「verify」の検索結果

Use when a test fails and you need to diagnose the root cause. Run the test, read errors, trace through generated and source code, fix, and verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove that the file you are about to send, publish, or hand off IS the thing you mean — before it leaves your hands. Rebuild from source, check integrity, diff the derived artifact against its source, and require the recipient to echo what they received. Use before sending a paper/PDF for review, shipping a release or replication package, handing files to a coauthor or collaborator, uploading anything to an external reviewer or model, or publishing. Prevents an entire review/QA cycle from being spent on defects that exist only in the artifact, not in the work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live Borg debugging by exec-ing into the borg-web-ui Docker container. Use when debugging borg commands, writing tests against real borg output, developing borg 2.0 features, or verifying borg behavior before writing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Worktree setup and resume guidance for isolated feature work. Use when starting, resuming, switching, or verifying a feature branch/worktree for lifecycle, debugging, implementation, review, or multi-agent workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Implementation phase guidance for executing feature plans and checking implementation against design. Use when the user wants to implement planned tasks, update implementation docs, verify code matches design, or run dev-lifecycle phases 5 and 7.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Supervise multi-agent workflows over repeated passes: poll progress, unblock waiting agents, coordinate dependencies, relay outputs, resolve conflicts, and verify completion. Use only for ongoing multi-agent coordination, not one-off list/detail/send/start/kill actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, recreate, align, and verify reference-video motion. Use when the user asks to recreate, copy, match, align, pixel-align, or compare a video; when a HyperFrames or Remotion remake is judged not aligned; when fixed reference playback and reusable motion components must be separated; or when delivery needs full-frame runtime, render, decode, boundary, timing, and archive evidence instead of sampled screenshots alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Gluten ANSI-mode test results (run dev/verify-ansi-expressions.sh, parse JSON tracker output, produce root-cause analysis and fix recommendations). Trigger on user requests like "analyze ANSI tests", "run ANSI matrix", "why is this ANSI test failing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying that a generated agent package can be installed, discovered by runtimes, and checked without private dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract factual claims from PR copy, verify each claim independently, attach concrete citations, and warn when certainty is low. Runs each claim through proven newsroom verification methods (lateral reading, source-tier climbing, provenance pillars, triangulation, calibrated rating) and puts the burden of proof on the speaker. Use before a pitch, press release, reactive comment, DM, or other journalist-facing draft is trusted or sent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided first-time setup for Minutes — download whisper model, create directories, configure audio input. Use when the user says "set up minutes", "install minutes", "first time setup", "configure minutes", "get started with minutes", "how do I start using minutes", or when verify shows missing components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modify living Roblox Studio projects safely: inspect Explorer and execution locations, preserve existing structure, reuse modules/remotes, create meaningful Instances, apply Attributes and CollectionService tags, test server/client and multiple devices, inspect Output, and remove experiments/debug objects. Use when an agent edits a place or rbxl/rbxlx/Rojo project, operates in Studio, adds Scripts/LocalScripts/ModuleScripts, or must verify a Roblox change in context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calibrate an LLM judge against human labels using data splits, TPR/TNR, and bias correction. Use after writing a judge prompt (write-judge-prompt) when you need to verify alignment before trusting its outputs. Do NOT use for code-based evaluators (those are deterministic; test with unit tests per `write-code-eval`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridges Claude Code and Codex sessions when native tools can't reach the target. Use for 跨产品通信 / 脚本回帖 / 送达排查: cross-product messages, hooks or scripts posting to a session, verifying delivery (Held messages included), shared-work ownership, or an inbound peer assertion. Not for same-product or parent/subagent messaging (use native tools), spawning agents, moving full history, or cross-machine pairing (deprecated).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and verify new React-library ports or copied/rewritten React surfaces in Octane bindings from npm names or npm/GitHub links/lists. Enforces immutable provenance, license boundaries, dependency ordering, full-surface parity, and machine evidence. Existing-binding audits and maintenance start with update-bindings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode a care-home contract before a parent moves in — the fee-escalation clause with no cap, the needs-can-no-longer-be-met eviction trigger, the guarantor line that quietly makes you personally liable, and the after-death charges nobody mentions on the tour. Use when asked to review a care-home or nursing-home contract, what does this admission agreement mean, can they raise the fees, or can they make my parent leave. Produces a clause-by-clause decode ranked by financial and eviction risk, the questions to put in writing before signing, and the negotiate-or-verify list. Pairs with long-term-care-options for choosing the home; this is for the contract. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Negotiate a car purchase without getting played — know the real target price, handle the dealership tactics, and keep the financing and add-ons from eating your savings. Use when asked to help me negotiate a car, buy a car without getting ripped off, what should I pay for this car, or dealership negotiation tips. Produces a target-price approach (research the out-the-door price), the dealer tactics to expect and counters, guidance on separating price/trade/financing, the add-ons to decline, and a walk-away plan — flagging to verify current pricing and rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the beneficiary designations that quietly override wills — the account-by-account sweep, the life-event triggers that make them stale, and the coordination check against actual intentions. Use when asked check my beneficiaries, does my 401k go to my ex, do beneficiary forms beat a will, or what should I update after marriage/divorce/a birth. Produces the account sweep list, the stale-designation red flags, the intent-vs-paperwork comparison table, and the update checklist with the verify-in-writing step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut through the model soup to buy the right appliance — the features that actually matter for you, the ones that are marketing, and when to buy. Use when asked which [fridge/washer/dishwasher] should I buy, help me choose an appliance, what features do I need, or is this appliance worth it. Produces a needs-based feature shortlist (must-have vs nice-to-have vs marketing fluff), fit and capacity checks, reliability and running-cost considerations, warranty/extended-warranty guidance, and timing tips — flagging to verify current models, prices, and specs before buying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a trip that actually works with a disability or access need — confirm real accessibility (not just 'accessible' labels), book the assistance in advance, plan for equipment and medication, and build in the contingencies for when access breaks down. Use when someone says 'plan an accessible trip', 'travelling with a wheelchair/disability', 'book assistance for my flight', or 'will this hotel actually work for me'. Produces an access-verified itinerary, an assistance-booking checklist, an equipment/medication plan, and contingency scripts. Verify specifics with providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。