「iter」の検索結果

Zig 0.16 idioms for Native SDK code, indexed by compile error. Load when `zig build` fails on std APIs with errors like "struct 'fs' has no member named 'cwd'", "struct 'array_list.Aligned(u8,null)' has no member named 'init'", "struct 'std' has no member named 'io'", "no member named 'GeneralPurposeAllocator'", "no member named 'getEnvMap'", or "invalid format string" - the signature of code written for Zig 0.15 or earlier. Covers main(std.process.Init), std.Io file IO and writers, ArrayList, process spawning, environment, clocks and sleep, sockets, custom formatting, and build.zig module shapes, each as this SDK writes them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workaround for write_file failures caused by special characters (apostrophes, backticks, template literals) using a Python heredoc script, plus a reliable TypeScript type-checking step that filters output to only the newly-written files to avoid being misled by pre-existing errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workaround for write_file failures caused by special characters (apostrophes, backticks, template literals) by using a Python heredoc script executed via shell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workaround for write_file failures caused by special characters (apostrophes, backticks, template literals) using a Python heredoc script, with mandatory post-write verification via read_file and cleanup of /tmp helper scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a file's first N lines and total line count in one shell call using head and wc -l with an echo separator, minimizing read operations and shell iterations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create structured medical SOAP notes by writing comprehensive content to a file in one iteration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or edit Excel workbooks with openpyxl-specific pitfall handling, anchored preflight audit, and deterministic post-write proof that every criterion is satisfied

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit Excel workbooks only after anchored preflight audit, then require deterministic Python/openpyxl post-write proof that every requested criterion is satisfied or explicitly reconciled before finalizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate spreadsheets, diagrams, and PDF reports with iteration budgeting and error recovery

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate spreadsheet, diagram, and PDF report as a cohesive deliverable set with iteration budgeting per component

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate spreadsheets, diagrams, and PDF reports in a phased workflow with explicit iteration budgets and error recovery

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured PDF checklists and reports with tables, sections, and scoring criteria using Python libraries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative workflow to verify PDF page counts and adjust layout parameters until requirements are met

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and classify agent failures occurring before execution starts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively debug Excel structure with exploratory scripts before writing extraction logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enrolls a project in OSS-Fuzz, Google's free continuous fuzzing service for open source, and drives it locally. Covers project.yaml, Dockerfile and build.sh setup, the helper scripts, reproducing OSS-Fuzz crash reports, and the acceptance criteria. Use when setting up continuous fuzzing for an open-source project, reproducing an OSS-Fuzz bug report, or testing an OSS-Fuzz build before submitting it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over any code target — a skill, plugin, module, or directory — using a reviewer the user names: any installed skill or agent. Keeps a cross-round findings ledger, escalates when fixes stop converging, and guards scope mechanically. Use when asked to 'improve this code until review passes', 'run an improvement loop with <reviewer>', or to iterate review-and-fix with a specific reviewer. For skills prefer the skill-improver entry; for a branch prefer pr-improver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create UI mockups at three fidelity levels — ASCII wireframes for quick iteration, standalone HTML mockups for delivery with requirements, and live prototypes for interaction testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design custom metric packs for plugin-eval so teams can add local evaluation rubrics that emit schema-compatible checks and metrics. Use when the user wants their own evaluation criteria or visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit compact EpiGraphDB API requests for ontology, literature, MR, gene-drug, and support-path evidence. Use when a user wants concise EpiGraphDB summaries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。