「comparison」の検索結果

Maxim fashion editorial video — engineered for aspirational desire and status signaling via Aesthetic Resonance + Aspirational Self + Social Comparison Theory. Fashion films that trigger status-driven purchase behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze V8 heap snapshots to investigate memory leaks and retention issues. Use when given .heapsnapshot files, asked to compare before/after snapshots, asked to find what retains objects, or investigating why objects survive GC. Provides snapshot parsing, comparison, retainer-path helpers, and scratchpad scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Throwaway HTML mockups: 2-3 design variants to compare.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide for TUnit new-generation testing framework. Use when creating test projects with TUnit or migrating from xUnit to TUnit. Covers Source Generator driven test discovery, AOT compilation support, fluent async assertions. Includes project creation, [Test] attribute, lifecycle management, parallel control, and xUnit syntax comparison. Keywords: TUnit, tunit testing, source generator testing, AOT testing, new generation testing framework, [Test], [Arguments], TUnit.Assertions, Assert.That, Before(Test), After(Test), NotInParallel, TUnit.Templates, Microsoft.Testing.Platform, TUnit vs xUnit, parallel execution

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects typosquatting attacks in npm and PyPI package registries by analyzing package name similarity using Levenshtein distance and other string metrics, examining publish date heuristics to identify recently created packages mimicking established ones, and flagging download count anomalies where suspicious packages have disproportionately low usage compared to their legitimate targets. The analyst queries the PyPI JSON API and npm registry API to gather package metadata for automated comparison. Activates for requests involving package typosquatting detection, dependency confusion analysis, malicious package identification, or software supply chain threat hunting in package registries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a proposed redesign of a page on the current website as a self-contained static HTML file, then iterate via the impeccable craft loop. Per-page, idempotent, stale-aware. Use when the user asks for a redesign prototype, a before/after comparison, a design preview, a page mockup, a visual diff of the redesign, or invokes /stardust:prototype.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive dimension analysis and reporting for CJA. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze one or more dimensions — including cardinality, distribution/skew, trends, anomalies, data quality errors, comparisons, and forecasting. Also trigger when someone asks "what are the top values for...", "dimension health", "explore this dimension", "dimension dashboard", "dimension statistics", "data quality check on a dimension", "dimension cardinality", "dimension trends", "dimension skew", "dimension anomalies", "compare dimensions", or any similar request to understand what's inside a CJA dimension. Produces an interactive HTML dashboard or a markdown report. Works with the CJA MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines raw ideas through structured divergent and convergent thinking for ordinary non-command brainstorming, idea shaping, options comparison, and explicit IDEATE deepening routed by `aili-delivery-flow`; do not use as the top-level `/ideate` command owner or for existing-plan stress-test, review, or completion-claim checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep competitive intelligence for any market. Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals using real web data. Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix. Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape, analyze competitors, compare products in a market, or research who they're competing against. Triggers for "who are my competitors", "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "battle cards", "pricing comparison", "competitor pricing", "market players", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "who else is in this space", "competitive moat", or any request to profile, compare, or map competitors in a category. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements visual regression testing with screenshot comparison, diff detection, and CI integration using Playwright or Chromatic. Use when users request "visual testing", "screenshot testing", "UI regression", "visual diff", or "Chromatic setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building c...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript SDK for interacting with the SushiSwap Aggregator and related primitives. This SDK is a typed wrapper over the SushiSwap API, providing ergonomic helpers for token amounts, prices, quotes, and swap transaction generation. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - Building TypeScript or JavaScript applications - You want strongly typed token, amount, and fraction primitives - You need to request swap quotes or executable swap transactions via code - You want safer arithmetic, formatting, and comparisons without floating point errors - You prefer SDK-based integration over raw HTTP requests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates versioned permission requests against a grant scope and records comparison evidence. Activate on 'validate permissions', 'permission check', 'inheritance validation', 'permission matrix', 'security validation'. NOT for runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer) or isolation management (use dag-isolation-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze hierarchical DAG-like systems by separating undirected substrate from ordering metadata, then classifying diamonds, mixers, shortcuts, and hidden cycle structure. Use for workflow architecture, citation or genealogy DAG comparison, and information-flow diagnosis. NOT for ordinary cycle detection in arbitrary graphs, one-node runtime debugging, or systems with no real ordering constraint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks cumulative LLM costs across DAG execution and makes real-time decisions to stay within budget. Downgrades models, skips optional nodes, or stops early when cost exceeds thresholds. Use when managing execution budgets, analyzing cost breakdowns, or optimizing model routing for cost. Activate on "cost budget", "too expensive", "reduce cost", "cost optimization", "model downgrade", "budget exceeded". NOT for LLM model selection logic (use llm-router), pricing comparisons across providers, or billing/invoicing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, evaluate, and adopt agent infrastructure for a named workload. Use for agent runtime/framework selection, agent evaluation or observability plans, memory and tool boundaries, infrastructure cost controls, and organizational adoption. Covers workload-first comparison, risk and recovery planning, held-out evaluation, cost accounting, and staged rollout. Not a vendor ranking or a production certification. NOT for implementing a specific agent behavior (agentic-patterns), building a specific agent (ai-engineer), prompt optimization (prompt-engineer), or conventional ETL workflow design (jury_rig-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。