4,758 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user asks to inspect Sentry issues or events, summarize recent production errors, or pull basic Sentry health data via the Sentry CLI; perform read-only queries using the `sentry` command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help the user define a concrete, measurable goal before starting work, especially when they ask to use the goal tool, create a goal, set an objective, clarify success criteria, or turn a fuzzy intention into a quantitative outcome. Use this skill for goal creation and goal refinement only; it does not manage durable snapshots, decision logs, or long-running execution artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide the user through an independent iFixAi audit of their own agent, checking whether it does the job it is supposed to do given their business rules and org structure. Prefer pointing it at the user's REAL deployed agent over its HTTP endpoint (its actual tools, retrieval, and governance) with `--provider http --endpoint <url>`; only when no endpoint is reachable, fall back to replicating the model beneath as a bare stand-in (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Azure, Bedrock, etc.). Graded by the judge(s) of their choice (the same model, one independent judge, or a cross-vendor panel). You are the operator who walks them through it and explains the scorecard, running the SAME `ifixai run` engine as the guided CLI. Use when the user asks to run iFixAi or to audit an agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; Kiro skill instructions and steering state read selected project planning context. Recovery reads project planning files and their timestamps only, not agent transcript stores. This adapter registers no Stop hook, never requests continuation, and never runs commands declared in Markdown. The skill has no network upload path. Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the DBX CLI to inspect DBX-managed database connections, explore schemas, run bounded read-only queries, generate DBML or schema documentation, and open tables in DBX Desktop. Use when the user asks to work with a database configured in DBX from a shell-capable AI agent. Never enable writes unless the user explicitly approves the exact operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Posts content and articles to X (Twitter). Supports regular posts with images/videos and X Articles (long-form Markdown). In Codex, honor explicit requests for the Codex Chrome plugin/@chrome by using the Chrome Extension workflow; otherwise use Chrome Computer Use when available and fall back to real Chrome CDP scripts only when allowed. Use when user asks to "post to X", "tweet", "publish to Twitter", or "share on X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Babysits an open GitHub PR until merge-ready. Use when asked to watch a PR over time — not for one-shot comment resolution or one CI failure. GitHub (incl. Enterprise) only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commit, push, and open a PR. Use when asked to ship/open a PR, or for PR-description-only flows like writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from a plan document, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs. Use when an outer orchestrator needs implementation and local verification only, without the shipping tail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take a request all the way to done, hands-off, through the right Compound Engineering skills. A code change ends as an open pull request, pushed without stopping. Use only when the user explicitly asks for autonomous end-to-end work or invokes lfg directly. Use ce-plan, ce-work, ce-debug, or ce-commit-push-pr for work the user reviews step by step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hands-off, diff-scoped browser QA of the active branch: maps user flows, drives a real browser, autonomously fixes small breakages with regression tests and commits, judges experience against product personas, and writes a durable dogfood report. Manual invocation only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or scope what to build. Not for executing already-specified work. Use ce-pov for a verdict on adopting a named external technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open or update a pull request on pascalorg/editor from the current branch, describing only what the branch actually did. Use when the user asks to open/create a PR, push and PR, or ship a branch in the editor repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean and finalize authorized natural-language text intended for readers by auditing suspicious invisible Unicode and rewriting prose while preserving facts, meaning, and the writer's voice. Use when the user asks to clean, humanize, polish, or finalize articles, manuscripts, reports, documentation, emails, product copy, UI text, Markdown, or HTML prose, or when a project rule or instruction file explicitly requires this workflow. Don't use for code-only tasks or undisclosed authorship evasion; leave code, commands, identifiers, paths, APIs, formulas, citations, required disclosures, and verbatim quotations unchanged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Warn when user-facing UI changes drift from DESIGN.md. Advisory only; findings never gate Warden clearance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flag only new security issues introduced by this diff. Reported in the Warden security summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flag concrete false-positive proof introduced by changed specs, not test helper or channel preferences. Advisory only; never gates Warden clearance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flag desktop<->den contract drift introduced by this diff. High findings gate Warden clearance; medium findings are advisory only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoke whenever writing, changing, reviewing, or sweeping Vitest tests in this repo. Authoring gate for new or changed tests, plus an audit workflow for low-value, implementation-coupled, or duplicative tests and the test-only production seams they keep alive. Use when asked to add tests, review tests, clean up tests, or when a PR touches *.test.ts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the questions people ask about a market, how ChatGPT answers them, and which sites get cited in the answers. Use when the user asks what people ask AI about their niche, wants prompt ideas, or wants to know where their brand is missing before choosing prompts to track. Research only; it never saves tracking or starts answer collection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。