptElement so posthog-js requests the aliases. TRIGGER when posthog-js session replay or dead-click capture is failing in production with ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT or 404s on /static/dead-clicks-autocapture.js / /static/recorder.js / /static/posthog-recorder.js, or when the user wants to bypass ad blockers for these specific assets. Works alongside an existing PostHog reverse proxy (managed or otherwise) — only the three blocked files divert through Next.js, all other PostHog traffic stays on the original api_host. SKIP for unrelated PostHog setup, non-Next.js apps, or when capture/decide endpoints (/e/, /decide/, /array/*/config.js) are the ones being blocked — those need a different treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train and run models on Tinker (Thinking Machines) — LoRA and full fine-tuning, SFT with correct loss masking, RL/RFT with group-relative advantages and importance sampling, agentic RL over multi-turn tool-using agents, inference via the SamplingClient or the OpenAI-compatible endpoint, checkpoint management and export, every hyperparameter, and cost estimation from the live price table. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Tinker, tinker://, TINKER_API_KEY, console.tinker.ai, or the tinker CLI; wants to fine-tune, SFT, RFT, or RL a model on Tinker; asks about Tinker models, context windows, LoRA rank, sampling params, loss functions (cross_entropy, importance_sampling, ppo, cispo, dro), Datum construction, forward_backward or optim_step; wants to sample from, download, resume, merge, or export a Tinker checkpoint; or asks what a Tinker run will cost. Whenever Tinker work is initialized in a project, this skill also creates a TINKER_PRICING.md there so prices sit next to the training code. Reach for it even on vague asks like "train a model on this data" or "get inference working" when Tinker is the platform in play.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives implementation by writing a failing test first, then the smallest code that passes it. Use this before writing implementation code for any feature or bugfix, when a bug needs a regression test, when existing code is hard to change safely, or when someone asks whether a change is covered. Also use to decide what is worth testing and what is not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the root cause of a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fix. Use this whenever something is broken and the cause is not yet proven — a failing test, a production error, intermittent behavior, or a symptom that appeared after a change. Also use when a fix has been attempted and did not work, or when the same bug keeps coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies what could go wrong in a system before it is built or changed — the assets worth attacking, the entry points, the trust boundaries, and the controls that actually address the realistic threats. Use this when designing a feature or system, when a change touches authentication, data handling, payments, or external input, before a security review, or when deciding which security work is worth doing at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a spec or requirement into a written plan a separate session or agent can execute, then drives that plan through review checkpoints. Use this before touching code on any multi-step task, when work needs handing to someone else, when a task keeps sprawling mid-implementation, or when a plan exists and needs executing in order with verification between steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores the problem and the range of possible approaches before any code is written — clarifying what is actually being asked, surfacing options with their tradeoffs, and converging on one. Use this at the start of any feature, component, or behavior change, when a request is ambiguous, when the first idea is the only idea on the table, or when a design decision needs pressure-testing before commitment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the marketing plan of record — objectives, channel mix, budget allocation, sequencing, and the measurement that says whether it worked. Use this for annual or quarterly planning, when budget must be allocated or defended, when marketing activity feels busy but undirected, or when a plan needs pressure-testing before commitment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures how a person or brand actually writes and turns it into reusable voice instructions every other content skill draws from. Use this before drafting any content for a new brand or client, when output keeps coming back sounding generic, when several writers need to sound like one, or when a voice needs defining without existing samples to learn from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, runs, and synthesizes customer research — interviews, surveys, win-loss analysis, and message testing — into findings that change decisions. Use this when the customer is being guessed at, before positioning or a major launch, when churn or conversion has an unexplained cause, or when a team is arguing from anecdotes. Also use to turn raw interview notes into usable findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold, before a large irreversible commitment, or when a market, regulatory, or technology shift could invalidate the strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles customer situations that have exceeded normal support — severity assessment, incident communication, executive escalation, and recovering a relationship after a failure. Use this when a customer issue is escalating or has gone to leadership, during a customer-affecting outage, when a major account is at risk, when a relationship needs repairing after a failure, or to design the escalation path itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。