スキルを探す

Draft newsletter and nurture email copy with brand voice, structured sections, and conversion-focused CTAs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and validate email addresses using Snov.io via Chrome DevTools MCP. Takes LinkedIn profile URLs and returns verified emails. Replaces ZeroBounce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor competitor blogs and industry publications to surface content opportunities

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LinkedIn connection requests and DM sequences adapted to tool stack

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-channel personalized message generation with 3 tiers of personalization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured creative briefs for ad designers with brand-consistent direction

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific person for hyperpersonalized outreach using their public activity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-page SEO optimization for existing content with before/after scoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep technical SEO audit covering Core Web Vitals, crawlability, indexation, structured data, canonical/hreflang, redirect chains, and site architecture. Complements seo-auditor which focuses on on-page/off-page factors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-touch attribution analysis across marketing channels with multiple models

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze conversion funnel drop-offs and identify biggest leak points with impact-ranked recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a website for CRO issues and AI automation opportunities, returning actionable findings with outreach hooks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates platform-native social media posts for LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit. Supports thought leadership, case study snippets, hot takes, engagement questions, carousel outlines, and threads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates full long-form content: whitepapers, eBooks, research reports, and pillar pages. Takes a content brief and produces 2000-5000 word drafts with sections, data points, and CTAs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft professional emails for various contexts including business, technical, and customer communication. Use when the user needs help writing emails or composing professional messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous benchmarking of multi-agent coordination systems: experiment design, statistical analysis, human evaluation protocols, and reproducible reporting. NOT FOR ML model evaluation (use llm-evaluation-harness), A/B testing for web products, survey design, or general data science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architects the encryption, codec/transport, and premium-feature layer of a group video-calling product, on top of an already-chosen SFU topology. Covers E2EE patterns (Zoom leader-fan-out, Signal pairwise-fan-out, MLS/TreeKEM as in Discord's DAVE, Telegram's ledger consensus), the SFrame (RFC 9605) + WebRTC Insertable Streams mechanism letting an SFU relay encrypted frames it can't read, codec/transport choice (AV1/VP9 SVC vs. simulcast, Opus, congestion control, Media-over-QUIC, WHIP/WHEP), and which "premium" features (virtual backgrounds, live captions, recording, breakout rooms, spatial audio) survive E2EE vs. structurally can't. Use when adding E2EE to an SFU-based call, choosing a 2026 codec/SVC strategy, or deciding which features to disable under E2EE mode. NOT for call topology/platform choice (see webrtc-adhoc-video-chat, which this composes with). NOT for one-way broadcast (see managed-video-streaming-pipeline). NOT for the DM/group-chat text backend (see realtime-messaging-backend-architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and review Cloudflare Durable Objects. Use when building stateful coordination (chat rooms, multiplayer games, booking systems), implementing RPC methods, SQLite storage, alarms, WebSockets, or reviewing DO code for best practices. Covers Workers integration, wrangler config, and testing with Vitest. Biases towards retrieval from Cloudflare docs over pre-trained knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational impossibility result proving consensus cannot be guaranteed in asynchronous systems with even one faulty process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure the path from an inbound event (webhook, email, SMS, GitHub comment, file, cron) to an agent spawn in the Port Daddy fleet. Use when wiring trigger sources to agents, reviewing the io-wiring registry, adding a trust/permission gate, hardening output sinks (SSRF/path traversal), scoping tools by provenance, or proving the spawn path is safe against prompt-injection → tool-abuse. Encodes ADR-0093 and the red-team threat model. NOT for generic Coast Guard sandboxing (ADR-0050), the macaroon push-grant gate alone (ADR-0053), or non-fleet code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。