1,627 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Erstellt aus Geschäftsmodell, Altbedingungen, Preislisten und Beschwerden vollständige passende AGB samt Einführungstexten. Steuert zehn Fachskills gezielt, fragt entscheidende Lücken nach und prüft aktuelle Normen und Rechtsprechung.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Verhandlungs Playbook AGB: entwickelt Ziel, Vergleich und Eskalation; Ergebnis: Verhandlungs- oder Eskalationslinie.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Excel: Dokumentenmatrix, Lückenliste und Nachforderung: ordnet Akte, Belege und Lücken; Ergebnis: Dokumentenmatrix mit Nachforderungsliste.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Fähige: Risikoampel, Gegenargumente und Verteidigungslinien: prüft Ergebnis, Beweislast und Gegenposition; Ergebnis: Fristen- und Risikoampel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prüft, ob Kunden Auslöser, Belastungen und Rechtsfolgen einer AGB-Klausel verstehen können. Für unklare Begriffe, Preislisten und Verweisketten; liefert begründete Beanstandung und verständliche Ersatzfassung.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Klauselvarianten Vergleich: entwickelt Ziel, Vergleich und Eskalation; Ergebnis: Verhandlungs- oder Eskalationslinie.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial visual-layout audit of a Quarto `.qmd` or Beamer `.tex` deck. Flags overflow, font inconsistency, box fatigue, spacing, and alignment issues. Use when user says "visual audit", "check the layout", "does this overflow?", "look for visual issues", "audit the slides", or after reworking a deck's appearance. Does NOT check writing or pedagogy — pair with `/proofread` or `/pedagogy-review`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation. Use when user says "devil's advocate", "poke holes in this deck", "push back on my slides", "stress-test the design", "what would a skeptical student ask?". Read-only; surfaces questions to force rethinking. Lighter than `/pedagogy-review`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a co-author / collaborator handoff brief for a multi-author, multi-machine project — summarizing what changed since the last brief (git delta), the current state of each artifact (manuscript, analysis, slides), open questions, how to reproduce locally, and any restricted-data access steps. Use when user says "coauthor brief", "handoff brief", "bring my coauthor up to speed", "what changed since last week", "onboard a collaborator", "write a handoff for [name]", or before sending a co-author the repo. NOT a commit or a checkpoint — it is the cross-machine, cross-person summary `meta-governance.md` only partially covers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn student course evaluations (free-text + numeric) into an actionable teaching-improvement plan — the teaching analogue of /respond-to-referees. Clusters comments into themes, separates signal from noise, classifies each theme Keep / Change / Investigate / Out-of-scope, and drafts concrete changes mapped to the syllabus and slide decks. Use when user says "respond to my evals", "what do these course evaluations tell me", "turn my teaching feedback into a plan", or after a semester's evals arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Motion-first AI video director for topic-to-video creation. Use when the user gives a theme, idea, article, script, or brief and wants AI to freely create a real animated video instead of a PPT/slideshow-style explainer; when deciding visual metaphors, motion grammar, scene beats, component choices, generated image needs, HyperFrames/Remotion implementation strategy, and anti-PPT QC.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a Jev-powered decision and release gate after an office assistant generates a report, proposal, spreadsheet, document, or slide deck. Use for claim-to-evidence checks, narrow requirement decisions, risk triage, and human-review routing; do not use it to generate the deliverable or claim that Jev browsed or verified a URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PowerPoint slide deck generation and management using python-pptx with YAML-driven content and styling
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture VS Code screenshots and self-contained browser animation scenes through Playwright. Use for editor evidence, slide imagery, or silent WebM scene clips.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a playable prototype in about an hour to answer one question — is it fun? — with greybox primitives, a hard timebox, and explicit keep/kill criteria. Use when prototyping a mechanic, making a vertical slice or MVP, greyboxing/blockout, or judging throwaway vs keep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /develop to build a feature, UI or backend, from an approved design, a page, component, API, service, or data slice. If something load bearing is undecided and no spec records it, it stops and routes you to /architect; otherwise it reads the spec plus AGENTS.md, builds, and advances the scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /scope to turn a product idea into a living, coarse scope in docs/scope/ and keep it current: plan a new product, plan the next slice, enroll one named feature, or run with no argument to reconcile after shipping and queue what is next. Seeds WHAT to build; /architect designs, /develop builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes Claude Code: plugin/Skill repair, marketplace, statusline, model profiles/source sync, 1M/[1m] context, usage/quota reset ping, memory→docs, .txt repair, turning auto memory off. Reads one bundled specialist; history, hooks, and Lark keep their own entries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes docs: Word/PDF/PPTX/saved HTML→Markdown; MD/Word→PDF; create Word; PDF HTML/translate; Excel/xlsm/macOS; photo/signed scans; Mermaid; DOCX review; post-change docs. Reads one bundled Daymade specialist. New slide decks use deck-creator when installed; generic PDF reading/editing and spreadsheet analysis stay with their own Skills. Retired ppt-creator stays manual-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits already-rendered UI and Markdown/Obsidian image layout — web app, deck/slide, dashboard, design-system, or Electron/native app — via real-browser/native-app journeys and a Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find typography, overflow, responsive, routing, data-viz, browser-output, or native-shell defects, or to compare a render against a reference. Not for greenfield UI design (use ui-designer) or QA-program setup (use qa-expert).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 帮我写家长会发言稿, 家长会PPT大纲, 班主任家长会讲话, 期中家长会, 新生家长会, 毕业班家长会, or prepare a parent meeting as a Chinese teacher. Produces a parent-meeting pack in Chinese: an agenda, a timed speech for the 班主任 or subject teacher with class data presented without ranking individual students, a slide outline, specific requests to parents, a one-page handout, answers to likely questions, and a follow-up message for the parents' WeChat group.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write calm, businesslike co-parenting messages that keep the focus on the kids and stay out of the old conflict — for scheduling, expenses, decisions, and hard topics. Use when asked to write a message to my co-parent, respond to my ex about the kids, co-parenting communication help, or how to reply without a fight. Produces a message drafted in a neutral, child-centered tone (the 'BIFF'-style brief/informative/friendly/firm approach), the bait removed, a clear ask or answer, and a note on documentation — steering away from anything that escalates. Not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep citations honest in business documents — every load-bearing claim sourced, links that actually contain the claim, the as-of dates that keep numbers honest, and the internal-vs-external sourcing rules for decks and memos. Use when asked check the sourcing in this deck, add citations to this doc, our slide says 'studies show' — which studies, or set citation norms for the team. Produces the claim-by-claim audit, the fixes (source found, claim softened, or cut), the citation format for the venue, and the team norm card.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。