「ambiguity」の検索結果

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and validate BE spec files, update indexes/tracker, run deepening and ambiguity gates, and enforce allowed next-step transitions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author FE spec files, update indexes/tracker, run deepening and ambiguity gates, and enforce navigation completeness before plan-phase handoff

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate backend spec production from completed IA shards through classify and write passes with mandatory ambiguity gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate IA shard authoring via design and deepen passes, with pipeline-state-driven shard selection and ambiguity gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methodology for writing complete, unambiguous IA, BE, and FE specification documents in the CFSA pipeline. Covers completeness testing, progressive section writing, cross-reference checking, and ambiguity gate application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run iterative IA deepening, finalize shard, update indexes/tracker, and enforce ambiguity gates before handoff

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scoring rubrics for all 5 pipeline layers (Vision, Architecture, IA, BE, FE). Use when auditing specs, running self-checks, or remediating ambiguity gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict peptide-MHC class II (HLA-DR/DQ/DP) binding and presentation for CD4 T-cell epitopes with NetMHCIIpan-4.3 and MixMHC2pred-2.0. Covers why class II is far less reliable than class I (open binding groove, 9-mer register ambiguity, sparse noisy training data, DR>DP>DQ accuracy asymmetry), the DQ/DP heterodimer alpha/beta pairing trap, and the looser 1%/5% %Rank thresholds. Use when predicting CD4 epitopes for vaccine help, mapping class II neoantigens, or scoring long peptides against DR/DQ/DP. For CD8/class I see mhc-binding-prediction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM; Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows; Cui 2016 *Bioinformatics* 32:i378), MACS3 / MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment confirmation via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output formats, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union; cross-caller IDR-equivalent), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody-based methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal-validation routes (miCLIP / GLORI / m6A-SAC-seq / m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set as a whole, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against orthogonal single-base methods, interpreting peaks at the 5' end where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a multi-tool consensus strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotates ChIP-seq peaks to genomic features, nearest genes, ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs), and regulatory domains. Uses ChIPseeker (R), HOMER annotatePeaks.pl (CLI), pyranges (Python), GREAT/rGREAT (regulatory domain gene-set enrichment), ChIP-Enrich (locus-length-adjusted), ENCODE SCREEN cCRE classification (PLS/pELS/dELS/CTCF-only/DNase-H3K4me3), and ENCODE-rE2G for cell-type-specific enhancer-gene linking. Handles nearest-TSS vs host-gene ambiguity, promoter window definition, and feature priority. Use when assigning genomic context to peaks, linking enhancer peaks to target genes, classifying peaks against ENCODE cCRE registry, or running gene-set enrichment on peak-associated genes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes alternative splicing from PacBio Iso-Seq (HiFi, Kinnex/MAS-Iso-seq) and Oxford Nanopore (direct cDNA, direct RNA, R10.4.1+) long-read RNA-seq with full-isoform resolution. Tools include FLAIR (correct/collapse/quantify/diffSplice for PacBio + ONT), IsoQuant (de-novo or annotation-guided isoform discovery 2024 SOTA), Bambu (annotation-aware Bayesian discovery + quantification with Novel Discovery Rate), SQANTI3/SQANTI-LR (isoform classification: FSM/ISM/NIC/NNC + artifact flags), rMATS-long (event calling on long-read isoforms), and minimap2 (-ax splice:hq for HiFi; -ax splice -k14 for ONT cDNA; add -uf only for direct RNA or stranded cDNA preps). Solves microexon detection, recursive splicing, complex multi-exon isoforms, and DTU without transcript-quantification uncertainty. Use when short-read AS limitations (anchor length, complex isoforms, microexons, recursive splicing, transcript ambiguity) demand full-isoform resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fighter-jet / helicopter head-up display: phosphor green on near-black, all-caps data overlays, angular geometry. Zero ambiguity at speed and altitude. For flight-sim UIs, telemetry, and command-and-control displays.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an existing skill must be refactored to cut context and ambiguity without losing behavior, safety or fallbacks — 'refatorar a skill', 'reduzir esta SKILL.md', 'revisar skill com métricas' — with before/after metrics, preserved invariants and three review rounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Match a user request to the right skill using trigger matching, project context, and conversation history. Score ambiguity 1–10 and resolve it using context signals or a single clarifying question. Load when project-orchestrator needs to route a request, or when multiple skills could match and the right one is unclear. Also triggers on "which skill should handle this", "route this request", "I'm not sure which skill to use", "disambiguate this", "skill routing". Called by project-orchestrator for request routing. For finding whether a skill exists for a capability, use skill-finder instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict peptide-MHC class II (HLA-DR/DQ/DP) binding and presentation for CD4 T-cell epitopes with NetMHCIIpan-4.3 and MixMHC2pred-2.0. Covers why class II is far less reliable than class I (open binding groove, 9-mer register ambiguity, sparse noisy training data, DR>DP>DQ accuracy asymmetry), the DQ/DP heterodimer alpha/beta pairing trap, and the looser 1%/5% %Rank thresholds. Use when predicting CD4 epitopes for vaccine help, mapping class II neoantigens, or scoring long peptides against DR/DQ/DP. For CD8/class I see mhc-binding-prediction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM; Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows; Cui 2016 *Bioinformatics* 32:i378), MACS3 / MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment confirmation via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output formats, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union; cross-caller IDR-equivalent), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody-based methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal-validation routes (miCLIP / GLORI / m6A-SAC-seq / m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set as a whole, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against orthogonal single-base methods, interpreting peaks at the 5' end where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a multi-tool consensus strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotates ChIP-seq peaks to genomic features, nearest genes, ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs), and regulatory domains. Uses ChIPseeker (R), HOMER annotatePeaks.pl (CLI), pyranges (Python), GREAT/rGREAT (regulatory domain gene-set enrichment), ChIP-Enrich (locus-length-adjusted), ENCODE SCREEN cCRE classification (PLS/pELS/dELS/CTCF-only/DNase-H3K4me3), and ENCODE-rE2G for cell-type-specific enhancer-gene linking. Handles nearest-TSS vs host-gene ambiguity, promoter window definition, and feature priority. Use when assigning genomic context to peaks, linking enhancer peaks to target genes, classifying peaks against ENCODE cCRE registry, or running gene-set enrichment on peak-associated genes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes alternative splicing from PacBio Iso-Seq (HiFi, Kinnex/MAS-Iso-seq) and Oxford Nanopore (direct cDNA, direct RNA, R10.4.1+) long-read RNA-seq with full-isoform resolution. Tools include FLAIR (correct/collapse/quantify/diffSplice for PacBio + ONT), IsoQuant (de-novo or annotation-guided isoform discovery 2024 SOTA), Bambu (annotation-aware Bayesian discovery + quantification with Novel Discovery Rate), SQANTI3/SQANTI-LR (isoform classification: FSM/ISM/NIC/NNC + artifact flags), rMATS-long (event calling on long-read isoforms), and minimap2 (-ax splice:hq for HiFi; -ax splice -k14 for ONT cDNA; add -uf only for direct RNA or stranded cDNA preps). Solves microexon detection, recursive splicing, complex multi-exon isoforms, and DTU without transcript-quantification uncertainty. Use when short-read AS limitations (anchor length, complex isoforms, microexons, recursive splicing, transcript ambiguity) demand full-isoform resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract a DDD-style domain glossary from conversation context, choosing canonical terms and flagging ambiguity. Use when the user asks to define domain terms, build a glossary, clarify terminology, create a ubiquitous language, or mentions domain modeling or DDD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。