「reviews」の検索結果

Personal GTD (Getting Things Done) coach that helps users achieve their annual goals. Use when users mention goals, plans, daily tasks, productivity, time management, task tracking, reviews, or need help breaking down objectives into actionable steps. Automatically remembers user's goals and progress across conversations. Supports multiple languages. 新手引导：输入 `/gtd 新手`、「这个怎么用」「第一次用」「能干嘛」时，走 SKILL.md 的〈新手上路〉，不要直接开始干活。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and reviews Swift App Intents code that exposes app actions and data to Siri, Shortcuts, Spotlight, widgets, Control Center, and Apple Intelligence. Use when adding AppIntent, AppEntity, OpenIntent, AppShortcutsProvider, EntityQuery, Focus Filters, AssistantEntity/AssistantIntent schemas, on-screen awareness, LongRunningIntent/CancellableIntent, EntityCollection, SyncableEntity, AppIntentsTesting, or when wiring SwiftData/networked data into intents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to write, rewrite, review, or critique commercial copy meant to drive a reader toward action — landing pages, hero sections, headlines, email (cold outreach, nurture, promo, launch), CTAs, microcopy, product descriptions, value propositions, ads, or taglines. Also for copy audits, clarity checks, conversion reviews, or choosing a framework (AIDA, PAS, BAB, FAB, 4U's). Applies even when the user just says "write me an email" or "review this page." Not for channel/budget strategy (use channel-expert) or pricing structure (use pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform capacity planning using historical metrics and growth models. Use predict_linear for forecasting, identify resource constraints, calculate headroom, and recommend scaling actions before saturation. Use before seasonal traffic spikes or product launches, during quarterly capacity reviews, when resource utilization trends upward, or before budget planning cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured cross-project code review between two Claude Code instances via the cross-review-mcp broker. Each agent reads its own codebase, reviews the peer's code, and engages in evidence-backed dialogue — with QSG scaling laws enforcing review quality through minimum bandwidth constraints and phase-gated progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a GxP audit of computerized systems and processes. Covers audit planning, opening meetings, evidence collection, finding classification (critical/major/minor), CAPA generation, closing meetings, report writing, and follow-up verification. Use for scheduled internal audits, supplier qualification audits, pre-inspection readiness assessments, for-cause audits triggered by deviations or data integrity concerns, or periodic compliance posture reviews of validated systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit project dependencies for version staleness, security vulnerabilities, and compatibility issues. Covers lock file analysis, upgrade path planning, and breaking change assessment. Use before a release to ensure dependencies are current and secure, during periodic maintenance reviews, after receiving a security advisory, when upgrading to a new language version, before submitting to CRAN or npm, or when inheriting a project to assess its dependency health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-platform review aggregation and thematic analysis for any business

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate personalized, empathetic review responses for negative, neutral, and positive reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Alternate /pr-review and /pr-address on a PR until the PR is truly mergeable — no new review findings, zero unresolved inline threads, zero unaddressed top-level reviews or issue comments, all CI checks green, and two consecutive quiet polls after CI settles. Use when the user wants a PR polished to merge-ready without setting a fixed number of rounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure the active Agent model with pinned offline ModelTrace sampling and return an unsigned closed-set attribution record. Use before Agent-originated commits, Issue/PR creation or material updates, comments, reviews, and current collaboration writes in either execution mode. Do not treat a fingerprint, declared model label, or record reference as authenticated identity, permission, independent review, or acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews PRs that modify the Feature Table in CLAUDE.md. Use when a PR adds CC version rows or modifies docs/CLAUDE-feature-table.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research powered by Exa. Use for lead generation, literature reviews, deep dives, competitive analysis, or any query where one search falls short, including phrases like 'research this', 'find everything about', 'find me all', or 'deep dive on'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any multi-step work with a stated goal — a feature, a bugfix spanning multiple files, a QA sweep, a doc draft + iterations, a multi-day investigation — create an ATO Mission instead of doing it via bare `ato dispatch` calls. A Mission persists the goal + the verifiable success criteria, lets the coordinator tick drive the work across days, captures every event in a structured audit trail (SQLite + markdown narrative), and integrates parallel agents' work via merge strategies. Complement to `ato-warroom` (the cross-family decision before you start) and `ato-review` (the post-code-diff review). Missions is where multi-step work LIVES; war-rooms are where decisions ABOUT it get made; reviews are where the resulting commits get vetted. Fires when: the work has more than one decision point, a verifiable end state, or runs across more than one session. Use it for any ATO development that doesn't fit in a single dispatch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access the Anthropic product named Claude Design when the request contains that exact name, a claude.ai/design URL, or a .dc.html file. Also use for standalone-to-artifact migration and Claude Design artifact links. Use for projects, files, design systems, previews, conversations, comments, sharing, and code-to-design or design-to-code synchronization; otherwise stay inactive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Food photography audit — reviews existing photos, identifies missing item photos, provides specific shot list with angles, lighting, and styling direction

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactoring pipeline: analyzes a target file or directory for code quality issues, plans safe incremental improvements, optionally writes tests first as a safety net, implements the changes, and reviews the result. Orchestrates refactor-planner → (test-writer) → parallel-task-orchestrator → code-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug pipeline: investigates a bug, diagnoses root cause, writes failing tests, implements fix via TDD, and reviews the result. Orchestrates bug-investigator -> bug-fixer -> code-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation (or, when explicitly requested, research) to GPT-6.1 Sol (high reasoning; xhigh on request) via Codex CLI. Claude plans, orchestrates, and reviews; Sol writes the code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code for quality and security issues. Combines code quality review with security vulnerability detection. Use when reviewing code after generation in Construction Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。