「alternatives」の検索結果

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting. Use whenever a user wants to compare groups, test a hypothesis, analyze experimental or survey data, check statistical assumptions, compute required sample sizes, or write up results - even if they never name a specific test. Covers t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, correlation, regression, non-parametric and Bayesian methods. For low-level model APIs, see the statsmodels and pymc skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a GitHub issue or PR for demonstrated need, supported alternatives, correctness, and maintainer action. Desk review only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang library and framework selection — vetted production-ready options by category (web, database, testing, logging, messaging), new and experimental stdlib packages, standard-library-first tradeoffs, and maturity signals (maintenance, license, importer counts). Apply when the user asks for library suggestions, wants to compare alternatives, needs to choose a library for a specific task, or when a new dependency is being added to the project. Not for a specific library's API once chosen (→ See that library's dedicated skill, e.g. `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-lo`), nor for go.mod mechanics, upgrades, or vulnerability audits (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go (Golang) naming conventions — covers packages, constructors, structs, interfaces, constants, enums, errors, booleans, receivers, getters/setters, functional options, acronyms, test functions, and subtest names. Use this skill when writing new Go code, reviewing or refactoring, choosing between naming alternatives (New vs NewTypeName, isConnected vs connected, ErrNotFound vs NotFoundError, StatusReady vs StatusUnknown at iota 0), debating Go package names (utils/helpers anti-patterns), or asking about Go naming best practices. Also trigger when the user mentions MixedCaps vs snake_case, ALL_CAPS constants, Get-prefix on getters, or error string casing. Do NOT use for general Go implementation questions that don't involve naming decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intelligently deploys Azure OpenAI models to optimal regions by analyzing capacity across all available regions. Automatically checks current region first and shows alternatives if needed. USE FOR: quick deployment, optimal region, best region, automatic region selection, fast setup, multi-region capacity check, high availability deployment, deploy to best location. DO NOT USE FOR: custom SKU selection (use customize), specific version selection (use customize), custom capacity configuration (use customize), PTU deployments (use customize).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React useEffect best practices from official docs. Use when writing/reviewing useEffect, useState for derived values, data fetching, or state synchronization. Teaches when NOT to use Effect and better alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Excalidraw canvas toolkit for creating, editing, and refining diagrams on a live canvas. Use when an agent needs to (1) draw or lay out diagrams, (2) iteratively refine them by describing the scene and screenshotting its own work, (3) export/import .excalidraw files or PNG/SVG images, (4) save/restore canvas snapshots, (5) convert Mermaid to Excalidraw, or (6) perform element-level CRUD, alignment, distribution, grouping, duplication, and locking. Primary interface is the bundled CLI (npx -y mcp-excalidraw-server <command>) which auto-starts the canvas server; MCP tools and a REST API are equivalent alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curated bank of interview problems organized by company, pattern, and difficulty. Provides problem recommendations, coverage tracking, weak area identification, and premium problem alternatives for FAANG interview preparation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-first development methodology that investigates existing solutions, brainstorms alternatives, and evaluates trade-offs before any implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intelligently deploys Azure OpenAI models to optimal regions by analyzing capacity across all available regions. Automatically checks current region first and shows alternatives if needed. USE FOR: quick deployment, optimal region, best region, automatic region selection, fast setup, multi-region capacity check, high availability deployment, deploy to best location. DO NOT USE FOR: custom SKU selection (use customize), specific version selection (use customize), custom capacity configuration (use customize), PTU deployments (use customize).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-only RPI playbook that gathers task evidence, writes dated research artifacts under .copilot-tracking/research/ or a caller's trusted evidence root, and hands off planning-ready findings. Use when the user needs evidence, alternatives, or task framing first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a change small and in the existing idiom - size the plan and weigh smaller alternatives before writing it, reuse the mechanism that already owns the behavior instead of adding a parallel one, and simplify the diff before handoff. Use when planning any change beyond a few lines, before readying a PR, or when reviewing agent-written code for bloat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates several distinct, clickable HTML interaction prototypes for one product surface into a Design Board and collects selection/remix feedback before implementation. Use for multiple UI versions, interaction alternatives, progressive-disclosure options, or when styling is fine but hierarchy/workflow/interaction feels off. Not for static visual-style calibration (use design-style-picker) or a settled CSS tweak.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a framing document from conversation transcripts. Use when the user has transcripts (VTT, call notes, etc.) and wants to produce a frame that captures the problem worth solving and why it was chosen over alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users define the strategic context for their product by identifying the right competitive alternatives, unique value drivers, and target segments to win a market category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word: sdd (full package), sources (MRD → BRD → URD) for market research, customer discovery, and business or user requirements, iso (BRS → StRS → SyRS → SRS) for ISO 29148 and regulated work, research for a technical investigation — never market research — that the research instrument closes either by scope coverage (a research document) or by a recommendation (an rnd). Explicit form: plan research <topic>. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we're regulated — start the ISO requirements cascade', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y' — a new investigation, not a finished report already in hand. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building the robustness section for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — replacing accounting measures with alternatives, adding governance / institutional controls, placebo tests, and endogeneity follow-ups — so the main result survives an accounting referee's scrutiny. Use after mechanism is settled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two or more companies, products, or platforms across pricing, features, positioning, and docs. Use this skill whenever the user says "compare X vs Y", "how does X stack up against Y", "alternatives to X", "competitive landscape of …", "X vs Y vs Z", or asks for a competitor matrix. Uses search to discover competitors when the user only names a category, then scrape for each competitor's homepage, pricing page, and features/docs. Returns a normalized comparison matrix as JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify programmatic SEO page patterns worth building for your product — vs/ pages, integrations/, for-{industry}/, alternatives-to/, use-cases/ — and design the template structure, data model, and priority order. Outputs a complete pSEO blueprint with URL patterns, title templates, content frameworks, and data sources per variable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a short-form video ad from an evidence-backed angle and the selected template's actual recipe. Reuses or fetches ad-angle-miner, preserves the chosen angle, plans words and visuals together, checks product claims and production fit, and delivers the strongest script with useful alternatives. Use before video production and for script rewrites. Customer language is one input alongside audience, promise, product proof, offer and format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。