1,766 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate implementation code that passes existing unit tests. Use when the user provides test files (Python pytest/unittest, Java JUnit/TestNG) and asks Claude to implement the code to make those tests pass. Supports full TDD workflow - analyzing tests, generating implementation, running tests, debugging failures, and iterating until all tests pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument programs (Python, C/C++, Java) to capture snapshots of key program states at runtime, including variables, memory, and call stacks. Use when you need to debug complex issues, reproduce test cases, prepare traces for formal verification, or analyze program execution. Supports manual instrumentation points, automatic function/method instrumentation, and conditional triggers. Outputs structured JSON snapshots for debugging, replay, and verification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Locate root causes of failing regression tests by analyzing code changes, error messages, and test dependencies. Use when regression tests start failing after code changes, investigating test failures in CI/CD, debugging flaky tests, or understanding why previously passing tests now fail. Analyzes git diffs, stack traces, test output, and dependency changes to produce structured markdown reports ranking likely causes. Triggers when users ask to find why tests are failing, debug regression failures, investigate test breakage, or analyze failing test suites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains runtime errors and compilation failures with actionable debugging guidance. Use when Python or Java code throws runtime exceptions (NullPointerException, TypeError, AttributeError, etc.), compilation errors (syntax errors, type mismatches, import failures), or dependency issues. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and provide concrete fixes with examples. Distinct from test-related errors - focuses on errors during normal code execution and build processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically performs git bisect to identify the first bad commit that introduced a bug or failure. Use when debugging regressions, tracking down when a test started failing, or identifying which commit broke functionality. Handles flaky tests with retry logic and provides comprehensive reports with bisect logs and confidence levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains test failures and provides actionable debugging guidance. Use when tests fail (unit, integration, E2E), builds fail, or code throws errors. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and test output to identify root causes and suggest concrete fixes. Handles pytest, jest, junit, mocha, vitest, selenium, cypress, playwright, and other testing frameworks across Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, and other languages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selectively instruments code to capture runtime data for debugging failures and bugs. Use when investigating crashes, exceptions, unexpected behavior, test failures, or performance issues. Analyzes stack traces and error messages to identify suspicious code regions, then adds targeted logging, tracing, and assertions to capture variable values, execution paths, timing, and conditional branches. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, and C/C++.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically generate clear, actionable issue reports from failing tests and repository analysis. Analyze test failures to understand expected vs. actual behavior, identify affected code components, and produce well-structured Markdown reports suitable for GitHub Issues or similar trackers. Use when a test fails, when debugging issues, or when the user asks to create an issue report, generate a bug report, or document a test failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify the precise location of bugs in source code, modules, and systems. Use this skill when debugging applications, investigating test failures, analyzing error reports, tracing runtime issues, or performing root cause analysis. Analyzes stack traces, error messages, failing tests, and code patterns to pinpoint buggy functions, classes, files, or modules with confidence rankings and supporting evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate code fixes and patches from bug reports, failing test cases, error messages, and stack traces. Use this skill when debugging code, fixing test failures, addressing GitHub issues, resolving runtime errors, or patching security vulnerabilities. Analyzes the bug context, identifies root causes, and generates precise code patches with explanations and validation steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically instruments source code to collect runtime information such as function calls, branch decisions, variable values, and execution traces while preserving original program semantics. Use when users need to: (1) Add logging or tracing to code for debugging, (2) Collect runtime execution data for analysis, (3) Monitor function calls and control flow, (4) Track variable values during execution, (5) Generate execution traces for testing or profiling. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable instrumentation levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument code to support efficient git bisect by producing deterministic pass/fail signals and concise runtime summaries for each tested commit. Use when debugging regressions with git bisect, automating bisect workflows, creating bisect test scripts, handling flaky tests during bisection, or needing clear exit codes and logging for automated bisect runs. Helps identify the exact commit that introduced a bug through automated testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade TypeScript reference for React & Next.js frontend development. Covers type narrowing, component Props, generic hooks, discriminated unions, as const, satisfies, Zod validation, TanStack Query, server/client boundaries, forms, state management, performance, accessibility, debugging, and code review. Use when the user works with TypeScript in React or Next.js: type errors, Props design, generics, API typing, SSR/CSR boundaries, hydration issues, form validation, state management, performance, or code review. Also use for "how should I type this?", "why does this type error happen?", or any architectural decision involving TypeScript in a frontend context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, testing, or optimizing Python code that uses PyArrow arrays, schemas, Tables, RecordBatches, RecordBatchReaders, compute kernels, Dataset scans, Parquet, or Arrow IPC and C data interfaces. Trigger on schema drift, null/type semantics, chunking, batch streaming, predicate projection pushdown, conversion, and memory ownership. Do not use for pandas-only transformations, Polars-only expressions, generic SQL, Arrow Flight service design, C++/Rust Arrow, or Parquet work that does not use PyArrow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for creating, reviewing, or debugging GitHub Copilot reusable prompt files and slash commands in Visual Studio Code, including .github/prompts/*.prompt.md, inputs, context links, agent selection, and tool selection. Do not use for always-on rules, multi-step Agent Skills, custom personas, or VS Code extension commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or testing Pandera schemas and runtime validation for Polars DataFrame or LazyFrame pipelines installed with pandera[polars]. Trigger on pandera.polars DataFrameSchema, DataFrameModel, Column, Field, Check, PolarsData, decorators, coercion, strictness, lazy error collection, and validation-depth decisions. Do not use for pandas-backed Pandera, Pydantic object models, Polars transformations without Pandera, static dataframe typing alone, or generic data-quality platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade Python and AI engineering standards. Use for ANY Python work — FastAPI services, LangChain/LangGraph agents, RAG pipelines, LLM API integrations, document processing, or data scripts — whether writing new code, reviewing, refactoring, or debugging. Enforces typed Pydantic boundaries, structured errors and logging, LLM call timeouts/retries/output validation, secret management, async correctness, and tested code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered Claude Code skill that performs deep code review using formal logic and reasoning frameworks to detect bugs, anti-patterns, and security risks beyond what linters catch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。