1,083 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Triage a single GitHub PR by PR number. Check out the PR's branch, detect conflicts with the target branch via `gh pr status` (and label the PR with `cc-resolve-conflict` if any are found), generate and evaluate a fix plan via create-review-fix-plan, then take action (add cc-fix-onetime label if fixes are needed, or merge the PR if it's ready).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, icons, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows, icons, icon stroke weight, icon states, motion restraint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore MPS-802 and 1526 serial dot matrix printer behavior in EMULATORS, including SerialPrinterMPS802 classes and their MatrixPrinterEmulation and SerialPrinterPeripheralSimulation hierarchy, IEC/KERNAL-trap printer routing, device numbers, secondary-address functions, PETSCII/character sets, 8x8 glyphs, enhanced width, reverse and paging modes, formatter strings, programmable characters, line/page geometry, PostScript output, and fidelity boundaries. Use when Codex reviews or edits COMMODORE MPS802 printer code, generated printer output, PostScript printer templates, C64/VIC-20/C264 serial-printer behavior, or compares implementation against .codex/docs/MPS802.pdf, the MPS-802 user guide, and 1526/MPS-802/4023 service information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore MPS-801 serial dot matrix printer behavior in EMULATORS, including SerialPrinterMPS801 classes and their MatrixPrinterEmulation and SerialPrinterPeripheralSimulation hierarchy, IEC/KERNAL-trap printer routing, device numbers, secondary addresses, PETSCII/character sets, 6x7 glyphs, double width, graphics mode, reverse field, tab and dot positioning, line/page geometry, PostScript output, and fidelity boundaries. Use when Codex reviews or edits COMMODORE MPS801 printer code, generated printer output, PostScript printer templates, C64/VIC-20/C264 serial-printer behavior, or compares implementation against .codex/docs/MPS801.pdf and historical MPS-801 sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore 1540/1541/1541C/1541-II compatible disk-drive behavior in EMULATORS, including IEC serial bus protocol, device numbers, KERNAL traps, CBM DOS commands/status, D64 image parsing, BAM/directory/file chains, PETSCII filenames, 6502 drive CPU/ROM/RAM expectations, 6522 VIA wiring, GCR/track/sector geometry, motor/head timing, and compatibility boundaries for 1541-like devices. Use when Codex reviews or edits C64, VIC-20, C264, COMMODORE disk, serial I/O, D64, CBM DOS, IEC, VIA, GCR, or 1541 drive code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton mental model for someone who has never seen this repo — what "layer" means (two different things), the two-halves rule, the three app.config registries, team-scoped multi-tenancy, manifest-driven field types, the numbered invariants with the incidents behind them, and the known-weak points. Use when orienting in this codebase for the first time, when a question is shaped like "how does crouton work / why is it built this way / where does X live", when deciding whether a change belongs in a package or a generated layer, when confused by an extends chain or by croutonApps/croutonCollections/croutonLayoutBlocks, or before proposing any structural change. Trigger phrases: "what is a crouton layer", "package vs generated layer", "how does multi-tenancy work here", "why is there a stub component", "where do field types come from", "what invariants must hold".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process the batch of incoming Bridge Classroom feedback. Pull open `classroom-feedback` issues from the PBS repo, cluster them by defect class, verify each against the actual board, and fix at the right altitude — patch a single board, or (when a class recurs) build a gate, sweep the whole corpus, and regenerate/drop collectively. Engine bugs route to the Classroom repo; bridge-judgment calls go to Rick. Nothing leaves the machine without David's OK. Invoke as `/issue` (optionally with an issue number or scenario to restrict the run).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ADHD-friendly output shaping for subagent responses. Lead with the next action, number multi-step tasks, end with one concrete next step, suppress tangents, restate state across turns, give specific time estimates, make wins visible, matter-of-fact errors, cap visible lists to 5, no preamble or closers. Loaded by genin, jonin, anbu, tokubetsu-jonin, and chunin when shaping final responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a feature branch with sequential or timestamp numbering
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or change immutable business values with meaningful invariants, equality, or behavior, such as order numbers and money. Use when primitive values obscure domain rules; avoid wrapping every scalar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judge performance or resource claims on real hardware: benchmark design or review, latency, throughput, memory or headroom numbers, and accept-or-reject decisions on optimizations. Not for refactors with no resource claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Save the latest learning as a numbered markdown file under ~/.claude/learnings and update the learnings index with title and tags. Use when the user says "save", asks to record a learning, or wants the current insight stored for later.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, archive, export, upload, and manage Xcode version/build numbers with the current asc xcode helpers before App Store Connect upload or submission. Use when creating an IPA or PKG for upload.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever several decisions are pending or have accumulated -- whether within a topic, project, document, or over the course of a session: inventory them, present a numbered briefing with options A/B/C/D and a marked recommendation, accept letter answers (including batches), record the results, and write them back into the source documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages your own skill landscape: surveys and compares existing skills (Audit mode), researches the web for new skills/plugins (Explore mode), and is at the same time the installer that generates lean subskills (Skill-Finder, family umbrella, maintenance skills) instead of loading a monolith. Use this skill for "compare/audit skills", "which skills are duplicated", "form skill families", "clean up/consolidate skills", "maintain the skill register", "find skills/plugins for topic X", "install new skills", "browse the skill marketplace", or for `/skill-explorer`. Delivers a sub-report per family and a globally numbered decision list; installs/uninstalls only after a security check and explicit approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews the text and structure of a document, slide deck or web page against the accessibility rules the user supplies, or a default set covering heading structure, image alternative text, colour used as the only cue, link text, reading order, tables and language, and returns numbered findings with location, rule, severity and a ready-to-apply fix for the author, plus proposed alt text and a list of checks that need a tool or a person. Use when the user asks to "check this document for accessibility", "review the alt text in this deck", "is this page accessible", "run an accessibility check on these slides", "find accessibility issues before I publish" or "check my headings and link text". Do not use for brand or template compliance of slides, use branded-deck-builder instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares the trend update for a recurring emailed report: identifies report emails not yet processed, extracts the configured metrics from their spreadsheet, CSV or PDF attachments, returns new rows for an append-only trends sheet and writes a DRAFT summary with period-on-period deltas and flagged anomalies. Use when the user asks to "update the trends for the weekly report", "analyse the latest monthly report", "what changed in the latest report", "do the latest numbers look unusual" or "set up tracking for a report that arrives by email". Do not use for a single file with no trend state, use dataset-insight-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarises one sprint from the board export, sprint report and review or stand-up notes the user provides into a one-page DRAFT sprint review summary: the sprint goal as written, items delivered, items not delivered with the reasons the sources state, carry-over, impediments, metrics exactly as given, and numbered questions for the retrospective, every row referenced to a work item or note fragment and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "summarise the sprint", "write the sprint review", "what did we deliver this sprint", "list the carry-over and blockers" or "draft the sprint recap". Do not use for the retrospective write-up or themed lessons across several sprints, use lessons-learned-synthesis instead; for a weekly project status report, use project-status-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds an evidence map for one document, section or contested claim: every factual claim extracted verbatim and numbered, its supporting passage in the supplied sources or UNKNOWN, the strength of that support as evidenced, contradictions between sources, and the specific question or document that would close each gap, returned in the chat as Markdown tables for the author or reviewer. Use when the user asks to "check what this document actually proves", "map the evidence behind these claims", "which of these statements are supported", "build an evidence map", "what would we need to back this up" or "is this claim substantiated". Do not use for requesting evidence of security controls from control owners, use control-evidence-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns an engineer's notes, a ticket history or a chat thread into a draft step-by-step runbook with preconditions, stop conditions, numbered steps with checks, verification, rollback and escalation, for the team to validate before use. Commands verbatim, placeholders marked, every gap UNKNOWN; never executes a step or fills a gap from general knowledge. Use when the user asks to "write a runbook from these notes", "turn this resolved ticket into a runbook", "document the steps we ran" or "check this runbook for gaps". Do not use for a business process without commands, use sop-drafter instead; for a knowledge article or known-error record, use knowledge-article-drafter; for the post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。