980 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a template", "テンプレート作成", "書式を登録", "XLSXをテンプレート化", "テンプレート登録", "この書式を登録して", "テンプレートを追加", or wants to register a new court document template from an XLSX file.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "calculate child support", "養育費を計算", "婚姻費用を計算", "養育費月額", "婚姻費用分担額", "算定表で計算", or wants deterministic computation of child support or marital cost-sharing under the 令和元年改定 standard.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify", "test", "check installation", "動作確認", "テスト", "ヘルスチェック", or wants to verify that the bengo-toolkit plugin is working correctly.
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-question-at-a-time design interrogation. Use when: 'grill me', 'interrogate this', 'one question at a time', 'brainstorm', 'let's brainstorm', 'let's discuss', or design review start. Produces ADRs and glossary as decisions settle. Do not use for settled designs — load architecture-mode instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: reviewing or producing any external-facing prose — ADRs, proposals, GitHub comments, Telegram messages, cover letters, client drafts, or planner-mode wording. Removes AI-tell patterns and raises writing quality before output leaves the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document technical decisions as Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with context, options considered, and rationale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Half-Quadratic Quantization for LLMs without calibration data. Use when quantizing models to 4/3/2-bit precision without needing calibration datasets, for fast quantization workflows, or when deploying with vLLM or HuggingFace Transformers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and validates quantitative targeted metabolomics assays (MRM/SRM on triple-quadrupole, PRM on high-resolution instruments) to report absolute concentrations. Covers the internal-standard strategy (external cal -> global IS -> standard addition -> stable-isotope-labeled IS), weighted calibration judged by back-calculated %RE not R-squared, ion-ratio quantifier/qualifier confirmation, matrix-effect/recovery characterization, and ICH M10 method validation. Use when quantifying a closed panel of known metabolites with units, building or validating an LC-MS/MS assay, choosing an IS or calibration weighting, or judging whether a reported concentration is trustworthy. For untargeted feature detection see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing; for group statistics see metabolomics/statistical-analysis; for flux/MID/tracing see metabolomics/isotope-tracing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debate multi-agente: 2-4 perspectivas (PM, Arquiteto, QA, Security) debatem decisao tecnica. Output: decisao + rationale + dissenting opinions → ADR. Inspirado no Party Mode do BMAD-METHOD.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture Decision Records — context, decision, consequences, supersession trail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trợ lý khóa học AI Thực Chiến (A20) cho sinh viên VinUni. Dùng skill này khi user gõ /a20 hoặc nhắc đến journal, worklog, ADR, sprint, check PR, tạo PR, setup project A20. Skill giúp sinh viên tự động tạo JOURNAL.md, WORKLOG.md, kiểm tra compliance, và tạo PR đúng format yêu cầu của khóa học.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines cell populations in flow and spectral cytometry through manual gates (rectangle, polygon, quadrant, boolean) and reproducible automated gating (openCyto gating templates, flowDensity data-driven thresholds, flowClust model-based gates), organized as a hierarchical GatingSet (flowWorkspace) and round-tripped with FlowJo via CytoML. Covers the canonical gate order (time -> debris -> singlets -> live -> lineage), FMO-vs-isotype boundary setting, gate-order dependence and recompute semantics, rare-event/MRD gating, and per-population statistics. Use when building a gating strategy, automating a manual FlowJo scheme across samples, choosing manual vs data-driven gates, or extracting population frequencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。