Index of trusted GJC SDK reference guides (broker, session CLI, embedding, app development). Advisory only: read these documents for background; there is no guide to execute and no workflow skill to run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
176 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Index of trusted GJC SDK reference guides (broker, session CLI, embedding, app development). Advisory only: read these documents for background; there is no guide to execute and no workflow skill to run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate GJC SDK sessions from the CLI (`gjc sdk session list|inspect|send|status|tail|close|raw` plus the explicit raw control|query|global hatch). Advisory reference: broker-bound, credential-free output; mutating verbs run only when explicitly invoked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AWS security service suitability, coverage and cost recommendations: WAF/origin overlap, AWS Network Firewall inspection coverage and policy review, VPC endpoint, Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN segmentation and DNS Firewall security-control suitability, certificate renewal ownership and monitoring, incident response triage ownership, centralized security log store (CloudWatch or Security Lake). Also factual configuration, findings, data sources and severity scoring for GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub V2/OCSF (Exposure, connectors, automation), Security Hub CSPM/ASFF (standards, controls), Macie, Detective, Security Lake, AWS Security Incident Response membership and case coverage, and Organizations security policies. Applies to advisory security-service choices even when one service is named. Implementation, rule or code authoring, deployment, scans and troubleshooting outside these factual procedures belong to specialist skills. Supports local AWS CLI and AWS MCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes advisory editorial style diagnostics (sentence-length variation, configured phrase lists, vocabulary sampling) that never infer authorship or affect scoring. Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project orchestrator for the screenwriting skill set (剧本项目主线调度 / 状态存档 / story bible) — a meta-skill that adds no new craft knowledge but routes a screenplay or stage-play project through stages (premise → structure → character → scenes → draft → revision → submission) and a TV / streaming series project (电视剧 / 剧集 / pilot / 一季) through a separate series stage table (engine → character network & season arc → documents/bible → pilot structure → break story & outline → draft → submission), names which sw-* skill to invoke at each stage, defines each stage's deliverable and advisory exit check, and keeps all project state in a story-bible.md file so work can resume across sessions. Use when starting a new script project, resuming one ("continue my screenplay", "where were we"), when the user asks "what should I do next" on a script, when converting a vague idea into a full development pipeline, or when the other sw-* skills are firing individually and the overall process needs sequencing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Land the winning experiment from an evo run as a clean, mergeable change -- open a PR when the repo has a remote, otherwise merge into the working branch. Distills the best-scoring experiment down to the minimal diff that reproduces its behaviour, shaped for the qualities a maintainer merges on (scope discipline, test integrity, style adherence), then attaches an advisory mergeability report. Use when the user invokes /evo:ship, asks to land/merge/ship the best result, or wants to turn a finished optimization into a pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting, updating, or reviewing an S2-XXX security bulletin on the Struts cwiki, when preparing bulletin text ahead of a CVE request, when filling a CVE record in the ASF CVE tool (cveprocess.apache.org / Vulnogram), when deciding when to publish, when publishing a bulletin and announcing it to the ASF lists, when wrapping up after the advisory mails, or when deciding how much detail about a fixed vulnerability is safe to publish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent disclosures, CVE and advisory records, and the attack-and-defense lineage that a SIGSAC program committee expects to see credited.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage third-party libraries, runtimes, and SaaS dependencies. Use this skill when setting an update cadence, responding to security advisories, dealing with deprecated dependencies, evaluating new dependencies, auditing what's installed, or unblocking a dependency upgrade. Triggers on dependency, package update, security patch, lockfile, deprecated, breaking change, supply chain, dependency audit, npm audit, dependabot, renovate. Also triggers when a build breaks after an update or when an advisory is published for a used package.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate test coverage with a ratchet — a committed baseline that coverage may never drop below and only ever rises. Ships a coverage-gate script (xccov-based) plus an advisory CRAP report (complexity × uncovered). Use when agent-written code needs a deterministic "tests were actually written" check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EXPERIMENTAL — mutation testing with muter to measure whether tests actually assert anything: mutants that survive reveal assertion-free coverage. Advisory report only, never a merge gate. Use on engine/logic targets when coverage numbers look good but bugs still slip through.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One lifecycle poll over everything vuln-scanner produces - PR and advisory status, PVR triage transitions, and pending-disclosure aging, with a stars-secured impact headline and one action queue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply an advisory scope in this session. Use for read-only or directory-scoped work; no enforcement hook is installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply an advisory edit scope in this session. Use for read-only or directory-scoped work; no enforcement hook is installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews lyrics and prose for AI-written patterns (abstract noun stacking, over-explained metaphors, cliche escalation, missing idiosyncrasy, prose AI tells). Advisory Warning/Info severity — flags issues, does not block or rewrite. Use when reviewing lyrics for authenticity or before generation to catch AI-sounding language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn one confirmed security finding into a disclosure-ready GitHub advisory with root cause, proof of concept, impact, and source evidence. Use for reporting an established vulnerability, not discovering or validating one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。