「porting」の検索結果

Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the 5-stage Funnel workflow (Notes → Leads → Primitives → Findings → Reports) for structured bug bounty hunting. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this agent when you need to extract and summarize key findings from scientific references that are relevant to a gene's function. This agent should be used after references have been identified in a gene review to provide detailed supporting evidence from the literature. The agent will look up cached publications and extract only the most relevant findings related to the gene's direct function, excluding irrelevant experimental details unless they directly inform gene function.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frappe Insights and analytics guidance for dashboards, query design, charts, permissions, metrics, ERPNext reporting, and operational analytics. Use when work touches Frappe Insights or analytics in the Frappe ecosystem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-read pinned on-chain facts and watch documentary source fingerprints behind failure scenarios monthly, reporting drift without approving or changing scenario records automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical entry point for the full Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Invoke as /evidence-verification-pipeline or /ev-pipeline — both names trigger this skill. Use whenever you need to run the evidence phases end-to-end: collecting raw evidence from the data lake, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, running adversarial auditing for noise and URL errors, and checking link health via Firecrawl. Also use when someone says "run the evidence pipeline", "verify the evidence lake", "audit evidence", "run ev-pipeline", "full evidence check", "pipeline run", "prepare evidence for ingestion", or "refresh the data lake". This is the pre-ingestion step — run it before importing any evidence into the registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write flux commentary for P&L and balance-sheet lines over threshold, comparing current period against prior period and budget with drivers explained from underlying activity. Use for month-end close packages and management reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visual design verification loop for matching a goal PNG to a live render. Use when the user shares a design mock / goal image and asks to match the UI to it, asks to "iterate on this design" or "match this 1:1", or calls out visual drift in a previous UI iteration. Provides histogram color sampling, shape inspection (radius/border/shadow/bg-mode/fill-vs-context), computed-style checking on the live render, snap, and side-by-side diff. After every UI change the assistant MUST snap the live render and Read the snap with the Read tool before reporting the change done — skipping that is the

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a clear, actionable malware analysis report covering summary, sample identity, capabilities, IOCs, ATT&CK mapping, and detection guidance for both technical and decision-making audiences. Activates for requests to write, structure, or review a malware analysis or reverse-engineering report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates detection coverage by mapping Atomic Red Team tests to ATT&CK techniques, checking which of your detections cover each tested technique, and reporting coverage gaps. Activates for requests to validate detections with atomic tests, map Atomic Red Team to coverage, or find detection gaps against tested techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares indicators of compromise for safe sharing: defanging URLs, domains, IPs, and emails so they cannot be accidentally clicked or resolved, and formatting them into STIX/CSV/MISP-friendly output. Activates for requests to defang IOCs, sanitize indicators for a report, or export indicators for sharing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a plugin/demo repo's screenshots in sync with its UX. When editor / UI / design-token code changes in an opted-in repo (one carrying .pulp/screenshots.toml), re-capture and refresh every place each shot is consumed — README images, web-demo Open Graph (og.png) images, and gallery thumbnails — consistently across the WAM and WCLAP demo sites. Two capture routes: native headless (render_to_png / pulp-screenshot, Skia) for README / native-editor shots, and live-web headless Chrome (playwright-core) for WAM/WCLAP demo OG + gallery images. Backfills demos missing OG images. This is a PORTING / consistency tool — it re-shoots a repo's OWN UI, it never clones another product's art.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leveraged-prototype dev loop (`pulp loop`) — focus marker plus normal watch/rebuild loop, with AOT analyzer guidance and deferred ar-swap/PR-monitor playbook. Use when porting an existing UI/bundle to Pulp, doing visual/behavioral parity work, or batching upstream framework gap fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing frontend build failures, runtime errors, UI anomalies, API/data problems, white screens, request failures, or unexplained production exceptions; Chinese triggers include debugging, debug, troubleshooting, positioning, error reporting, exceptions, white screens, request failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate OpenClaw release candidates through OCM using the built OpenClaw artifact, a broad reusable scenario matrix, copied existing-user state, clean new-user state, concise pass/fail reporting, and focused failure notes. Use when asked to test OpenClaw origin/main, release readiness, upgrade behavior, plugins, services, channels, doctor recovery, packaging, or broad release risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use OpenClaw Manager (OCM) safely and correctly for OpenClaw environment lifecycle work, runtime installation/builds, release-shaped local builds, upgrades, migration/adoption, cloning existing user state, service supervision, gateway logs, dev worktrees, plugin testing, model/provider smoke tests, TUI/dashboard checks, cleanup, and concise reporting. Use whenever Codex is asked to use OCM, manage OpenClaw envs/runtimes/services, test OpenClaw with OCM, reproduce existing-user or new-user flows, or avoid breaking user state while working with OpenClaw.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a cytotechnologist — screening a gynecologic (Pap test) slide and applying Bethesda System criteria, assessing non-gynecologic specimen adequacy (FNA rapid on-site evaluation, body fluid, brushing) against the relevant reporting system, deciding whether a finding can be signed out independently or must be referred to a pathologist, or auditing screening quality metrics (ASC:SIL ratio, rescreen concordance, workload compliance). A reasoning aid, not a substitute for a certified cytotechnologist or pathologist signing out an actual case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compliance Manager — sizing and defending a compliance program's headcount/budget, deciding build-vs-buy on monitoring or case-management technology, choosing a centralized-vs-embedded staffing model, translating a new regulatory obligation into a costed resourcing ask, or reporting program coverage to executives/the board.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Data Officer — resolving conflicting metric definitions across dashboards, deciding whether a dataset should be retained or purged, assigning data ownership for a system feeding regulatory or board reporting, sizing a privacy/breach risk against a proposed data collection, or auditing data readiness before an AI/ML initiative kicks off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate publication-ready methods sections, figure legends, supplementary tables, and data availability statements from ENCODE analysis provenance. Implements the scientific documentation standards requiring complete metadata reporting. Use when the user needs to write methods, generate figure legends, create supplementary tables, draft data availability statements, compile tool citations, or auto-generate any publication text from their ENCODE analysis. Trigger on: methods section, figure legend, supplementary table, data availability, tool citations, publication writing, manuscript, write methods, methods draft, write up, write-up, paper writing, reproducible methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for Tauri v2 os-info plugin with safe system diagnostics and reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。