「code quality」の検索結果

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dual-mode UX quality skill — runs a heuristic/accessibility/motion audit on the current codebase, or validates implementation against design mockups. Fixes all issues found and commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing a Formax code handoff: selecting files, generating repomix bundles, and writing a high-quality prompt for WebGPT or another coding agent with clear constraints and validation scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Spring Boot 4.x applications following the best practices. Use this skill: * When developing Spring Boot applications using Spring MVC, Spring Data JPA, Spring Modulith, Spring Security * To create recommended Spring Boot package structure * To implement REST APIs, entities/repositories, service layer, modular monoliths * To use Thymeleaf view templates for building web applications * To write tests for REST APIs and Web applications * To write ArchUnit tests for testing architecture * To configure the recommended plugins and configurations to improve code quality, and testing while using Maven. * To use Spring Boot's Docker Compose support for local development * To create Taskfile for easier execution of common tasks while working with a Spring Boot application

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to set up, install, or refine an agent quality framework in a repository (rules with gates, architecture contracts, proven-red tests, ratchets, playbooks), or when the user says "gap-trap", "gap-trap setup", "gap-trap refine", "gate the rules", or "make the agents' code match the rules".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and improve test coverage meaningfully. Covers Istanbul/V8/coverage.py configuration, coverage gap analysis by risk, coverage-as-ratchet in CI (never let it decrease), PR coverage diff checks, mutation testing for assertion quality, and distinguishing meaningful from vanity coverage. Use when: "code coverage," "coverage gap," "Istanbul," "coverage threshold," "coverage report," "branch coverage." Not for: writing the tests that raise coverage — use unit-testing; coverage as a tracked KPI trend over time — use qa-metrics. Related: unit-testing, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-qa-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-command GitHub repository health audit. Checks for missing standard files, GitHub configuration, branch protection, documentation quality, and code hygiene. Produces a scored health report with prioritized fix recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AgentFlow workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve and rewrite user prompts to reduce ambiguity and improve LLM output quality. Use when a user asks to optimize, refine, clarify, or rewrite a prompt for better results, or when the request is about prompt optimization or prompt rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The implementation engine. Routed to by /sprint (full plan, autonomous) and by executing-plans (scoped batch, checkpoint-gated). One fresh subagent per task — test-first via tdd — followed by spec-compliance review, quality review, and fresh-run verification. No single context accumulates drift, and nothing is accepted on a subagent's word.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit launch readiness; report ship/no-ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-architecture discipline that fixes the shape of a system before anyone builds it: entity schema first, exactly one write path per entity, every unit of work routed to a deterministic automation, an AI agent, or a human decision, every existing tool marked absorb, keep, or kill, and the build sequenced into phases whose completion is proved by a command. Use when scoping an automation or agent build, deciding whether a workflow needs a model at all, consolidating a sprawling tool stack, designing the data model under a workflow, choosing a migration path off an old system, or ordering a build so nothing lands on a moving foundation. NOT FOR: executing a planned multi-file repo change (use suede-graph-flo-xr); coordinating parallel builders with file ownership (use suede-agent-teams); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); proving agent output quality against an eval set (use suede-ai-eval); reviewing the finished diff (use suede-code-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer. Analyze PR changes for correctness, security, performance, and quality. Returns findings as JSON. CRITICAL: this skill is costly, don't use it unless user explicitly requested to use it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Encode Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great. From the creator of Sonner (13M+ weekly npm downloads), Vaul, animations.dev, and Linear's web team. Use when user wants to polish UI, audit animations, review component interactions, add micro-feedback, or elevate motion quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing tests for data or ML code — what to test at each layer (transforms, schemas, properties, pipeline smoke, model-quality thresholds, determinism and parity), how to build small synthetic fixtures, and what not to test

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for AI-driven English-to-Chinese translation. This skill should be used when the user asks to "translate to Chinese", "update the Chinese translation", "improve Chinese translation", "fix translation quality", "review Chinese translation", or when translating any English text into Chinese. Also applies when polishing an existing Chinese translation of English content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate traceability matrix and quality gate decision. Use when the user says "lets create traceability matrix" or "I want to analyze test coverage"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master Test Architect and Quality Advisor. Use when the user asks to talk to Murat or requests the Test Architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build one feature at a time. Complete each fully before moving to next. Auto-triggers quality check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。